Wednesday, 25 October 2023

Rebuttal to Samuel Green's Article "MUHAMMAD'S PERFECT MEMORY?"

 Rebuttal to Samuel Green's Article "MUHAMMAD'S PERFECT MEMORY?"

by 

Bassam Zawadi 

This article is in response to http://www.answeringislam.org/Green/forgot.htm 

 

Samuel Green said:

One of the reasons that Muslims give for the perfection of the Qur'an is that Muhammad had a perfect memory. It is said that God gave Muhammed not just the words to speak but also the ability to remember these words perfectly. This claim is seen in the following Islamic scholar:

Still further, and perhaps most significantly, so long as the Prophet lived, the Community had in him an infallible guide as to the correct recitation of the Koran. The Prophet was granted special protection against forgetfulness, as the Koran itself indicates: By degrees shall we teach thee to declare (the message), so thou shalt not forget, except as God wills (Sura 87:6-7). (Labib as-Said, The Recited Koran - A History of the First Recorded Version. Princeton, New Jersey: The Darwin Press, 1975. p. 20. Bold added)

Is this claim true or is it an exaggeration? In this article we will consider what the Qur'an and Hadith say about Muhammad's memory and that of his Companions.

WHAT DOES THE QUR'AN SAY ABOUT MUHAMMAD'S MEMORY?

The verse referred to by Labib as-Said is an interesting verse because it actually says the exact opposite of what Labib as-Said is claiming. Labib as-Said says that the verse shows that Muhammad, "was granted special protection against forgetfulness". However he has missed one very important word in this verse, the word "except". Let us have another look at this verse:

By degrees shall we teach thee (Muhammad) to declare (the message), so thou shalt not forget, except as God wills (Sura 87:6-7).

This verse is not saying that Muhammad will never forget any of the Qur'an. It is saying that he will only forget what God wills. So the verse is actually saying that Muhammad did forget some of the Qur'an. This interpretation is also the interpretation found in the Hadith. Consider the following.

WHAT DOES THE HADITH SAY ABOUT MUHAMMAD'S MEMORY?

Sahih al-Bukhari: book 61, volume 6

556. Narrated Aisha: The Prophet heard a man reciting the Qur'an in the mosque and said, "May Allah bestow His Mercy on him, as he has reminded me of such-and-such Verses of such a Surah."

557. Narrated Hisham: (The same Hadith, adding): which I missed (modifying the Verses).

558. Narrated Aisha: Allah's Apostle heard a man reciting the Qur'an at night, and said, "May Allah bestow His Mercy on him, as he has reminded me of such-and-such Verses of such-and-such Suras, which I was caused to forget."

559. Narrated Abdullah: The Prophet said, "Why does anyone of the people say, 'I have forgotten such-and-such Verses (of the Qur'an)?' He, in fact, is caused (by Allah) to forget."

562. Narrated 'Aisha: The Prophet heard a reciter reciting, the Qur'an in the mosque at night. The Prophet said, "May Allah bestow His Mercy on him, as he has reminded me of such-and-such Verses of such and-such Suras, which I missed!"

Sahih Muslim: book 4, volume 1

(1720) 'Aisha reported that the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) heard a person reciting the Qur'an at night. Upon this he said, "May Allah show mercy to him; he has reminded me of such and such a verse which I had missed in such and such a surah.

(1721) 'Aisha reported that the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) listened to the recitation of the Qur'an by a man in the mosque. Thereupon he said: May Allah have mercy upon him; he reminded me of the verse which I had been made to forget.

(1724)'Abdullah reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: What a wretched person is he amongst them who says: I have forgotten such and such a verse. (He should instead of using this expression say): I have been made to forget it. Try to remember the Qur'an for it is more apt to escape from men's minds than a hobbled camel.

(1726) Ibn Mas'ud reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: Wretched is the man who says: I forgot such and such a sura, or I forget such and such a verse, but he has been made to forget.

Sunan Abu Dawud: book 3, number 1015; volume I (Also Sahih al-Bukhari, vol.1, hadith 394)

Narrated Abdullah ibn Mas'ud: The Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) offered prayer. The version of the narrator Ibrahim goes: I do not know whether he increased or decreased (the rak'ahs of prayer).

When he gave the salutation, he was asked: Has something new happened in the prayer, Apostle of Allah? He said: What is it? They said: You prayed so many and so many (rak'ahs). He then relented his foot and faced the Qiblah and made two prostrations. He then gave the salutation. When he turned away (finished the prayer), he turned his face to us and said: Had anything new happened in prayer, I would have informed you. I am only a human being and I forget just as you do; so when I forget, remind me, and when any of you is in doubt about his prayer he should aim at what is correct, and complete his prayer in that respect, then give the salutation and afterwards made two prostrations.

Thus from the above hadiths that there were occasions when Muhammad forgot parts of the Qur'an.

My Response:

Al-Tabari says in his commentary...  

وَمَعْنَى الْكَلَام : فَلَا تَنْسَى , إِلَّا مَا شَاءَ اللَّه أَنْ تَنْسَاهُ , وَلَا تَذْكُرهُ , قَالُوا : ذَلِكَ هُوَ مَا نَسَخَهُ اللَّه مِنْ الْقُرْآن , فَرَفَعَ حُكْمه وَتِلَاوَته . ذِكْر مَنْ قَالَ ذَلِكَ : 28645 - حَدَّثَنَا بِشْر , قَالَ : ثَنَا يَزِيد , قَالَ : ثَنَا سَعِيد , عَنْ قَتَادَة { سَنُقْرِئُك فَلَا تَنْسَى } كَانَ صَلَّى اللَّه عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ لَا يَنْسَى شَيْئًا { إِلَّا مَا شَاءَ اللَّه } . وَقَالَ آخَرُونَ : مَعْنَى النِّسْيَان فِي هَذَا الْمَوْضِع : التَّرْك ; وَقَالُوا : مَعْنَى الْكَلَام : سَنُقْرِئُك يَا مُحَمَّد فَلَا تَتْرُك الْعَمَل بِشَيْءٍ مِنْهُ , إِلَّا مَا شَاءَ اللَّه أَنْ تَتْرُك الْعَمَل بِهِ , مِمَّا نَنْسَخهُ .   وَكَانَ بَعْض أَهْل الْعَرَبِيَّة يَقُول فِي ذَلِكَ : لَمْ يَشَأْ اللَّه أَنْ تَنْسَى شَيْئًا , وَهُوَ كَقَوْلِهِ : { خَالِدِينَ فِيهَا مَا دَامَتْ السَّمَاوَات    وَالْأَرْض إِلَّا مَا شَاءَ رَبّك } 11 107 وَلَا يَشَاء

