According to the bible Breast feeding is allowed by men's How absurd is that!!

"Have I conceived all this people? have I begotten them, that thou shouldest say unto me, Carry them in thy bosom, as a nursing father beareth the sucking child, unto the land which thou swarest unto their fathers?" (Numbers 11:12)

Obviously, a nursing father is a sight that must have been at least occasionally seen during those times or else there would have been no point to the metaphor Moses was trying to construct.

"And kings shall be thy nursing fathers, and their queens thy nursing mothers: they shall bow down to thee with their face toward the earth, and lick up the dust of thy feet; and thou shalt know that I am the LORD: for they shall not be ashamed that wait for me." (Isaiah 49:23)

Here's one more verse: "One dieth in his full strength, being wholly at ease and quiet. His breasts are full of milk, and his bones are moistened with marrow"

In this verse, breasts full of milk signify good health and full strength. Men, how is YOUR strength? (Job 21:24)

----------------------------------------------------------------

Christians are ignorant of the New Testament’s portrayal of Jesus; and they are ignorant of the documents hidden by the Church, namely the Gospel of Philip which records the love affair between Jesus and Mary Magdalene. The book of Revelation is probably the most degrading book; it contains a passage that describes Jesus having woman breasts!

And I turned to see the voice that spake with me. And being turned, I saw seven golden candlesticks; And in the midst of the seven candlesticks one like unto the Son of man, clothed with a garment down to the foot, and girt about the paps (mastos) with a golden girdle. (Revelations 1:13)

Let us analyze the passage closely; Jesus is described as having “paps” with a golden girdle. But what are paps? According to the Oxford Dictionary, it basically means the “breasts”.  There is evidence to show that “paps” exclusively refers to woman breasts.

Here is the lexicon for “paps”

Strong’s Number: 3149

Transliterated Word:

Mastos

 Phonetic

mas-tos' 

Definition:

the breasts

the breasts (nipples) of a man

breasts of a women

The word “paps” could refer to both male and female breasts, but the New Testament applies the Greek word “mastos” to woman only!

And it came to pass, as he spake these things, a certain woman of the company lifted up her voice, and said unto him, Blessed is the womb that bare thee, and the paps (mastos) which thou hast sucked. (Luke 11:27)

For, behold, the days are coming, in the which they shall say, Blessed are the barren, and the wombs that never bare, and the paps (mastos) which never gave suck. (Luke 23:29)

Since the New Testament never applies the word “paps” to males, the verse Revelation 1:13 does speak of Jesus having female breasts! Now if the author of Revelation wanted to say Jesus has MALE breasts, he should’ve used the Greek word “stethos”, which simply means “breast”.

And the publican, standing afar off, would not lift up so much as his eyes unto heaven, but smote upon his breast (stethos), saying, God be merciful to me a sinner. (Luke 18:13)

Simon Peter therefore beckoned to him, that he should ask who it should be of whom he spake. He then lying on Jesus' breast (stethos) saith unto him, Lord, who is it? (John 13:25)

Then Peter, turning about, seeth the disciple whom Jesus loved following; which also leaned on his breast (stethos) at supper, and said, Lord, which is he that betrayeth thee? (John 21:20)

The difference is that “stethos” defines any breast, but “mastos” only refers to female breasts. The perverted author of Revelations decided to use the word “mastos” and not “stethos”.

The scholar Tom Harper comments on Revelations 1:13

Revelation 1:13, in the King James Version, says, “And I saw in the midst of the seven candlesticks one like unto the Son of Man, clothed with a garment down to the foot, and girt about the paps with a golden girdle”. “Paps” is the archaic word for a woman’s breasts. In the Greek, the word used is the plural mastos, which the lexicon defines as “the breast, esp., of the swelling breast of a woman”. Rarely, the plural was used to refer to a man’s breasts, but the prevailing sense is female. The fact that the figure in this passage from Revelation wore a “girdle”, or cincture, about the breasts—the modern equivalent would be a brassiere—confirms that the breasts in question are female. Indeed, the New English Bible translates the plural as though it were a singular—“with a golden girdle round his breast”. The New Revised Standard Version tried to avoid any embarrassment by wrongly translating it as “chest”. (The Pagan Christ, p. 211)

It is interesting to note that Revelations also contains a passage that speaks of angels having breasts!

And the seven angels came out of the temple, having the seven plagues, clothed in pure and white linen, and having their breasts (stethos) girded with golden girdles. (Revelations 15:6)

Do angels have breasts? The passage doesn’t use the Greek word “mastos”, so the author is simply describing the breasts (non-female) of angels. Yet the verse Revelation 1:13 blatantly describes Jesus as a woman.

Genesis 30:21 read midrah leah had a boy who was changed into a girl Dinah

 

Yevamoth 64a/b states Abraham and Sarah non binary

 

Rabecca is called a he in genesis when she is first spoken to

 

Genesis 1:27 Adam is no binary read Midrash       

 

Esther 2:7, Question 1. Why does the verse use the strange word “omein” (“nursed”) to describe Mordechai’s care for Esther?

