was the Torah present during the time of Samuel?

(Previously in Israel, a person would say when he went to inquire of God, "Come on! Let's go to the seer!" because the person known as a prophet today was formerly called a seer.) (1 Samuel 9:9)

-------------------

the aboive saying seems to confirms that during the time of Samuel the Torah of Moses was not present with them. Notice how the above says " PREVIOUSLY IN ISRAEL" that is in the past, secondly if a man wanted to inquire of God he will go to a seer! Now known as a prophet?

What's fascinating about the above verse is that had Samuel known of the Torah of Moses then he would of seen the word Prophet is mentioned many times not seer! In fact the word seer is only found in the book of Samuel?

-------------

Was Samuel not aware of the much controversial passage from Deuteronomy 18

I will raise up for them a prophet like you from among their fellow Israelites, and I will put my words in his mouth. He will tell them everything I command him. (Deuteronomy 18:18 Masoretic Torah)

Here we read Yahweh saying he will raise a PROPHET (נָבִ֨יא) Nabi not SEER. That was one of many many other verses which speaks of Prophets and nowhere is seer mentioned that's according to the Masoretic.

In short 1 Samuel 9:9 the word “Prophet” was not used before Samuel the prophet, yet we find the word “prophet” all through the Torah, indicating we don’t have the “real” law of Moses. This tells us that the original Torah was not with Samuel !

Sorry to be harsh!

Feel real sorry for African Christians with all due respect either way they are lost... Take for instant this nasara by the name of prince David Marcus. Since he's new to Christianity he's using old Christian missionary busted tactics which have been destroyed by Muslims centuries ago...

He is bringing up the same old debunked claims how can Mary Pbuh be the sister of Aaron Pbuh? Even though he's posted the Hadith which explains the verse this nasara wants to mock.. And what makes me laugh is on his post he wrote " EVEN SISTER OR BROTHER IS INAPPROPRIATE AND NOT USED IN HEBREW"? Really Marcus lol lets use his own bible to destroy this pea brained street evangelist lol

----------------

Thou shalt not abhor an Edomite; for he is thy brother: thou shalt not abhor an Egyptian; because thou wast a stranger in his land. (Deuteronomy 23:7)

So the Edomites should not be despised because they are your brother what the whole tribe?

-----------------

And when Abram heard that his brother lot was taken captive, he armed his trained servants, born in his own house, three hundred and eighteen, and pursued them unto Dan. (Genesis 14:14)

And he brought back all the goods, and also brought again his brother Lot, and his goods, and the women also, and the people. (Genesis 14:12)

So Abram said to Lot, "Please let there be no strife between you and me, nor between my herdsmen and your herdsmen, for we are brothers.

(Genesis 13:8)

So Abrahams nephew Lot is also his brother?

------------

For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother."

(Matthew 12:50)

So anyone who follows Jesus is his brother and sister or mother ?

-----------

In the time of Herod king of Judea, there was a priest named Zechariah, who belonged to the priestly division of Abijah, and whose wife Elizabeth was a daughter of Aaron.

(Luke 1:5)

Was she really the daughter of Aaron ? Or descendent now imagine if we start playing those pathetic games how will u react!!   

------------

He will be a FRUITFUL MAN; his hand will be with everyone and everyone's hand will be with him, and he will live among all his brothers."

(Genesis 16:12 Samaritan text) 

How many brothers did Ishmael Pbuh have?

--------------

"I have become a brother to jackals And a companion of ostriches.

(Job 30:29)

Was he really the brother of jackals ?

Something to ponder on

The word Judaism is not found in the Old Testament, nor is Judaism called a Religion in the Old Testament so what religion did Moses present to the children of Israel  I.e Nation to follow?

Now one may say just because the Old Testament doesn't use the word Judaism doesn't mean people wasn't aware of it, take for instance the New Testament we find Judaism in there. But notice Judaism is only spoken by Paul? Not even Jesus himself nor the gospels uttered such a word?. Secondly the questions authenticity depends on the Old Testament the entire codex has no mention of such a religion how comes ? 