And the meaning of this statement: 'Thou shalt not forget', except as God wills what you should forget and don't remember it, They said: That is what Allah has abrogated from the Quran, so he lifted its wisdom and recitation. It is reported by Bashar on the authority of Yazid on the authority of Sa'eed, that Qutada said that Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) never forgot anything (except as God willed). And others reported: The meaning of forgetfulness in this context means 'abandonment' and they said: The meaning of the statement 'We shall make thee read', oh Muhammad so don't stop practicing any part of it except that which Allah commands you to stop practicing because it got abrogated. And those of the Arabic speaking language said regarding this: God did not will that the Prophet forget anything. And it is like Allah's similar statement 'Abiding therein, so long as the heavens and the earth endure, except as thy Lord may will. Surely, thy Lord does what HE pleases.' Surah 11: 107 and He does not will it. (Ibn Jarir al-Tabari, Jami' al-bayan fi ta'wil al-Qur'an, Commentary on Surah 87:7, Source) 

Ibn Kathir states in his commentary...

Qatadah said, "The Prophet did not forget anything except what Allah willed.'' It has been said that the meaning of Allah's statement, (so you shall not forget,) is, "do not forget'' and that which would be abrogated, is merely an exception to this. (Tafsir Ibn Kathir, Source)

So we clearly see that the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) did not forget any portions of the Quran that he was never meant to forget. As we see, one explanation for this verse is that God intended for the Prophet to forget the abrogated verses of the Qur'an. To understand more about abrogation, visit my section http://www.call-to-monotheism.com/qur_anic_variants and especially read this article http://www.call-to-monotheism.com/introduction_to_quranic_variants

Another possible explanation is that God just simply never willed the Prophet to ever forget any verse from the Quran. When God says that something happens if He wills it, it is intended to show His power and majesty because He has control over all things.

Another possible interpretation is that when God said, "thou shalt not forget" it means that you should not abandon. For in the Arabic language, the word "tunsa" could mean to forget or abandon (refer to the well known Arabic dictionary Lisaanul Arab of Ibn Manzoor). For example...

Surah 7:51

Who took their religion for a sport and pastime, and whom the life of the world beguiled. So this day We have forgotten (nansaahum) them even as they forgot the meeting of this their Day and as they used to deny Our tokens.

Ibn Kathir has it in his commentary...

Ali bin Abi Talhah reported that Ibn `Abbas said, "We shall forsake them as they have forsaken the meeting of this Day of theirs.'' (Tafsir ibn Kathir, Source)

Imam Tabari has it in his commentary...

 نَتْرُكهُمْ فِي الْعَذَاب الْمُبِين جِيَاعًا عِطَاشًا بِغَيْرِ طَعَام وَلَا شَرَاب , كَمَا تَرَكُوا الْعَمَل لِلِقَاءِ يَوْمهمْ هَذَا وَرَفَضُوا الِاسْتِعْدَاد لَهُ بِإِتْعَابِ أَبْدَانهمْ فِي طَاعَة اللَّه. وَقَدْ بَيَّنَّا مَعْنَى قَوْله نَنْسَاهُمْ بِشَوَاهِدِهِ فِيمَا مَضَى بِمَا أَغْنَى عَنْ إِعَادَته

We will abandon them in the punishment which cuts them off, leaving them hungry and thirsty without any food or drink, just as they abandoned action for hte meeting on this Day, and they rejected preparation for it by wearying their bodies in obedience to Allah, and we have explained clearly the meaning of His saing "nansaahum" previously along with its witnesses, so there is no need to repeat it. (Ibn Jarir al-Tabari, Jami' al-bayan fi ta'wil al-Qur'an, Commentary on Surah 7:54, Source)

Even according to the hadith posted by Samuel Green (Sunan Abu Dawud: book 3, number 1015; volume I) goes to show that the Prophet (peace be upon him) was just a normal human being just like us and helps the Muslims not make the same mistake as the Christians did with Jesus Christ... 

Saheeh Bukhari

Volume 004, Book 055, Hadith Number 654.
-----------------------------------------
Narated By 'Umar : I heard the Prophet saying, "Do not exaggerate in praising me as the Christians praised the son of Mary, for I am only a Slave. So, call me the Slave of Allah and His Apostle."

Even if Islamic critics want to be stubborn and persist that the Prophet (peace be upon him) forgot needed verses from the Quran, this could be refuted by the fact that the Prophet (peace be upon him) always used to rehearse the Quran to angel Gabriel and angel Gabriel would have corrected the Prophet (peace be upon him) where he went wrong. Furthermore, angel Gabriel recited the Quran TWICE to the Prophet in the year he died...

Saheeh Bukhari

Volume 006, Book 061, Hadith Number 519.

Narated By Ibn 'Abbas : The Prophet was the most generous person, and he used to become more so (generous) particularly in the month of Ramadan because Gabriel used to meet him every night of the month of Ramadan till it elapsed. Allah's Apostle used to recite the Qur'an for him. When Gabriel met him, he used to become more generous than the fast wind in doing good.

Volume 6, Book 61, Number 520:

Narrated Abu-Huraira: Gabriel used to repeat the recitation of the Qur'an with the Prophet once a year, but he repeated it twice with him in the year he died. The Prophet used to stay in I'tikaf for ten days every year (in the month of Ramadan), but in the year of his death, he stayed in I'tikaf for twenty days. 

Furthermore, the Prophet (peace be upon him) would order his scribes to write down the Quran as soon as the revelations came to him... 

Taken from http://www.answering-christianity.com/quran/quran_textual-reply.html#1...

The Written Qur'an in the Times of The Prophet Muhammad (pbuh)

A large number of missionaries and the self-styled "critics" have been quoting Islamic traditions, or reports (Hadith), which support their claim, that the Qur'an was not written at the time of its Revelation. Are all these claims true? They are not, if we re-examine them.

Back to Top.

Evidence from the Qur'an

The Qur'an itself contains many passages which refer to its written form. There appear to be four chapters (Sura's) of the Qur'an which refer to the Qur'an's written form explicitly. I'll quote them:

"By no means! Indeed it is a message of Instruction
Therefore, whoever wills, should remember
On leaves held in honour
Exalted, purified
In the hands of scribes
Noble and pious"

Sura' 80: 11-16

Here we have a reference to those scribes who wrote the Qur'an, on leaves. Minister Abdullah Yusuf Ali, in his commentary  wrote that at the time of the Revelation of this Surah, forty-two or forty-five others (Surahs) had been written and were kept by Muslims in Makkah (out of the total 114 Surahs).

"Nay, this is the glorious Qur'an, on a Tablet preserved"
Sura' 85: 21-22

The above verse is the ultimate proof on the written preservation of the Qur'an even before the migration of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh).