According to the bible Moses had horns coming out of his head?

Here's another example on when I ask Christians how well versed are you with the Hebrew bible, and how do you interpret the Hebrews texts?. The problems that we find it most Christians don't have a clue of their own bible. They don't know Hebrew nor have they been taught to read from the original language so what happens they get stuck on certain verses and passages which create a bigger problem when they start to interpret it their own way which is not the correct method the way the Jews interpret.

Take for instance this passage from the Torah :

And it came to pass, when Moses came down from mount Sinai with the two tables of testimony in Moses' hand, when he came down from the mount, that Moses wist not that the skin of his face shone while he talked with him. And when Aaron and all the children of Israel saw Moses, behold, the skin of his face shone; and they were afraid to come nigh him. (Exodus 34:29-30 KJV)

The above passage is a very bad English Translation, either the translators did not know Hebrew or they deliberately hid the actual Hebrew text to save themselves from embarrassment. You may wonder what's so extraordinary about the above passage? It seems pretty straight forward Moses got the tablets from mount Sinai and his face was shining?.  Let's show how Christians fail to understand the actual text since they are u aware of the Hebrew language. 

According to Exodus 34:29-30 Moses came down from Mount Sinai with the two tablets and his FACE WAS SHINING!. Was his face really shining? according to the Hebrew text it wasn't rather he had HORNS coming out of his Face the Hebrew text used in Exodus 34:29-30 is קָרַ֖ן ka·ran HORNS. 

Here's a literal translation of the texts :

And when Aaron and all the children of Israel saw Moses, behold, the skin of his face had HORNS; and they were afraid to come nigh him. (Exodus 34:30)

--------------------

Blue letter bible : קָרַן qâran, kaw-ran'; a primitive root; to push or gore; used only as denominative from H7161, to shoot out horns; figuratively, rays:—have horns, shine

Even the Latin vulgate Torah translates the texts as horns 

And when Moses came down from the Mount Sinai, he held the two tables of the testimony, and he knew not that his face was horned from the conversation of the Lord. And Aaron and the children of Israel seeing the face of Moses horned, were afraid to come near. (Exodus 34:29-30 Latin vulgate)

How about the same word being used in other books found in the bible:

And the LORD said unto Samuel, How long wilt thou mourn for Saul, seeing I have rejected him from reigning over Israel? fill thine HORN with oil, and go, I will send thee to Jesse the Bethlehemite: for I have provided me a king among his sons.

(1 Samuel 16:1)

And his brightness was as the light; he had HORNS coming out of his hand: and there was the hiding of his power. (Habakkuk 3:4) 

And it shall come to pass, that when they make a long blast with the ram's HORN, and when ye hear the sound of the trumpet, all the people shall shout with a great shout; and the wall of the city shall fall down flat, and the people shall ascend up every man straight before him. (Joshua 6:5)

And Zedekiah the son of Chenaanah made him HORNS of iron: and he said, Thus saith the LORD, With these shalt thou push the Syrians, until thou have consumed them.

(1 kings 22:11)

And thou shalt make the horns of it upon the four corners thereof: his HORNS shall be of the same: and thou shalt overlay it with brass. (Exodus 27:2)

The list goes on! This only shows that the actual english translation was hidden by the copyist. The golden question is why did he have HORNS coming out? No wonder it says Aaron and the children of Israel were afraid to come close to him? 

Again why did the copyist hide this?

 

According to Matthew, Jesus accused the Jewish leaders of murdering Zechariah son of Barachiah:

"...Zechariah son of Barachiah whom you murdered between the sanctuary and the altar." (Matthew23:35).

-----------------

Unfortunately, the Zachariah mentioned was slain in Jerusalem, 69 CE; so that Matthew makes Jesus refer to an event that occurred 39 years after his death in the past tense.

Referring to this passage, the Catholic scholar Dr. Hug says: "There cannot be a doubt, if we attend to the name, the fact and its circumstances, and the object of Jesus in citing it, that it was the same Zacharias Barouchos, who, according to Josephus, a short time before the destruction of Jerusalem, was unjustly slain in the temple."

Commenting on this passage, Prof. Newman says: "There is no other man known in history to whom the verse can allude. If so, it shows how late, how ignorant, how rash is the composer of a text passed off on us as sacred truth" (Religion not History, p. 46).

Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges Commentary 

35. from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias] If the reading “son of Barachias” be retained (it is omitted in the Sinaitic MS.) a difficulty arises; for the Zacharias, whose death “in the court of the house of the Lord” is recorded 2 Chronicles 24:20-22, was the son of Jehoiada. The words, however, do not occur in Luke 11:51, and are possibly interpolated. Zechariah the prophet

Shockingly biblical scholars admit there is an INTERPOLATION !!!!!!!!!!