---------------

Here comes the blow 

What religion did the prophets of the Old Testament follow is not mentioned, nor does the Old Testament distinguish their belief status other then calling them righteous, upright, perfect, servants etc... Now what makes you say they did not follow Islam as their religion since being righteous, upright, prefect is following the right path o.e monotheism which is the religion of ISLAM...

Christians say there is no Islam in the bible nor is Judaism found in the Tanack shall we conclude Moses and his people did not have a religion? 

Do Christians live up to what Jesus said?

If a man uses physical force on  a woman I.e tries to rape her,  is her husband allowed to fight the man? or should he stand and pray without getting into type of violence. this is supposed to be the teaching of a true christian. Christians claim, Jesus never fought anyone rather he used love and said forgive those who persecute you  and pray for them.

listen, I say: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. (Luke 6:27-28)

-------------

Just out of curiosity are Christians allowed to defend their family by beating or fighting the assailant, If so where did Jesus during his ministry prescribe self defence? you think you can then the above teaching is a lie and cannot be literal! 

We know what the Old Testament says about defending ones rights and protecting the family, but since Christians don't follow the laws or rules of the Old Testament or as they like to say the old covenant where does Jesus teach self defence  and family protection by physical action?

Ask yourself can you really watch your wife or daughter get raped in front of you, and all you can do is pray for the man!. when in reality you can do something about it. Can such practice be applied in this day and age. Which mad man would follow such a teaching.

It gets worse Jesus of the Bible goes as far as saying if one slaps you on one cheek turn the other?

If someone slaps you on one cheek, turn to them the other also. If someone takes your coat, do not withhold your shirt from them. (Luke 6:29)

Seriously! How many Christians would turn their other cheek? Do you see the problem the gospels writers have created. They are pretending to created this fantasy dream land where every Christians is supposed to look like the innocent loving caring forgiving human! Whereas in reality it's a lie. No Christians in the planet practice such a commandment.. And the most ironic part is Jesus himself did not practice this. Remember when the official slapped him on the cheek did he turn the Other? NOOO rather he said why was he slapped :

When Jesus said this, one of the officials nearby slapped him in the face. “Is this the way you answer the high priest?” he demanded.

“If I said something wrong,” Jesus replied, “testify as to what is wrong. But if I spoke the truth, why did you strike me?” (John 18:22-23)

Who do you blame for such lies, Who's the route of the Problem? We can conclude the authors are  to be blamed who the route of the problem 

The New Testament was not inspired by the Holy Ghost !.

The bible clearly shows  its inconsistency It's full of blunders and errancy. Below I'll prove to you the so called gospels were not inspired by the Holy Spirit, it's a man made product for the ignorants. Let's expose the lies Christians make on how their bible is Inspired, a claim which only backfires on them!

---------------------

but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will never be forgiven; they are guilty of an eternal sin." (Mark  3:29)

In short you say something bad, vulgar about the Holy Spirit then your In trouble right. Well what if the Holy Spirit  is lying himself what then?? Does the Holy Spirit contradict itself,  LETS FIND OUT?

And they all forsook him, and fled. (Mark 14:50)

In other words the followers of jesus all forsook him deserted him like cowards. So how do we know who witnessed Jesus's trial If all the disciples fled Ahhhhnh yes the Holy Spirit inspired the writers right???

WRONG!!!!  

Let's read how the Holy Spirit contradicts itself making it a lier Which only means that its cannot be trusted and only deceived the writers:

Did Jesus Speak at His Hearing Before Pilate?

Meanwhile Jesus stood before the governor, and the governor asked him, "Are you the king of the Jews?" "Yes, it is as you say," Jesus replied. When he was accused by the chief priests and the elders, he gave no answer. Then Pilate asked him, "Don’t you hear the testimony they are bringing against you?" But Jesus made no reply, not even to a single charge— to the great amazement of the governor. 

(Matthew 27:11)

In Matthew gospelJesus doesn’t answer to the charges made against him  But according to John he does?

"You are a king, then!" said Pilate. Jesus answered, "You are right in saying I am a king. In fact, for this reason I was born, and for this I came into the world, to testify to the truth. Everyone on the side of truth listens to me."(John 18:37)

So no we have a major problem the verses above show us the Holy Spirit not only gave the writers false info he's also  deceiving thousands of Christians 

(No wonder Paul wasn't aware if he had the Holy Spirit )

In my judgment, she is happier if she stays as she is--and I think that I too have the Spirit of God. (1 Corinthians 7:40)

--------------

Christians fall into a serious dilemma since they claim to be inspired by the very same Holy Ghost. This also shows what kind of a mess the bible is very unreliable.