"This is a glorious Reading, In a book well-kept,
Which none but the purified teach
This is a Revelation from the Lord of the Worlds"

Sura' 56: 77-80

The above verse refers to a "book well-kept," which can be no other than the Qur'an.

"They said: Tales of the ancients which he had caused to be written and they are dictated to him morning and evening"
25: 5

A reference to the enemies of the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) when they accused him of plagiarising and retelling stories from the past. Still, we see words referring to the Qur'an in its written form.

Back to Top.

Evidence from Hadith

Besides the above verses which refer to the Qur'an's written form, there are also a number of Hadith which agree with the above verses:

Zayd(ra) is reported to have said: 

We used to compile the Qur'an from small scraps in the presence of the Messenger. (Hakim, Mustadrak)

The above Hadith also tells us that the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was not unaware of the condition of the Qur'an with his companions and that he used to guide them while compiling it. Also, it tells us that the Qur'an also used to be compiled for Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), meaning that he had a personal copy.

Malik said that no one should carry the Mushaf by its strap, nor on a pillow, unless he is clean. (Mu'atta, Kitab Al-Nida' Li'l-Salah)

It is clear that the Qur'an was available in a book form at the time of the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh).

Narrated Qatadah: I asked Anas Ibn Malik: 'Who collected the Qur'an at the time of Prophet?' He replied: 'Four, all of whom were from the Ansar: Ubay Ibn Ka'ab, Mu'adh Ibn Jabal, Zayd Ibn Thabit and Abu Zayd.' (Bukhari, Kitab Fada'ilu'l-Qur'an)

It is very clear that the complete Qur'an was available in the form of a book even at the time of the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). This proof is inescapable, and any Hadith which contradicts the facts presented here is a fabrication.

Back to Top.

The Oral Transmission of the Qur'an

Even until today, manypeople have completely memorized the Qur'an. These people are known as Hafizun, which means that they are the protectors of the Qur'an. The real protector is Allah, the Lord of all Being, but Hafizun are called protectors because if the Qur'an was ever lost, the Hafizun can easily restore it. People have not started becoming Hafizun recently, but many of them were also present at the time of the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). The Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) himself was a person who had memorized the whole Qur'an, word by word.

Back to Top.

The First Hafiz

The first one to memorize the complete Qur'an, was, the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) himself. After a Revelation came to the Prophet (pbuh), he memorized it:

'Move not thy tongue concerning the (Qur'an) to make
haste therewith. It is for Us to collect it and promulgate
it; but when We have promulgated it, follow thou its
recital' 
(75: 16-19)

Instead of the above verse, they are so many Hadith which say that the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) had memorized the Qur'an, they quoting them is not needed. Any one with even the knowledge of an atom concerning Islam may be knowing this.

Back to Top.

Hafizun Among the Companions

The Prophet (pbuh) had thousands of companions, and it is for sure that hundreds of them too had memorized the whole Qur'an, word by word, just as the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) himself did.

"... the first man to speak the Qur'an loudly in Makka after the apostle was 'Abdullah bin Mas'ud. The Prophet's Companions came together and mentioned that the Quraish had never heard the Qur'an distinctly read to them ... When (Ibn Mas'ud) arrived at the maqAm, he read "In the name of God the Compassionate the Merciful", raising his voice as he did so. "The Compassionate who taught the Qur'an ..." (55:1) ... They got up and began to hit him in the face; but he continued to read so far as God willed that he should read ..." Guillaume, E.:  The Life of Muhammad (abbr. as Ibn Hisham), London, 55, pp. 141-2; Ibn Hisham: Sira al-nabi, Cairo, n.d., 1, p.206.

The above report clearly shows that even in the earlier days of Islam, people memorized the Qur'an. It is also reported that Abu Bakr (ra) recited the Qur'an publicly in front of his house (Sira Ibn Hisham).

In addition to this, it is compulsory to recite the Qur'an in prayers. So the companions, at least, had memorized some of the Qur'an if not the whole as others did.

Back to Top.

Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) Encouraged Memorization

The best thing we could do here was to quote a passage from the second chapter of Ahmad von Denffer's book, Ulum al Qur'an:

There are numerous ahadith, giving account of various efforts made and measures taken by the Prophet to ensure that the revelation was preserved in the memory of his Companions. The following is perhaps the most clear:
'Narrated 'Uthman bin 'Affan: The Prophet said: "The most superior among you (Muslims) are those who learn the Qur'an and teach it".' 
Bukhari, VI, No. 546.

Back to Top.

Listening to Others by the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh)

The Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), also listened to the recital of others. Here is a Hadith showing this:

"Narrated 'Abdullah (Ibn Mas'ud): 'Allah's Apostle said to me: "Recite (of the Qur'an) for me". I said: "Shall I recite it to you although it had been revealed to you?!" He said: "I like to hear (the Qur'an) from others". So I recited Surat-an-Nisa' till I reached: "How (will it be) then when We bring from each nation a witness and We bring you (O Muhammad) as a witness against these people?" ' (4: 41).  'Then he said: "Stop!" Behold, his eyes were shedding tears then." Bukhari, VI, No. 106.

Back to Top.

Conclusion

In addition to writing, the whole Qur'an was also memorized by hundreds of Muslims and even those who had met the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) himself. Just as the whole Qur'an was preserved by writing, the whole Qur'an was also preserved by memorization too.

Back to Top.

As a matter of fact, all this is actually is supportive evidence that the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) did not author the Qur'an. If he was the author of this book and the source of its information then why would he ever worry about forgetting it?

Samuel Green said:

HAT DOES THE HADITH SAY ABOUT THE MEMORY OF THE COMPANIONS?

Sahih Muslim: book 5, volume 2

(2286) Abu Harb b. Abu al-Aswad reported on the authority of his father that Abu Musa al-Ash'ari sent for the reciters of Basra. They came to him and they were three hundred in number. They recited the Qur'an and he said: You are the best among the inhabitants of Basra, for you are the reciters among them. So continue to recite it. (But bear in mind) that your reciting for a long time may not harden your hearts as were hardened the hearts of those before you. We used to recite a surah which resembled in length and severity to (Surah) Bar'at. I have forgotten it with the exception of this which I remember out of it: "If there were two valleys full of riches, for the son of Adam, he would long for a third valley, and nothing would fill the stomach of the son of Adam but dust." And we used so recite a surah which resembled one of the surahs of Musabbihat, and I have forgetten it, but remember (this much) out of it: "O people who believe, why do you say that which you do not practise: (lxi 2.) and "that is recorded in your necks as a witness (against you) and you would be asked about it on the Day of Resurrection" (xvii. 13)

Here we see one of the Companions testifying the existence of part of a surah that is no longer in the Qur'an because it had been forgotten by them.