What a Shame!!!

Missionary lie exposed!

It's been a few times now I've come across on Facebook this new missionary lie which totally takes the biscuit. It's about a small child one version says boy another says girl who apparently asked an Imam a question with baffled him and he was unable to answer!. So what was this question posed by a child which the imam was shocked and unable to answer?

Believe it or not  the child asked the Imam after his Islamic lecture, where does the Quran say Allah love the sinner like her? Which apparently made the imam speechless?

Ask yourself this question have you ever heard of a small child going up to an imam and asking such a question!!! Seriously? And what's worse it had to be a Christian making mention of such an apparent situation. It seems to me that Christians have become to desperate they'll go to any means to make Islam look bad even if it's the road to lying!. 

Let's say for arguments sake this child even asked the Imam was the imam able to answer this child's  question? And the answer is YES let's clear this lie made by Christians and close this case for good.

Now unlike Christians who only accept and rely upon the bible (sets of books from the old and new testament making it into one), us Muslims on the other hand follow the Quran and Sunna (Teaching and sayings of Prophet Muhammed Pbuh found in books of Hadiths). Even the Jews have an oral tradition which they call inspired(Mishna/Talmud) but the Christians only solely follow the bible without any additional oral traditions. Let's use both Quran and sunnah I.e Hadith to clear up the lies the missionaries have created.

------------------

Say: "O my Servants who have transgressed against their souls! Despair not of the Mercy of Allah. for Allah forgives all sins: for He is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.

( Surah 39:53)

We read from the above verse that Allah Swt is speaking to his servants who have transgressed and sinned against their souls, sinned to the extreme beyond a limit who have done wrong Despair not the Mercy of Allah Swt as Allah Swt forgives All Sins.

Now imagine a disbeliever wether Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Atheist anyone who has constantly sinned and sinned Allah the Merciful will Forgive him providing he Repents why? Because Allah Swt Loves this person as the next verses will show

"But ask forgiveness of your Lord, and turn unto Him (in repentance): For my Lord is indeed full of mercy and loving-kindness." (Surah 11:90)

And He is the Oft-Forgiving, Full of Loving-Kindness,(Surah 85:14)

The above verses clearly reads Allah Swt is the Loving, We read in Surah 39:53 that No Matter how much you have sinned against your own soul despair not the Mercy of Allah Swt as he will forgive you why because he is the loving the kind as found in Surah  11:90 and Surah  85:14

There we have it Allah Swt loves everyone wether your a sinner or not a Jew, Christian, buddist, Hindu, atheist it does not matter as he's giving you a chance to free yourself from all the bad deeds you have committed no matter how much they may be it could reach the sky do not worry  by the Mercy of Allah Swt he will forgive you providing you repent as Allah Swt is the Loving and he Loves to Forgive Us.

Now let's read from Hadith 

In Saheeh Muslim it is narrated from Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “Allah has one hundred parts of mercy, of which He sent down one between the jinn, mankind, the animals and the insects, by means of which they are compassionate and merciful to one another, and by means of which wild animals are kind to their offspring. And Allah has kept back ninety-nine parts of mercy with which to be merciful to His slaves of the Day of Resurrection.” (Muslim, al-Tawbah, 6908) 

It was narrated that ‘Umar ibn al-Khattab (may Allah be pleased with him) said: “Some prisoners were brought to the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), and there was a woman among the prisoners who was searching (for her child). When she found her child she embraced him and put him to her breast. The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said to us, ‘Do you think that this woman would throw her child in the fire?’ We said, ‘No, by Allah, not if she is able not to.’ The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, ‘Allah is more merciful to His slaves than this woman is to her child.’”  (Agreed upon)

Volume 9 / Book 93 / Hadith Number 577

Narrated by Abu Huraira

Allah's Apostle said, "If Allah loves a person, He calls Gabriel, saying, 'Allah loves so and so, O Gabriel love him' So Gabriel would love him and then would make an announcement in the Heavens: 'Allah has loved so and-so therefore you should love him also.' So all the dwellers of the Heavens would love him, and then he is granted the pleasure of the people on the earth." (See Hadith No. 66, Vol. 8) 

We can conclude that Allah Swt is the most Loving and Kind and Allah Swt Loves his creations and is The  Most Mercy Merciful to his Creation. Wether your a Jew, Christian, Hindu, buddist, Atheist Despair Not you will be forgiven providing you repent as Allah Swt is the most Merciful and Loving.