What were the names of the disciples?

Matthew 10:2 & Mark 3:16	Luke 6:14
1 – Simon the Cananean	1 – Simon called Peter
2 – Simon called Peter	2 – Andrew his brother
3 – Andrew	3 – James the son of Zabadee
4 – James son of Zabadee	4 – John his brother
5 – John	5 – Philip
6 – Philip	6 – Bartholomew
7 – Bartholomew	7 – Matthew the tax collector
8 – Matthew	8 – Thomas
9 – Thomas	9 – James the son of Alphaues
10 – James son of Alphaues	10 – Simon the Zealot
11 – Labaous called Thadaues	11 – Judas the son of James
12 – Judas the Escariot	12 – Judas the Escario

It is stated in Matthew that Simon the Cananean was a disciple, whereas in Luke Simon the Zealot is mentioned. Also Matthew states Labaous called Thadaues to be a disciple, but Luke makes no mention of this name, rather Judas the son of James is stated instead.

Below the Talmud tells us there was only five disciples ?

Talmud Sanhedrin 43a  It is taught: Yeshu had five disciples - Matai, Nekai, Netzer, Buni, and Todah.

Another biblical dilemma, also have you notice Luke and Mark are not mentioned as a disciple? 

Did a Roman soldier shed Jesus’ blood?

Answer: John 19:34 claims that “one of the soldiers pierced his [Jesus’] side with a spear, and immediately there came out blood and water.” According to John 19:33, the Roman soldiers did not break Jesus’ legs because he was already dead. Chronologically, John 19:33 established the time of the inflicting of the wound in Jesus’ side (John 19:34) as subsequent to his death. John’s sequence of events is contradicted in some manuscript versions of Matthew 27:49 which state, “And another took a spear and pierced his side, and there came out water and blood.” This addition to the verse places the time of the inflicting of the wound as prior to Jesus’ death. However, it is an interpolation unsupported by the best of the ancient New Testament manuscripts. Blood oozing from a wound inflicted after death does not qualify as the shedding of blood required of an atonement offering. The piercing of Jesus’ body by a spear did not cause his death. Jesus did not die as a result of blood loss (Matthew 27:46-50, Mark 15:34-37, Luke 23:46, John 19:28-30). Jesus’ blood was not shed by a Roman soldier’s spear, thrust into his side.

Biblically, sacrificial death could only occur through the shedding of blood exclusively (Leviticus 17:11). Jesus, death by crucifixion can not be considered a sacrificial death. His death may have been caused by either asphyxiation or by going into “shock brought on by the traumatic physical events of his last hours, before and after he was nailed to the cross.”4 In his case, shock would not have been brought on solely by blood loss. The Gospels indicate Jesus’ blood was not shed to a degree that would make blood loss from the body the exclusive cause of death. Death solely by blood loss is the only biblical cause acceptable for an animal’s sacrificial death. 

The Law is considered by the New Testament to have been completely fulfilled by Jesus (Matthew 5:17-18). Complete fulfillment could only occur with the moment of Jesus’ death (John 19:30). That death is considered the culmination of the Law (Romans 10:4; Galatians 3:24-25; Ephesians 1:7; Hebrews 10:12, 14). Everything occurring to Jesus prior to that moment would have had to be under the Law. Yet, neither the physical condition (blemished), the age (over thirty years of age), the date (Nisan 15), the location (outside Jerusalem and its Temple), the executioners (Romans), the method (crucifixion), nor the cause of Jesus’ death (either asphyxiation or shock), is in accordance with that prescribed by the Scriptures for the sacrificing of a paschal lamb. Therefore, the Law was not fulfilled in Jesus. The evidence shows that he could not be equated with the paschal lamb.

This is sufficient to prove that Jesus did not shed his blood for the sins of mankind, thus Christians are in a dilemma 

How many Christians are there that can prove their love by giving up their life?