CONCLUSION

The evidence from the Qur'an and Hadith clearly teaches that Muhammad and his Companions had normal memories and did forget parts of the Qur'an. Rather than make exaggerated claims about Muhammad's memory Muslims should listen to what Muhammad said about himself: I am only a human being and I forget just as you do. (Sahih al-Bukhari, Sunan Abu Dawud)

My Response:

Some of the companions of the Prophet (peace be upon him) initially believed that the statement "If there were two valleys full of riches, for the son of Adam, he would long for a third valley, and nothing would fill the stomach of the son of Adam but dust." was part of the Qur'an. 

However, it is turns out that the statement was nothing more than a hadith. Here are some hadith to show this... 

Saheeh Bukhari

Volume 8, Book 76, Number 444:

Narrated Ibn 'Abbas:

I heard the Prophet saying, "If the son of Adam (the human being) had two valley of money, he would wish for a third, for nothing can fill the belly of Adam's son except dust, and Allah forgives him who repents to Him."

Volume 8, Book 76, Number 445:

Narrated Ibn 'Abbas:

I heard Allah's Apostle saying, "If the son of Adam had money equal to a valley, then he will wish for another similar to it, for nothing can satisfy the eye of Adam's son except dust. And Allah forgives him who repents to Him." Ibn 'Abbas said: I do not know whether this saying was quoted from the Qur'an or not. 'Ata' said, "I heard Ibn AzZubair saying this narration while he was on the pulpit."

Volume 8, Book 76, Number 446:

Narrated Sahl bin Sa'd:

I heard Ibn Az-Zubair who was on the pulpit at Mecca, delivering a sermon, saying, "O men! The Prophet used to say, "If the son of Adam were given a valley full of gold, he would love to have a second one; and if he were given the second one, he would love to have a third, for nothing fills the belly of Adam's son except dust. And Allah forgives he who repents to Him." Ubai said, "We considered this as a saying from the Qur'an till the Sura (beginning with) 'The mutual rivalry for piling up of worldly things diverts you..' (102.1) was revealed."

Volume 8, Book 76, Number 447:

Narrated Anas bin Malik:

Allah's Apostle said, "If Adam's son had a valley full of gold, he would like to have two valleys, for nothing fills his mouth except dust. And Allah forgives him who repents to Him."

Imam Ibn Hajar Al Asqalani says in Fathul Bari...

ومنه ما وقع عند أحمد وأبي عبيد في " فضائل القرآن " من حديث أبي واقد الليثي قال " كنا نأتي النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم إذا نزل عليه فيحدثنا , فقال لنا ذات يوم : إن الله قال إنما أنزلنا المال لإقام الصلاة وإيتاء الزكاة , ولو كان لابن آدم واد لأحب أن يكون له ثان " الحديث بتمامه , وهذا يحتمل أن يكون النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم أخبر به عن الله  تعالى على أنه من القرآن , ويحتمل أن يكون من الأحاديث القدسية , والله أعلم وعلى الأول فهو مما نسخت تلاوته  جزما وإن كان حكمه مستمرا                                                                                     

When this Surah was revealed and expressed the same meaning as it (the Adam statement) they knew that the first statement (the Adam statement) was from the statements of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). Some of them explained it to be part of the Quran and then its recitation was abrogated when 'The mutual rivalry for piling up of worldly things diverts you..' (102.1) was revealed." so its recitation persisted so it abrogated the recitation of that (the Adam statement). But it's wisdom and ruling was not abrogated if its recitation was abrogated. 

ومنه ما وقع عند أحمد وأبي عبيد في " فضائل القرآن " من حديث أبي واقد الليثي قال " كنا نأتي النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم إذا نزل عليه فيحدثنا, فقال لنا ذات يوم : إن الله قال إنما أنزلنا المال لإقام الصلاة وإيتاء الزكاة, ولو كان لابن آدم واد لأحب أن يكون له ثان " الحديث بتمامه , وهذا يحتمل أن يكون النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم أخبر به عن الله  تعالى على أنه من القرآن, ويحتمل أن يكون من  الأحاديث القدسية , والله أعلم  وعلى الأول فهو مما نسخت تلاوته  جزما  وإن كان حكمه مستمرا                                                                                                               

And it also occurred at Ahmad and Abi Ubayd in "Virtues of the Quran" from hadith Abi Waqid Al Labani who said "We used to go to the Prophet (peace be upon him) if something was revealed to him so he would tell us, so he told us that day: Allah says "We have sent down money for the establishment of prayer and payment of Zakat,  and if the son of Adam had a valley full of gold, he would like to have two valleys." that is the very hadith, and it is possible that the Prophet (peace be upon him) informed that this is a verse from the Quran, and it is also possible that it is from the Qudsi Hadith, and God knows if it is the first (meaning first explanation which states that it was part of the Quran) then it is what was abrogated from recitation even though its wisdom and rulings are still implemented. (Ibn Hajar Al Asqalani, Fathul Bari, Kitab: Al Rataaq, Bab: Maa Yataqee min Fitnatil Maal, Commentary on Hadith no. 5959, Source)

Again this just takes us to the whole issue of abrogation. Refer to my section here http://www.call-to-monotheism.com/qur_anic_variants. Or as the commentary says, it could be a Qudsi Hadith. What is a Qudsi Hadith? See this definition......

Hadith Qudsi are the sayings of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace and Blessings of Allah be upon him) as revealed to him by the Almighty Allah. Hadith Qudsi (or Sacred Hadith) are so named because, unlike the majority of Hadith which are Prophetic Hadith, their authority (Sanad) is traced back not to the Prophet but to the Almighty.

Among the many definitions given by the early scholars to Sacred Hadith is that of as-Sayyid ash-Sharif al-Jurjani (died in 816 A.H.) in his lexicon At-Tarifat where he says: "A Sacred Hadith is, as to the meaning, from Allah the Almighty; as to the wording, it is from the messenger of Allah (peace be upon him). It is that which Allah the Almighty has communicated to His Prophet through revelation or in dream, and he, peace be upon him, has communicated it in his own words. Thus Qur'an is superior to it because, besides being revealed, it is His wording." (Source) 

By quoting this narration Margoliouth intends to deduce that if the Prophet (Saw) can forget one verse at any time, it may possibly happen with other verses as well. Probably he also wants to indicate that the Quran did not exist in writing otherwise the Prophet (Saw) would not have forgotten that verse. But this objection is so absurd and baseless that even a man with ordinary intelligence will not accept it. Sometimes it does happen that man does remember something yet due to a prolonged dissociation with it, he does not have it fresh in his memory but as soon as someone mentions it, it becomes fresh in memory again. Actually this is not forgetfulness, but only a temporary dissociation of though. The same happened with the Holy Prophet (Saw). Terming it forgetfulness on the basis of such an incident is the height of travesty which is nothing but sheer bigotry. On the contrary, had Mr. Margoliouth viewed it with insight and justice he would have realised that this incident actually proves that Allah has safeguarded the Quran in such an extraordinary manner that no possibility exists for any part of it to become lost. The incident simply proves the reality that every single verse of the Quran was made to be memorised by so many people, that if a verse did not remain fresh in the memory of the Prophet (Saw) for the time being, there was no possibility of it getting lost.