Wives of solomon had more power then yahweh (biblical God)

At Gibeon the LORD appeared to Solomon during the night in a dream, and God said, "Ask for whatever you want me to give you." (1 kings 3:5)

Give me an understanding heart so that I can govern your people well and know the difference between right and wrong. For who by himself is able to govern this great people of yours?" (1 kings 3:9)

I will do what you have asked. I will give you a wise and discerning heart, so that there will never have been anyone like you, nor will there ever be. (1 king 3 :12)

And God gave Solomon wisdom and understanding exceeding much, and largeness of heart, even as the sand that is on the sea shore. (1 kings 4:29)

King Solomon was greater in riches and wisdom than all the other kings of the earth. (1 Kings 10:23)

--------------------------------

From the Above verses it seems like solomon is a great king and yahweh has blessed him with all Wisdom, riches, discerning Heart, one who knows RIGHT FROM WRONG!!.. The Prefect man as the King on earth, imagine people of the world came to get his wisdom?. Surely if YAHWEH has blessed him from himself then this blessing will always remain in him.  After all Yahweh came to his dreams and asked him what he wants, It's not often yahweh comes in dreams.?

However Yahweh didn't even know what was coming to him. It's seems  like ya he got tricked by the wives of solomon!. They say the older you get the wiser you become, not in this case solomon was supposed to have been given wisdom at a very young age.    

-------------------------------

As Solomon grew old, his wives turned his heart after other gods, and his heart was not fully devoted to the LORD his God, as the heart of David his father had been.

(1 kings 11:4)

So solomon became a pagan? His wives  turned his HEART AWAY FROM GOD?.. How is that even possible when Yahweh himself granted solomon with such qualities of wisdom? A man who was blessed by God went against it? Can you imagine a Prophet of God became a pagan How could this be? Which begs the question why jews and Christians will have books written by a pagan I.e songs of Solomon and proverbs?

Yahweh commands stones as part of gifts

The Sacred Tent

1 The Lord said to Moses:

2 Tell everyone in Israel who wants to give gifts that they must bring them to you. 

3 Here is a list of what you are to collect: Gold, silver, and bronze; 

4 blue, purple, and red wool; fine linen; goat hair; 

5 tanned ram skins; fine leather; acacia wood; 

6 olive oil for the lamp; sweet-smelling spices to mix with the oil for dedicating the tent and ordaining the priests; 

7 and onyx stones for the sacred vest and the breastpiece. 

8 I also want them to build a special place where I can live among my people. 

9 Make it and its furnishings exactly like the pattern I will show you.

(Exodus 25:1-9)

-------------------

Take notice on verse 7 (and onyx stones for the sacred vest and the breastpiece.)

ONXY STONES!!!!

One wonders why Christians say Muslims worship black stone where in reality Muslims do not worship the black Stone. For us Muslims it's a Sacred Stone sent from heaven. And here we read from the very bible Christians cherish the ONXY stone must be used for the Sacred vest and breastpiece. Below we read Jacob using a rock to worship Yahweh?......

When Jacob got up early the next morning, he took the rock that he had used for a pillow and stood it up for a place of worship. Then he poured olive oil on the rock to dedicate it to God,

(Genesis 28:18 )

Sacrifice?

How can Jesus have sacrificed himself when God raised him back to life again? Let's examine this claim, Sacrificing something or someone only happens when you want something back in return? If God sacrificed himself what did he get in return when he already owns EVERYTHING? What could god possibly gain from sacrificing  himself when he Owns everything and do what he likes whenever he wants? What good will that do to him?

----------------

What does sacrifice mean?

sacrifice

ˈsakrɪfʌɪs/

noun

1. 1. 

   an act of slaughtering an animal or person or surrendering a possession as an offering to a deity.

   "they offer sacrifices to the spirits"

   synonyms:

   ritual slaughter, hecatomb, immolation, offering, oblation;  self-sacrifice, self-immolation "initiation ceremonies include the sacrifice of animals"

----------------

So God sacrificed himself to himself in order to forgive mankind from a sin which he created himself? And how can you say God sacrificed himself or his son whichever way you see it, when he brought himself or his son back to life again which means there was no sacrifice and nothing was lost ? It's like giving away your old car knowing you have a new one?

Thus Jesus could not have Sacrificed himself when he was brought back to life.. In reality Nothing was lost? So where's the sacrifice

The tradition of sacrifice is not that after a animal  is slaughtered it is raised back to life again, then the whole purpose of sacrifice is meaningless.

How can Jesus be a sacrifice when he was brought back to life again? Since when did the Jews sacrifice animals in the temple they took, saw them come back to life again? The entire sacrifice will have no meaning. A sacrifice is made to receive something in return so, your sacrifice is gone or given away not to return.

If Jesus came back to life after sacrificing himself that is according to Christians, than wheres the sacrifice if nothing is lost? So, in reality nothing was given up nor any sacrifice made.

That's whole point of giving a life i.e. animal for sacrifice. Christians claim God gave his son to redeem the sins of mankind as the perfect sacrifice, yet this son was brought life back so, how is it a sacrifice when the whole point is to give up this life?

Makes no sense Christians claiming a sacrifice was made.