You all say Iraqis christians are being persecuted and many others from all over the world and you have the Noon arabic alphabet display on your whatsapp and facebook pic, Well prove your love and go save them giving up your life!! That's exactly what your jesus said :

-----------------------------------------------------------

We know what real love is because Jesus gave up his life for us. So we also ought to give up our lives for our brothers and sisters.

(1 john 3:16)

Greater love has no one than this: to lay down one's life for one's friends.

(John 15:13)

THOUGHT SO COWARDS!!! 

The Ascension of Jesus later added in the gospels so where did he go?

Christians brag Jesus is in heaven, not Muslim but Christians they go as far as saying where is your Prophet or all the other prophets Pbut, and where's Jesus... The same tape is always played by them.. Let's analyse what the gospels really say

--------------------------------

After the Lord Jesus had spoken to them, he was taken up into heaven and he sat at the right hand of God.(Mark 16:19)

While he was blessing them, he left them and was taken up into heaven.

(Luke 24:51)

--------------------------------

Biblical Scholars commentary 

(ASCENSION TO HEAVEN IS LATER ADDED)

The ascension of Jesus up to Heaven does not actually appear in the original forms of any of the gospels. It was not until 200 years after the supposed event took place that the ascension was added to later copies of Mark and Luke. Mark originally ends with the discovery of an empty tomb. Mathew and John remain to have no mention of the ascension into heaven.

Mark 16:9-20 where Jesus ascends bodily to heaven is not in the earlier scriptures but rather was added later. None of the earliest scriptures that we have such as the Alexandrian Unical Mss, Vaticanus, and Sinaiticus have versus 9-20, they all just end at 16:8. Also early Christian writers noted that the ascension was not in the earliest manuscripts. Jerome and Eusebius both state that the best manuscripts available to them did not contain the extended ending. Also there are significant linguistic and stylistic differences between 9-20 and the rest of Mark. As noted on page 103 of "An Introduction to the New Testament" by new testament scholar Douglas J. Moo, the longer ending also contains several non-Markan words and expressions.

"and carried up into heaven" has been omitted by the RSV marg. (1946 Edition omits the words in the text), Ne, GN marg., NASV, NEB. Hills (3) p 123, (38) p 70, states that the words are omitted by Aleph, D, the Old Latin version (i.e. 5 copies-see Burgon, above) and the Sinaitic Syriac manuscript. Ruckman (2) p 96, (54) p 39, states that the words are contained by Papyrus 75, A, B. C, E, F, G, Theta and the vast majority of manuscripts, the Old Latin, the Vulgate, the Old Syriac (i.e. Peshitta) and Tatian's Diatessaron (180 AD).

In the 1952 RSV Mark 16 ends at verse 8 and the rest is relegated in small print to a footnote (more on this later). Similarly, in the commentary on the verses of Luke 24, we are told in the footnotes of the NRSV Bible "Other ancient authorities lack "and was carried up into heaven'" and "Other ancient authorities lack 'and worshipped him'". Thus, we see that the verse of Luke in its original form only said:

"While he blessed them, he parted from them. And they returned to Jerusalem with great joy."

It took centuries of "inspired correction" to give us Luke 24:51-52 in their current form.

----------------------------------------------------

From the above scholarly papers, it's agreed the ascension is not found in the earliest manuscripts, which tells us the authors were not aware of Jesus ascending to heaven or being taken up? SO WHAT REALLY HAPPENED?  

seems like Christians  are not aware of there own scriptures and they start jumping around on ours.. I hope Christians stop asking questions about where is your Prophet or any Prophets Pbut now, since they themselves have to answer where did their Jesus go according to the gospels missing episode..

(Footnote)

In the gospel, Luke recounts the ascension of Jesus on Easter Sunday night, thereby closely associating it with the resurrection.

BUT, in Acts 1:3, 9-11; 13:31 he historicizes the ascension by speaking of a forty-day period between the resurrection and the ascension. The Western text omits some phrases in Luke 24:51, 52 perhaps to avoid any chronological conflict with Acts 1 about the time of the ascension.

Yahweh lied to Moses about his name?

Interestingly we find a passage in the Torah where YAHWEH IS CAUGHT LYING TO MOSES, YES LYING !!!!!!  Don't believe me the evidence is below where yahweh tells moses that  Abraham, isaac and Jacob were unaware of the name Yahweh, however after reading the books first book of the pentateuch we find they were aware of the name yahweh and those before them!