The objection that this incident denotes that the Quran, at that time, did not exist in written form is even more unfounded and ridiculous: We have already pointed out that the only thing this incident says is that a verse was revived in the memory of the Holy Prophet (Saw) by its recitation by a Companion. It does not prove that the Quran was not found in written form. Does Mr. Margoliouth think that a thing once written can never become obscure from a persons mind for a short while? Further, the whole world knows that the Holy Prophet (Saw) did not know reading or writing. So, there was no connection between his remembrance of the Quran and its transcription, hence inference that the Quran did not exist in written form can be drawn from this incident only by a person who has closed the doors of justice and wisdom on himself.
 

 

   Conclusion

The Quran is preserved the way God had intended it to. When Muslims argue that the Quran has been passed down by memory of the early Muslims we are not talking about some kind of divine memory because they were human beings just like us. Some would forget. However, NOT ALL THE MUSLIMS WOULD FORGET the Quran. That's why every year in the month of Ramadan the Muslims recite the whole Quran in their Taraweeh prayers. Sometimes the Imam would make a mistake and then the people praying behind him would correct him. So if people ever forgot there were others to correct. This is how God Almighty kept the Quran preserved. 

Now as for this statement of the valley of riches. It is clear that it really was a hadith. A Qudsi hadith that is. A Qudsi hadith is still a revelation from God but in the wording of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). So it is possible that when the Prophet (peace be upon him) told them that Allah told him this statement they mistakenly believed that it was a Quranic revelation. Even if it was a Quranic revelation then its recitation became abrogated, its wisdom is still maintained.

 

Recommended Reading

http://www.load-islam.com/C/rebuttals/The_Problem_of_Abrogation_in_the_Quran/ 

http://www.islamic-paths.org/Home/English/Quran/History/Uloom_alQuran/Transmission.htm

http://muslim-canada.org/ch2hamid.pdf


----------------------------------------------


Praise be to Allah.

Firstly:

Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):

“We shall make you to recite (the Qur’an), so you (O Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him)) shall not forget (it),

Except what Allah may will, He knows what is apparent and what is hidden”

[al-A‘la 87:6-7].

Here Allah, may He be exalted, says to His Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) that He will teach him this Qur’an and cause him to memorise it so that he will not forget anything of it, except what Allah causes to be taken away and abrogated.

Ibn Jaziy (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

This is addressed to the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him); Allah promised him that He would make him recite the Qur’an so that he would not forget it. This is a miracle that was bestowed upon him (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), as he was unlettered and could not write, yet despite that he did not forget what Jibreel (peace be upon him) recited to him of the Qur’an. It was also said that the meaning of the verse is similar to the verse in which Allah says (interpretation of the meaning): “Move not your tongue concerning (the Qu’ran, O Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him)) to make haste therewith” [al-Qiyaamah 75:16]. The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) used to move his tongue as Jibreel recited it, for fear of forgetting it, so Allah guaranteed to him that he would not forget it. It was also said that the words “so you will not forget it” was a an command not to forget it, for Allah knew that not forgetting is not possible for human beings, and what was meant was a command to him to pay attention to it that he would not forget it – but this is far-fetched.

End quote from at-Tas-heel (p. 2597)

As-Sa‘di (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

That is, We will preserve what We have revealed to you of the Book, and We will instil it in your heart, so that you will forget nothing of it.

This was great glad tidings from Allah to His slave and Messenger Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), that Allah would teach him knowledge that he would not forget, “Except what Allah may will”, of what His wisdom may dictate that He should cause you to forget for a significant reason.

End quote from Tafseer as-Sa‘di (p. 920)

This is the forgetting from which the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) was protected, which is forgetting what he had been commanded to convey. This is what he would remember and not forget, until the religion was completed and the blessing was perfected.

Secondly:

with regard to the report narrated by al-Bukhaari (5038) and Muslim (788) from ‘Aa’ishah, who said: The Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) heard a man reciting at night and he said: “May Allah have mercy on him, for he has reminded me of such and such, a verse that I had been caused to forget in soorah such and such”,

This refers to the normal, natural kind of forgetting with which Adam (peace be upon him) and his offspring were created. That happened to the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) sometimes, and it is not what is referred to in the verse (interpretation of the meaning): “We shall make you to recite (the Qur’an), so you (O Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him)) shall not forget (it)” [al-A‘la 87:6].

An-Nawawi (may Allah have mercy on him) said: This indicates that it was possible for the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) to forget some of that which he had already conveyed to the ummah. End quote.

Al-Haafiz Ibn Hajar (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

Al-Ismaa‘eeli said: With regard to the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) forgetting some part of the Qur’an, that is of two types:

The first is what he might forget and then quickly remember. This is part of human nature, and is referred to in the words of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) in the hadith of Ibn Mas‘ood about forgetting: “I am only human like you; I forget as you forget.”

The second type is when Allah removed from his heart that which He wanted to abrogate from the Qur’an. This is referred to as the exception in the verse in which Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):

“We shall make you to recite (the Qur’an), so you (O Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him)) shall not forget (it),

Except what Allah may will”

[al-A‘la 87:6-7].

With regard to the first type, it is something temporary and is soon remembered, based on the apparent meaning of the verse in which Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning): “Verily We: It is We Who have sent down the Dhikr (i.e. the Quran) and surely, We will guard it (from corruption)” [al-Hijr 15:9].

With regard to the second type, it is included in the words of Allah, may He be exalted (interpretation of the meaning): “Whatever a Verse (revelation) do We abrogate or cause to be forgotten” [al-Baqarah 2:106].

End quote.

Ibn Baaz (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

The ummah is agreed that the Messengers were infallible in their conveying of the message, so they did not forget anything of that which Allah revealed to them, except something that was abrogated, and Allah, may He be glorified and exalted, guaranteed to His Messenger (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) that He would make him recite it so that he would not forget it, except something that Allah wanted to cause him to forget. He also guaranteed him that He would cause him to memorise the entire Qur’an. Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):

“We shall make you to recite (the Qur’an), so you (O Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him)) shall not forget (it),

Except what Allah may will, He knows what is apparent and what is hidden”

[al-A‘la 87:6-7]

“It is for Us to collect it and to give you (O Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him)) the ability to recite it (the Quran),

And when We have recited it to you (O Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) through Jibrael (Gabriel)), then follow you its (the Qurans) recital.”