---------------------

Leviticus 17:11 use on alter

Leviticus 1:2

Leviticus 5:11

Jonah 3:7-10 sins forgiven for Ninevites

Numbers 16:47  no blood needed

Numbers 31:50  no blood needed

Isaiah 6:6-7 sins purged.  Fire stops bleeding

Leviticus 4: 1-2 blood sacrifice done through unintentional sin no intentional.

Pre meditated sin wont for sins. Blood sacrifice is for accidental sin.

Numbers 15:30-31 sin on him

Numbers 5:6-7  sin on him and no blood sacrifice.  Confess the sin you have done.

Jeremiah 7:22-23 Yahweh said he never commanded blood sacrifice

Where does Yahweh say to do a blood sacrifice

Leviticus 1:1-2 the word used is "IF" not that yahweh commanded them to

Leviticus 4:32 sin offering lamb must be a female. Jesus was a male. Jesus of the bible was scorged and beaten so he wasn't blemish. Crown of thorns bleeds. Lamb doesn't know how to sin. Without blemish does not mean without  sin. Without blemish means no problem with your skin.

1 he was human

2 he was male not female

3 he was not blemish

Deuteronomy 12:30-31  following. Jews wanna follow the pagans after being saved. Human sacrifice is an abomination something he hates.

Jeremiah 19:4-6 human sacrifice was not commanded

------------

No sacrifice / statue

 

 

Put your burnt offerings unto your sacrifices, and eat flesh. For I spake not unto your fathers, nor commanded them in the day that I brought them out of the land of Egypt, concerning burnt offerings or sacrifices. Jeremiah 7:21-22

 

 

The showed gratitude by giving an offering not tat God asked them too. The command always starts with “If” you are to bring a offering, not that you must bring an offering.

 

 

No, God does not desire animal sacrifices.

The book of Psalms is the first book of the Bible to claim that God does not desire animal sacrifices.

Sacrifice and offering thou didst not desire. Psalm 40:6

 

Will I eat of the flesh of bulls, or drink the blood of goats? Psalm 50:13

 

For thou desirest not sacrifice ... thou delightest not in burnt offerings. Psalm 51:16

 

        Some prophets make the same claim.

 

I delight not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of he goats. Isaiah 1:11

 

He that killeth an ox is as if he slew a man. Isaiah 66:3

 

Your burnt offerings are not acceptable, nor your sacrifices sweet unto me. Jeremiah 6:20

 

Put your burnt offerings unto your sacrifices, and eat flesh. For I spake not unto your fathers, nor commanded them in the day that I brought them out of the land of Egypt, concerning burnt offerings or sacrifices. Jeremiah 7:21-22

 

For I desired mercy, and not sacrifice; and the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings. Hosea 6:6

 

Shall I come before him with burnt offerings, with calves of a year old? Will the LORD be pleased with thousands of rams? Micah 6:6-7

 

         And then Jesus says the same thing a couple of times (quoting Hosea).

I will have mercy, and not sacrifice. Matthew 9:13, 12:7

 

 

 

Child sacrifice was commanded of the Israelites by Yahweh, the biblical God.

You shall not delay to offer from the fulness of your harvest and from the outflow of your presses. The first-born of your sons you shall give to me. You shall do likewise with your oxen and with your sheep: seven days it shall be with its dam; on the eighth day you shall give it to me. (Exodus 22:29-30)

The context of this passage concerns offerings and sacrifices, and it says God requires firstborn sons to be literally sacrificed to him. Later on we find Yahweh admitting he commanded this to Ezekiel

Moreover I gave them statutes that were not good and ordinances by which they could not have life; and I defiled them through their very gifts in making them offer by fire all their first-born, that I might horrify them; I did it that they might know that I am the LORD (Yahweh). (Ezekiel 20:25-26)

Disturbing how Yahweh intentionally played with the Israelites to teach them a lesson, later admitting why did he did it.This again goes back to Ezekiel where Yahweh testifies he is a deceiver.

"If any prophets are DECEIVED into giving a false answer, it is because I, the LORD, have DECEIVED them... (Ezekiel 14:9)

In other words Yahweh deceived Moses the Prophet of the Jews and later tried to justify his deeds to what he did to his people. Interesting how Yahweh told Ezekiel of his evil scheme. could it be the later Jews were questioning child sacrifice to Yahweh?

 

also read Numbers 14:20 from context

Hosea 6 

Satan has an upper hand!

For God did not spare even the angels who sinned. He threw them into hell, in gloomy pits of darkness, where they are being held until the day of judgment. (2 peter 2:4)

------------------

Who are these Angels that sinned  that God didn't spare and threw them in Hell?

Here's the dilemma if God can throw Angels who sinned in hell, and leave them there till the day of judgement why is Satan still roaming on earth? Is Satan not an Angel according to the bible? Did Satan not sin when he disobeyed God and made Adam and Eve eat the forbidden fruit. What could be more worse then that. Why is Satan exempted from being thrown in hell like the rest of the Angels?