----------------------

I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob as El-Shaddai--'God Almighty'--but I did not reveal my name, Yahweh, to them.

(Exodus 6:3)

-----------------------

From there he moved on to the hill country east of Bethel and pitched his tent, with Bethel on the west and Ai on the east. He built an altar to Yahweh there, and he called on the name of Yahweh. (Genesis 12;8)

He also said to him, "I am the LORD, (Yahweh) who brought you out of Ur of the Chaldeans to give you this land to take possession of it." (Genesis 15:7)

Abraham named the place Yahweh-Yireh (which means "the LORD will provide"). To this day, people still use that name as a proverb: "On the mountain of the LORD it will be provided." (Genesis 22:14) 

So he built an altar there, called on the name of Yahweh, and pitched his tent there. Isaac's slaves also dug a well there. ( Genesis 26:25)

Adam made love to his wife Eve, and she became pregnant and gave birth to Cain. She said, "With the help of the LORD (Yahweh) I have brought forth a man."

(Genesis 4:1)

Seth also had a son, and he named him Enosh. At that time people began to call on the name of the LORD. (Yahweh). (Genesis 4:26)

---------------------

Now that's what you call the master of liars... The very god who lied to his messenger how could u trust such a god to be true to you? Note all the above passages say Yahweh in the hebrew text and not Elohim or Eli. Etc....now the golden question is why would yahweh lie and what gain does he get from it?

Messiah not found in the Old Testament...

Why don't the Jews believe in Jesus as the Messiah? The fact the Old Testament (Tanach) does not mention of a messiah getting crucified hence, the Jewish authorities will not believe in such a Messiah, thus, they do not see him in the Scripture they study. Listen to how Paul explains the “blindness of the Jews”:

12 Therefore, since we have such a hope, we behave with great boldness, 13 and not like Moses who used to put a veil over his face to keep the Israelites from staring at the end of the glory that was fading away. 14 But their minds were closed. For to this very day, the same veil remains when they hear the old covenant read. It has not been removed because only in Christ is it taken away. 15 But until this very day whenever Moses is read, a veil lies over their minds; 16 but whenever anyone turns to the Lord, the veil is removed. 17 Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is present, there is freedom. 18 And we all, with unveiled faces reflecting the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from one degree of glory to another, which is from the Lord, who is the Spirit (2 Corinthians 3:12-18).

--------------------

Did you notice how Paul testifies the Jews had not found the Messiah in their bible! This isn't something new since the gospels even tell us that the Jews were not aware that the Son of man I.e Jesus was going to leave?

The crowd spoke up, “We have heard from the Law that the Messiah will remain forever, so how can you say, ‘The Son of Man must be lifted up’? Who is this ‘Son of Man’?” (John 12:34)

Why would the Jews of that time speak the contrary to what Jesus was saying,Mir they had it all written in their bible?. Even Peter the Rock was not sure what was going on? He even rebuked Jesus for even suggesting that the messiah will be crucified.

Peter took him aside and began to rebuke him. "Never, Lord!" he said. "This shall never happen to you!" (Matthew 16:22)

Christians say Jesus was mentioned in the Old Testament? If that's the case why did they doubt? Surely they should of been waiting for such a fulfilment right! Why did Peter rebuke Jesus when Jesus apparently mentioned he has to suffer! Surely Peter should of accepted it right?? Unless he knew the messiah has to live and not get crucified!!!!  

---------------------

It seems like even Christians are blind when it comes to the New Testament, here's another dilemma according Luke Jesus said the law of Moses & other prophets all spoke everything about him? 

Then he said to them, “These are my words that I spoke to you while I was still with you, that everything written about me in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled.” (Luke 24:44)

This is probably the reason the Jews reject anything and everything the New Testament says. Where is this passage found in the Law of Moses? The answer is nowhere!. Says a lot about the authenticity of both books. But the main point to focus on is why did the Jews not find Jesus in their bible? Either it was taken out which means its corrupted or it's never been in their book which shows the New Testament lied and made up saying to fit their agenda?

Luke 24:44-46