[al-Qiyaamah 75:16-17].

End quote from Majmoo‘ Fataawa Ibn Baaz (6/371)

The point is that forgetting is of two types: forgetting in the sense of removal, abrogation and loss of the forgotten material altogether, which is what the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) was protected from, so that he did not forget anything of the Qur’an except what Allah willed that He should cause him to forget, of that which He wanted to remove and abrogate, which is what is referred to in the words(interpretation of the meaning):

“We shall make you to recite (the Qur’an), so you (O Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him)) shall not forget (it),

Except what Allah may will”

[al-A‘la 87:6-7].

This is what Ahl as-Sunnah are unanimously agreed did not happen to the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him).

The second type is the kind of forgetting that is part of human nature. This did happen to the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) on occasion, and this is what he referred to when he said: “I am only human like you; I forget as you forget. If I forget, then remind me.” Narrated by al-Bukhaari (386) and Muslim (889). And he also said:  “May Allah have mercy on him, for he has reminded me of such and such, a verse that I had been caused to forget in soorah such and such.” There is nothing problematic in this, because it did not affect the obligation to convey the message, so long as the verse or the thing that had been forgotten was preserved, and the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) would remember it soon after that. Hence he  (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) remembered it himself, as we see in the hadith mentioned, that he forgot something whilst he was praying and no one reminded him of it.

Please see also the answer is to questions no. 42216 and 127485

And Allah knows best.

Thursday, 19 October 2023

Explanation of the Apostasy punishment in Islam.

 

Explanation of the Apostasy punishment in Islam.

The Apostasy Punishment in Islam is one of the most misunderstood things about Islam today. Not only is there is no Apostasy punishment in Islam but also Islam permits freedom of religion.

This assumption of the Apostasy punishment is based of the following Hadith

Ibn ‘Abbas said:

“The Messenger of Allah [SAW] said: ‘Whoever changes his religion, kill him.”

[1] Sunan an-Nasa’i 4059

Right of the back people might also start making the assumption that this is a indication that Islam commands to kill Apostates.

However thats not the case at all. One needs to understand the historical context and meanings of this Hadith before jumping into conclusions.

The punishment for apostasy originated due to the dangerous phenomena of hypocrisy (nifaq) that threatened the community in Medina. Hypocrisy in this sense is not simply failing to live up to one’s stated moral standards, but rather this form of hypocrisy was the deliberate attempt by the enemies of Islam to pretend to be Muslims in order to infiltrate and harm the community.

A faction of the People of the Book say to each other: Believe in that which was revealed to the believers at the beginning of the day and reject it at its end that perhaps they will abandon their religion.

[2] Quran 3:72

Some of the Jews of Medina pretended to be Muslims outwardly with the intention of later publicizing their rejection of Islam in an attempt to shake the faith of newly converted Muslims. This was at a time when Medina was threatened with a war of extermination by the Quraish aristocracy.

Ibn Kathir writes:

Mujahid said this verse is regarding Jews who prayed the dawn prayer with the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, and they disbelieved at the end of the day as a plot to turn people away, such that it appeared as if they saw misguidance after entering the religion.

[3] Tafseer Ibn Kathir 3:72

Likewise, other hypocrites in Medina were spreading lies and rumors among the Muslims at a time when their unity was most needed. Such acts constituted a serious threat to the security of the community.

If the hypocrites and those in whose hearts is disease and those who spread rumors in Medina do not cease, We will surely let you overpower them. Then they will not remain your neighbors therein except for a little while.

[4] Quran 33:60

Therefore, the punishment for apostasy was prescribed in this specific context. It was not prescribed in order to punish the act of unbelief itself, as this is for Allah alone, but rather to protect the Muslims from the conspiracies of their enemies.

Apostasy is divided into two types: major and minor. Muslim scholars, using the Prophet’s traditions as their guide, have divided unbelief, idolatry, hypocrisy, and sin into major and minor categories. Likewise, there is a distinction between an apostate who intends to physically harm the community and an apostate who only spiritually harms himself.

Minor apostasy is when a person embraces Islam while knowing its virtues and later rejects it. There is no legal punishment for the minor apostate as long as they do not try to physically harm the Muslim community. Major apostasy is when a person embraces Islam while knowing its virtues and later rejects it and adds to this a call for violent rebellion against the Muslim authorities. Such a crime is equivalent to high treason and in its most severe case can carry the death penalty as an act of self-defense for the community.

Allah says in the Quran

Verily, those who believed and then disbelieved, then believed and then disbelieved and increased in disbelief, never will Allah forgive them nor will He guide them to a right way.

[5] Quran 4:137

In this verse, Allah describes a person who apostates from Islam twice and He does not prescribe legal punishment for him, but rather He only warns the apostate about severe punishment in the Hereafter. This demonstrates that the general rule is an apostate should be left alone.

Say: The truth is from your Lord. So whoever wills let him believe, and whoever wills let him disbelieve.

[6] Quran 18:29

Apostasy which punishment is required for is when a person embraces Islam and later leaves the religion while combining this with the political crime of treason. Legal punishment against such persons can only be carried out by a lawful authority according to due process, and it is not permissible for individual Muslims to carry out this punishment on their own.

The presence of political treason as a condition for punishment is made clear in an authentic tradition.

Abdullah ibn Mas’ud reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, applied legal punishment in the following case:

The one who leaves his religion and separates from the community.

[7] Sahih Muslim 1676, Grade: Sahih

The mention of one who “separates from the community” (al-mufariq lil-jama’ah) indicates that a person is not legally punished simply for leaving Islam, but rather for high treason against the Muslim community. This phrase is associated in other traditions with rejecting loyalty to the Muslim authority.

Ibn Umar reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said:

One who withdraws his obedience will meet Allah on the Day of Resurrection without an argument for him, and whoever dies without swearing allegiance will have died in ignorance.

[8] Sahih Muslim 1851, Grade: Sahih

In another version of this narration, the Prophet said:

Whoever dies while he has separated from the community (al-mufariq lil-jama’ah), then he has died in ignorance.

[9] Musnad Ahmad 5526, Grade: Sahih

Indeed, some of the companions interpreted the phrase this way and described an apostate as:

One who wages war against Allah and His Messenger.

[10] Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 4334, Grade: Sahih

From these Hadiths we can infer that one who “separates from the community” refers to one who “withdraws his obedience,” a treasonous action, not simply leaving the community as the bedouin of Medina had done.