If it wasn't for Satan in the first place then those Angels would not have sinned by coming to earth and having sex with women's.. But how did those Angels sin when they married the women's they had sex with on earth?

When human beings began to increase in number on the earth and daughters were born to them, the sons of God saw that the daughters of humans were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose. (Genesis 6:1-2)

Not like the Angels committed fornication? They liked what they saw I.e the daughters of men's on earth and Married them had sexual intimacy with their wives so how is that a sin? It doesn't makes sense you getting punished for having sex with your wife, whilst  the real culprit that is Satan goes scoot free for not only disobeying God but causing man to astray using deception.

Seems like Yahweh has given Satan special privileges where he can even go stand in from of God himself incite him and walk away.  

Then the LORD said to Satan, "Have you considered my servant Job? There is no one on earth like him; he is blameless and upright, a man who fears God and shuns evil. And he still maintains his integrity, though you incited me against him to ruin him without any reason." (Job 2:3)

Notice from the above verse Yahweh admits SATAN INCITED HIM!!! Can you imagine Satan didnt even leave Yahweh alone. He temps jesus and incites yahweh and makes job suffer yet Yahweh does not throw him in hell like he did to the other Angels? Also this Satan is the God of this world!.

Satan, who is the god of this world, has blinded the minds of those who don't believe. (2 Corinthians 4:4)

How ironic this Satan who is Evil, Deceptive, Corrupted is labeled as the God of the earth. Yet in the other hand the Angels who Married the woman's on earth and had Sex Legally and Condemned and thrown into Hell?

You call this justice!!!!!!

 

The Book of Esther is not historical rather is a work of fiction!.

How absurd a book inspired by God does not mention his name even Once!

The Book of Esther is supposed to be an inspired book. Yet In the entire book of Esther there is no mention of God. Not only does it not mention God once, it never mentions prayer to God or thanksgiving for deliverance how comes? It is a completely and brutally materialistic story of murder and robbery. How did this ever have into our Bible? According to the Jewish encyclopaedia the book 

----------------

As to the historical value of the foregoing data, opinions differ. Comparatively few modern scholars of note consider the narrative of Esther to rest on an historical foundation. The most important names among the more recent defenders of the historicity of the book are perhaps Hävernick, Keil, Oppert, and Orelli. The vast majority of modern expositors have reached the conclusionthat the book is a piece of pure fiction, although some writers qualify their criticism by an attempt to treat it as a historical romance. The following are the chief arguments showing the impossibility of the story of Esther:

In view of all the evidence the authority of the Book of Esther as a historical record must be definitely rejected. Its position in the canon among the Hagiographa or "Ketubim" is the only thing which has induced Orthodox scholars to defend its historical character at all. Even the Jews of the first and second centuries of the common era questioned its right to be included among the canonical books of the Bible (compare Meg. 7a). The author makes no mention whatever of God, to whom, in all the other books of the Old Testament, the deliverance of Israel is ascribed. The only allusion in Esther to religion is the mention of fasting (iv. 16, ix. 31). All this agrees with the theory of a late origin for the book, as it is known, for example, from Ecclesiastes, that the religious spirit had degenerated even in Judea in the Greek period, to which Esther, like Daniel, in all probability belongs.

Esther could hardly have been written by a contemporary of the Persian empire, because (1) of the exaggerated way in which not only the splendor of the court, but all the events described, are treated (compare the twelve months spent by the maidens in adorning themselves for the king; the feasts of 187 days, etc., all of which point rather to the past than to a contemporary state of affairs); (2) the uncomplimentary details given about a great Persian king, who is mentioned by name, would not have appeared during his dynasty.

It is difficult to go so far as Grätz, who assignsEsther to an adherent of the Maccabean party in the reign of Antiochus Epiphanes. The vast difference in religious and moral tone between Esther and Daniel—the latter a true product of Antiochus' reign—seems to make such a theory impossible. Nor is the view of Jensen, followed by Nöldeke, more convincing to the unprejudiced mind. He endeavors to prove that the origin of the whole story lies in a Babylonian-Elamitic myth. He identifies Esther with the Babylonian goddess Ishtar (Aphrodite); Mordecai with Marduk, the tutelary deity of Babylon; and Haman with Hamman or Humman, the chief god of the Elamites, in whose capital, Susa, the scene is laid; while Vashti is also supposed to be an Elamite deity. Jensen considers that the Feast of Purim, which is the climax of the book, may have been adapted from a similar Babylonian festival by the Jews, who Hebraized the original Babylonian legend regarding the origin of the ceremonies. The great objection to such a theory is that no Babylonian festival corresponding with the full moon of the twelfth month is known.

The object of Esther is undoubtedly to give an explanation of and to exalt the Feast of Purim, of whose real origin little or nothing is known. 

can Christians prove the book of Esther was inspired by God and not Satan? Would Satan mention God's name no?

Double standards..........