The connection between apostasy and treason is made even clearer in a tradition in which the Prophet describes the apostate which punishment is required as:

A man who rejects Islam and wages war against Allah the Exalted and His Messenger.

[11] Sunan An-Nasa’i 4048

The companions understood this type of apostasy to involve war and sedition against the community.

Ibn Abbas said:

Whoever kills others, spreads corruption in the land, wages war against Allah and His Messenger, and joins the unbelievers before he is subdued, then there is nothing to prevent the legal punishment from being applied to him because of what he did.

[12] Sunan An-Nasa’i 4046, Grade: Sahih

Therefore, the death penalty was justified against such rebels who rejected lawful authority and committed treason against the community. This seemed to be implicitly understood by the early scholars, such as Imam Muslim who entitled a chapter of his Sahih:

“The ruling of those who wage war and commit apostasy.”

Likewise, Ibn Al-Qayyim associates apostasy with “aggression” and “assault” against religion, for which the death penalty was justified to protect lives.

Ibn Al-Qayyim writes:

As for the punishment of execution, it is reserved for the greatest offenses such as those against life, so that its punishment is of similar kind, such as the offense against the religion by assaulting it and apostatizing from it. This offense is the first to be punished by execution in order to restrain the aggression of the criminal by every punishment.

[13] I’lam Al-Muwaqi’een Volume 2 pg 74

Nevertheless, the death penalty was not uniformly applied by the Prophet and his companions. There were some cases when the ruling involved a lesser punishment or even a full pardon.

Ibn Abbas reported:

Abdullah ibn Sa’d ibn Abu Sarh would write to the Messenger of Allah but the devil deceived him and he joined the unbelievers. The Messenger of Allah ordered that he should be killed on the day of liberation, but Uthman ibn Affan sought protection for him, so the Messenger of Allah granted him protection.

 [14] Sunan Abu Dawud 4358, Grade: Sahih

In this example, the Prophet pardoned the apostasy of Abdullah ibn Sarh after Uthman sought protection for him. This indicates that the punishment for apostasy is not a firm legal punishment (hadd) for which there can be no intercession, but rather it is a discretionary punishment (ta’zeer) to be applied by a qualified judge.

Abdullah ibn Sarh eventually returned to Islam, demonstrating the Prophet’s wisdom in showing mercy and forbearance. The great jurists of early Islam recognized such cases.

Al-Bayhaqi reported:

Ash-Shafi’ee said: Some people believed and then committed apostasy and then displayed faith again and the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, did not kill them. Ahmad said: We have narrated this regarding Abdullah ibn Abi Sarh when Satan caused him to stumble and he joined the unbelievers, then he returned to Islam. We have also narrated this regarding another man from the Ansar.

[15] Ma’rifat As-Sunan wal Athar

Moreover some Muslim scholars did not prefer death penalty when it comes to apostates related to treason.

Sufyan Ath-Thawri reported:

Amr ibn Qais and Ibrahim Al-Nakha’i said: Regarding the apostate, he should be imprisoned indefinitely.

Sufyan said: This is what we adhere to.

[16] Musnaf Abdur Razzaq 18084

Moreover death penalty is NOT ascribed to female Apostates(who have performed treason)

Ibn Abi Shayba reported: Ata’ said regarding the female apostate:

She is not to be killed.

Hasan Al-Basri said: She is not to be killed.

[17] Musnaf Ibn Abi Shayba 32083

At-Tirmidhi records:

A group of scholars said the female apostate should be imprisoned and not killed. This is the opinion of Sufyan Ath-Thawri and others among the people of Kufa.

[18]  Sunan At-Tirmidhi 1458

Some the early jurists, such as As-Sarakhsi Al-Hanafi, highlighted the distinction between an apostate’s sin against Allah and his sin against the community, particularly as he argued that women apostates should not be killed because they do not post a threat against the community.

As-Sarakhsi writes:

The act of unbelief is among the greatest offences, but it is between the servant and his Lord. The recompense for it is delayed until the he reaches the abode of recompense. As for what occurs in this world, they are legislated policies for the welfare of people, such as legal retaliation for murder in order to protect life.

[19] Al-Mabsut Volume 10 pg 110

That is, the punishment for apostasy is not to punish unbelief in itself, but rather to protect the community from insurrection. Sheikh Mahmud Shaltut, the late Grand Sheikh of Al-Azhar University, also mentions this distinction and he adds that the solitary (ahad) narrations used to justify the death penalty in every case cannot overrule the far more numerous verses of the Quran.

Sheikh Mahmud Shaltut writes:

These narrations evoked various responses from the scholars, many of whom are in agreement that firm legal punishments (hudud) cannot be established by solitary narrations and that unbelief in itself does not warrant the death penalty. Indeed, the factor which determines the application of this punishment is aggression and hostility against the believers and the need to prevent possible sedition against religion. The obvious meaning in numerous verses of the Quran prohibit compulsion in religion.

[20] Al-Islam Aqidah wa Sharia 281

To summarize this

Ibn Humam writes:

It is necessary to punish apostasy with death in order to avert the evil of war, not as punishment for the act of unbelief, because the greatest punishment for that is with Allah. This punishment is specifically for those who wage war and this is for the man. For this reason, the Prophet prohibited killing women because they do not fight.

[21] Fath ul-Qadeer volume 6 pg 72

The jurists understood that legal punishments are not an end in themselves, but rather a means to achieve justice, welfare, and security. If it is possible to achieve these objectives without inflicting the maximum punishment, then it is highly recommended to do so.

Ibrahim Al-Nakha’i justified his preference for imprisonment over the death penalty, saying:

Avoid legal punishments upon the Muslims as much as you are able. If you find a way out for a Muslim, then leave it to him. Verily, for the judge to make a mistake pardoning the Muslims is better than to make a mistake punishing them.

[22]  Musnaf Abdur Razzaq 18085

This sentiment is consistent with the Prophetic teaching that it is better for a judge to err in forgiveness than in punishment.

Aisha reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said:

Avoid legal punishments upon the Muslims as much as you are able. If the criminal has a way out, then leave him to his way. Verily, it is better for the leader to make a mistake pardoning the criminal than it is for him to make a mistake punishing the innocent.

[23] Sunan At-Tirmidhi 1424, Grade: Sahih

Indeed, the Prophet described the true believers as the most restrained of people when it comes to taking life. The believers understand that life should only be taken when it is absolutely necessary.

Abdullah ibn Mas’ud reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said:

The most restrained of the people regarding killing are the people of faith.

[24] Musnad Ahmad 3720, Grade: Sahih

From all of this, we understand that the death penalty for apostasy should only be applied to extreme cases of treason and sedition in which such punishment is necessary for the safety of the community. The death penalty is the maximum punishment but lesser punishments or even a full pardon may be warranted by different circumstances.

Moreover Islam does not have any penalty for Apostasy if someone wishes change his faith just because he wills to join a new religion.

The Quran is pretty clear and explicit on this fact.

There is no compulsion in religion. The truth is distinct from error.

[25] Quran 2:256

Muhammad Rashid Rida writes:

This is a major rule among the principles of the religion of Islam and a great pillar among the pillars of administration. It is not permissible to force anyone to enter the religion and it is not allowed to expel anyone among his people from his religion.

[26] Tafseer Al-Manar 2:256

This verse is also not abrogated as many falsely claim as we can see.

Moreover the Prophet also never forced anyone to convert to Islam.

Anas ibn Malik reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said to a man
Embrace Islam. The man said, “I find that I dislike it.” The Prophet said: Even if you dislike it.

[27] Musnad Ahmad 11650, Grade: Sahih

In this tradition, the Prophet did not call the man to Islam using threats or intimidation, but rather by telling him that Islam is good for him even if he disliked it.

Ibn Al Qayyim writes:

The Prophet never forced the religion upon anyone, but rather he only fought those who waged war against him and fought him first. As for those who made peace with him or conducted a truce, then he never fought them and he never compelled them to enter his religion.

[28] Hidayat Al-Hayara 237

There is another instance where some one apostatized and the Prophet allowed.

Jabir reported: A bedouin came to the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, and gave the pledge of allegiance for embracing Islam. The next day he came with a fever and said, “Please cancel my pledge.” The Prophet refused three times and he said: Medina is like a furnace. It expels its impurities and collects what is pure.

[29] Sahih Bukhari 1784, Grade: Sahih

In this example, a man rejected Islam after embracing it but the Prophet did not apply legal punishment to him. Rather he gave us a impression that even if that leaves Islam more will join it.

Furthermore, cases of major apostasy do not necessitate the death penalty if a single Muslim seeks protection for the apostate.

Ibn Abbas reported:

Abdullah ibn Sa’d ibn Abi Sarh would write to the Messenger of Allah but the devil deceived him and he joined the unbelievers. The Messenger of Allah ordered that he should be killed on the day of liberation, but Uthman ibn Affan sought protection for him, so the Messenger of Allah granted him protection.

[30] Sunan Abu Dawud 4358, Grade: Sahih

Note: This apostate was an Apostate who committed high treason(which is the Apostasy punishable by death) but despite that Uthman gave him protection

Moreover we see other Muslim rulers not giving any penalty for people commit apostasy.

Umar Ibn Al Khattab:

Anas ibn Malik reported: I said, “O commander of the faithful, some people have turned renegade against Islam and joined the idolaters. What is to be done to them other than killing?” Umar ibn al-Khattab, may Allah be pleased with him, said, “That I take hold of them on peaceful terms is more beloved to me than everything over which the sun rises, from the horizon to the zenith.” I said, “O commander of the faithful, what would you do if you took hold of them?” Umar said, “I would offer them the door through which they exited, that they would enter it again. If they did so, I would accept it from them; otherwise I would keep them in prison.”

[31] Muṣannaf ‘Abd al-Razzāq 18696
Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Ibn Kathir

So here we can see that Umar Ibn Al Khattab. The 2nd Rashidum Caliph handled apostasy peacefully.

There was a also a another instance where this happened when someone killed apostates even Umar Ibn Al Khattab did not command to.

Muhammad ibn al-Qari reported: A man came to Umar ibn al-Khattab, may Allah be pleased with him, from Abu Musa al-Ashari. Umar asked him about the people and he informed him. Then, Umar said, “Do you have any recent news?” Abu Musa said, “Yes, a man turned back to unbelief after his Islam.” Umar said, “What have you done with him?” Abu Musa said, “We let him approach and we struck his neck.” Umar said, “Did you not imprison him for three days and feed him each day with bread and call him to repent and return to the command of Allah?” Then, Umar said, “O Allah, I was not present and I did not command it and I was not pleased when I heard it!”

[32] al-Muwaṭṭa’ 1397 by Imam Malik Grade: Hasan (fair) according to Al-Albani

Umar Abdul Aziz(Umar II)

Ma’mar reported: Some residents of the peninsula told me that some people had embraced Islam, but it was not long until they became apostates. Maymun ibn Mihran wrote to Umar Ibn Abdul Aziz, may Allah have mercy on him, regarding them and Umar wrote back saying, “Let them return to paying tribute and leave them alone.”

[33] Muṣannaf ‘Abd al-Razzāq 18102

So we can clearly him leaving them alone. Which obviously proves Islam never had any religious apostasy penalty except for high treason which was political purposes.

In conclusion, the death penalty for apostasy is restricted by the Prophet’s other statements and actions which make clear that this punishment applies only to those who commit high treason against the Muslim community.

Source:

[1] Sunan an-Nasa’i 4059

[2] Quran 3:72

[3] Tafseer Ibn Kathir 3:72

[4] Quran 33:60

[5] Quran 4:137

[6] Quran 18:29

[7] Sahih Muslim 1676

[8] Sahih Muslim 1851

[9] Musnad Ahmad 5526

[10] Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 4334

[11] Sunan An-Nasa’i 4048

[12] Sunan An-Nasa’i 4046

[13] I’lam Al-Muwaqi’een Volume 2 pg 74

[14] Sunan Abu Dawud 4358

[15] Ma’rifat As-Sunan wal Athar

[16] Musnaf Abdur Razzaq 18084

[17] Musnaf Ibn Abi Shayba 32083

[18]  Sunan At-Tirmidhi 1458

[19] Al-Mabsut Volume 10 pg 110

[20] Al-Islam Aqidah wa Sharia 281

[21] Fath ul-Qadeer 6 volume 6 pg 72

[22] Musnaf Abdur Razzaq 18085

[23] Sunan At-Tirmidhi 1424

[24] Musnad Ahmad 3720

[25] Quran 2:256

[26] Tafseer Al-Manar 2:256

[27] Musnad Ahmad 11650

[28] Hidayat Al-Hayara 237

[29] Sahih Bukhari 1784

[30] Sunan Abu Dawud 4358

[31] Muṣannaf ‘Abd al-Razzāq 18696

[32] al-Muwaṭṭa’ 1397 by Imam Malik

[33] Muṣannaf ‘Abd al-Razzāq 18102




Where can I find the Injeel?

The argument “Where is the Injeel?” is an absurd rhetorical claim that doesn’t make any sense, as we will demonstrate. Christians often disp...