Christians should swallow what Judaic commentators say.... Since you all love running to TAFSIR! ------------- And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon man, and he slept, and He took one of his sides, and He closed the flesh in its place.(Genesis 2:21) -------Rashis commentary.....and he slept, and He took: So that he should not see the piece of flesh from which she was created, lest she be repulsive to him (Sanhedrin 39)  so adam would of been disgusted to see his wife? Yet below we read this same man committed beastly with all animals ( how sick) The man said, "This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called 'woman,' for she was taken out of man." (Genesis 2:23) -------------------------------- Commentary from talmud  R. Eleazar further stated: What is meant by the Scriptural text, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh?13  This teaches that Adam had intercourse with every beast and animal but found no satisfaction until he cohabited with Eve. (Yebamoth 63a) (Adam had sexual intercourse with all the animals in the Garden of Eden.)

Guide To Missionary Tactics

This guide is intended to improve awareness about the tactics used by some groups and cults. The tactics of missionaries and missionary groups may vary, but there are some basic guidelines to keep in mind that will be helpful in dealing with them. 

HIDDEN AGENDA

Some missionaries attempt to develop a rapport with their subject without divulging their own religious affiliation or intention. As an example to make making them seem less "Christian" missionaries are coached by their superiors to avoid using words such as "Christ" or "savior" or "baptize".

If you are not sure about the religious identity of the stranger who begins talking to you about religion, ask him directly about his beliefs and agenda. Be suspicious of an indirect answer. Remember these people aren't interested in dialogue or trying to improve Anglo-Muslim links but are often in SECURE PAID EMPLOYMENT to Sell Christianity. 

CREATING DOUBT

When talking to a Muslim about religion, a missionary may attempt to elicit as many "I don't know" responses as possible, in order to establish his superiority in matters of religion. Don't allow yourself to be intimidated! 

Remember, the missionary has studied Islamic beliefs for the sole purpose to sell Christianity to Muslims. There heart are sealed and they are no longer interested in truth. Keep in mind that he is not speaking to you in order to exchange ideas, but rather to create as much doubt in your mind and lead you away from your faith. If you want to learn more about the Quran, do so from someone who doesn't have hidden motives. Therefore, feel free to simply end the conversation and walk away. 

Remember that many of these questions and associations they are trying to sell have been debunked many times by more learned Muslims. If they were interested in dialogue the would be speaking to respected elders and community leaders exploring common ground improving understanding and faith in the community, but all one sees are the often the same question again to unsuspecting victims. Ask yourself what do they hope to gain ? 

However, some of you may want to listen to their arguments and then learn the Muslim response, in order to be better prepared for future encounters. One must also remember that many missionaries intentionally go into Muslim areas in Britain so they train themselves and create the most seductive "Sales Pitch" they can manage. Once they have finished there training in salesmanship they will target unsuspecting Muslims (the lonely, vulnerable and weak) lacking in knowledge. 

The following pointers should give you a basic idea of what to look for. 

DECEPTION

The missionary may tell you that he (or a Christian friend or acquaintance) was once an Muslim, or that he had a solid Muslim education, a traditional Muslim family life, etc. This is almost always a lie, so don't let him fool you. The hidden message that he is attempting to convey is that he came to accept Christianity after knowing and overcoming all of the Muslim objections (Jesus being son of god, Bible being corrupted by man etc.), and therefore, why should you bother to check it out? 
He may drop certain Islamic phrases or talk about the details of his "traditional" Muslim upbringing, in order to lend more credence to his story. In fact, his "memory" is often the result of careful coaching. 
The missionary might tell you that he knows the Islamic objections to his arguments, and will then proceed to show how such objectives are ill-founded. Don't expect to hear the real Islamic response from such a source. 

GOOD, BAD OR UGLY

Don't be taken in by the "good cop - bad cop" routine. This routine involves a "bad cop" who threatens the subject, and a "good cop" who protects him from the "bad cop". The subject is so grateful to the "good cop", and so worried about losing the good-will of his protector, that he invariably shows his appreciation by telling the "good cop" what he wants to hear. In similar fashion, the "good" Christian talks about how much he loves and respects Muslims, while denouncing the "bad" Christians who hate and have persecuted Muslims. The naive and ones lacking in knowledge of Christian history and bigotry will feel grateful to the "good cop", and may automatically judge him to be a friend and reliable ally. Watch out for hidden motives behind such "friendship". 

WHO BELIEVES IN THE SON OF GOD?

At the outset, the missionary will talk about his belief that Jesus is the messiah. Many Muslims don't find out until later, often after they have joined a Christian friendship group, that their fundamental belief is that Jesus is god. Any talk about "the messiah" or "son of god" is merely a cover for that belief, basic to Christianity . However, since such a concept is repugnant in Islam, this most basic belief of Christianity is glossed over as much as possible when missionaries talk to Muslims. 

PROOF Or SPOOF?

Don't be impressed by the claim that Christians have 50, or 100, or 300 "proofs" that they are correct in their claims about Jesus. As proof after proof is shown to be meaningless, the missionary will hide behind his numbers, as if to say: "Well, we have so many more proofs, what's the difference if you can disprove some of them". He will attempt to "split the difference" with you: "Well, even if half our proofs prove nothing, we still have another 25 or 50, or 150". Remember, all of their proofs can be shown to be untenable. Keep in mind that a faulty point is not worth 50% of a good point, or 25%, or 10%. It is worthless. The simple mathematics are: 50 x 0 = 0, 100 x 0 = 0, 300 x 0 = 0. 

CIRCULAR REASONING

Very often, the reasoning used by Christian missionaries is circular. That is, the "proof" only points to something is if you believe it in the first place, and therefore is no proof at all. 

MISTRANSLATION

Be aware of the problem of mistranslating. A person who is not familiar with Arabic can be lead to accept a mistranslating which puts a Christian "twist" on a verse that never had such a meaning in the original. If you can't check it out yourself, talk to a reliable person who can. Remember, it is no coincidence that the Muslims of past generations, who were much better versed in the Arabic, never had any serious problems refuting Christian missionary arguments. 

In addition beware of Christian Translations of the Quran, many date from sixteenth to the eighteenth century with the sole intention of to discredit Islam. 

Please keep in mind ANY translation (interpretation) of the Quran will most definitely contain errors In its natural language (Arabic), the Quran is the direct Word of Allah (God) to mankind through the prophet Mohammed (peace be upon him). Any translation of the Quran no longer retains that 'official' and perfect status, however it can be tremendously helpful to beginning students wanting to learn more about Islam. 

We would strongly encourage those want to learn about Islam to purchase a copy of the Quran but with the following conditions: 

+ get one with commentary (tafseer)

+ make sure the tafseer is scholarly (e.g. references to reasons behind a verse, references to hadith and sunnah etc.) 

QUOTING OUT OF CONTEXT

Often a verse will be quoted to you that has been taken entirely out of context. When the entire chapter that contains that verse is read, it becomes clear that it does not corroborate the Missionary. 

Conclusion : Selling Timeshare or Christshare?
You may recognize many of the tactics used by some Missionaries in selling there faith as they have similarities to disreputable Timeshare and Double glazing salesman, and this raises some interesting points: 

Why would one propagate faith in such a deceitful and underhanded way, is it because: 

God will not aid ones seeking the true path? 

A bad product is difficult to sell unless you dupe someone? 

If you are genuinely interested in faith 

Why don't you go ask someone with a sound knowledge and understanding of Islam, instead of targeting the naive, vulnerable and the weak. 

Why do you seek out the naive and week and then intentionally ask Mischievous questions, when they have been answered many times by learned scholars and by people that you have approached over the years? Surely this does not add to knowledge or understanding. 

Why do you target Muslims 

Considering the moral depravity often in your own family and neighbourhood and within so called Christians. 

Is it because Muslims are wealthy in faith? 

Is it because you have so much hatred for us and you are unable, incapable or tired of other methods: 

RIDICULE

There is a very large number of publications by Muslims explaining Islam in plain and simple English. Look in any public library for books on Islam, a large proportion of them will be by orientalists and Christian missionaries, what do you think motivates someone to write a book on a subject one does not believe in and an area that has been already covered by numerous other books? Remember Christian "Translations" of the Quran whose sole intention was to discredit Islam. 

CRUSADES 

Butchered everyone including defenseless women and children or any one else that got in there way. Although it has taken many hundreds of years Crusaders have improved they now only kill some women and RAPE THE REST. The twentieth centuary has seen "Ethnic Cleansing" replace the word Crusade, in 1996 one of the youngest recorded victim of rape in Bosnia was a baby of 4 Months old. Many women and children had two of there fingers severed by the Serbs so that the three remaining fingers would remind them of the Trinity. 

A WAY FORWARD

While we as Muslims believe that the entire Quran is the word of God and we would like every one to accept it as such, God Himself has given the freedom of religion which we respect. With that in mind, all we hope is that non-Muslims will at least enlighten themselves with an open heart and mind by knowing what Islam is. We hope that Muslims, Christians and Jews will find ways to work together to bring peace on earth by eradicating immorality, fear, hate, disease, poverty and injustice. 

Muslims welcome the chance improve dialogue and understanding with all faiths. In addition we do not object to other groups explaining there ideas and faith to whomever expresses an interest, but we do think it is unacceptable that missionaries demean other faiths, use deceitful methods and harass communities with what can be described highly trained and focused door to door salesman. 

USE THE PROPER RESOURCES!

Most Muslims spend their time studying Islam trying to find a path to true enligtenment, and therefore may not be familiar with the "curve-ball" approach of missionaries. If you need advice concerning a problem of this sort, get in touch with people who are familiar with the tactics being used and who know how to deal with them.