Saturday 24 August 2024

Refuting The Allegation That ‘ Prophet Muhammed PBUH hit his wife Aisha RA’ and more!

 



Kaleef K. Karim

In this article, I am going to answer (refute) some claims that are spread around by some critics on women, in Islam.

Related Article:
Quran 4:34, ‘Beat Them’ (Wife Abuse)?

Critics of Islam who want to undermine the character of the Prophet Muhammed (p) have accused the Prophet of beating his wife Aisha up. The Hadith the critics cite says:

Muhammad b. Qais said (to the people): Should I not narrate to you (a hadith of the Holy Prophet) on my authority and on the authority of my mother? We thought that he meant the mother who had given him birth. He (Muhammad b. Qais) then reported that it was ‘A’isha who had narrated this: Should I not narrate to you about myself and about the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him)? We said: Yes. She said: When it was my turn for Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) to spend the night with me, he turned his side, put on his mantle and took off his shoes and placed them near his feet, and spread the corner of his shawl on his bed and then lay down till he thought that I had gone to sleep. He took hold of his mantle slowly and put on the shoes slowly, and opened the door and went out and then closed it lightly. I covered my head, put on my veil and tightened my waist wrapper, and then went out following his steps till he reached Baqi’. He stood there and he stood for a long time. He then lifted his hands three times, and then returned and I also returned. He hastened his steps and I also hastened my steps. He ran and I too ran. He came (to the house) and I also came (to the house). I, however, preceded him and I entered (the house), and as I lay down in the bed, he (the Holy Prophet) entered the (house), and said: Why is it, O ‘A’isha, that you are out of breath? I said: There is nothing. He said: Tell me or the Subtle and the Aware would inform me. I said: Messenger of Allah, may my father and mother be ransom for you, and then I told him (the whole story). He said: Was it the darkness (of your shadow) that I saw in front of me? I said: Yes. He struck me on the chest which caused me pain, and then said: Did you think that Allah and His Apostle would deal unjustly with you? She said: Whatsoever the people conceal, Allah will know it. He said: Gabriel came to me when you saw me. He called me and he concealed it from you. I responded to his call, but I too concealed it from you (for he did not come to you), as you were not fully dressed. I thought that you had gone to sleep, and I did not like to awaken you, fearing that you may be frightened. He (Gabriel) said: Your Lord has commanded you to go to the inhabitants of Baqi’ (to those lying in the graves) and beg pardon for them. I said: Messenger of Allah, how should I pray for them (How should I beg forgiveness for them)? He said: Say, Peace be upon the inhabitants of this city (graveyard) from among the Believers and the Muslims, and may Allah have mercy on those who have gone ahead of us, and those who come later on, and we shall, God willing, join you. (Sahih Muslim, Book 004, Number 2127)

The word that is used in above Hadith as “Struck” is false; the word in Arabic that is used is “Lahada.” Edward William Lane explains that the Arabic word “Lahada” means “pushed away” as you will see below:

lahada[1]

The hand imposition of the prophet Muhammed (pbuh) it is a gesture driving away evil influence (waswas) and conferring blessings, it’s nothing bad at all. The intent of the Prophet Muhammed (p) was to drive away ‘evil influence’ from Aisha. Proof from the following Hadiths that the prophet Muhammed (p) pushed Aisha (Ra) and never hit her:

Aisha said: Allaah’s Messenger (pbuh) never hit anything with his hand ever, except when fighting in the path of Allaah. Nor did he ever hit a servant or a woman.” [Recorded In Ibn Majah. Al-Albani graded it Sahih.]

Aisha reports: Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) did not hit Anything with his hands, besides the time when he made Jihaad in the Path of Allah. He did not hit a servant nor a woman (wife, girl etc.)”. [Shamaail‐e‐Tirmidhi (331) Hadith Number 6.]

‘Aisha (May Allah be pleased with her) reported: Messenger of Allah (pbuh) never hit anything with his hand neither a servant nor a woman but of course, he did fight in the Cause of Allah. He never took revenge upon anyone for the wrong done to him, but of course, he exacted retribution for the sake of Allah in case the Injunctions of Allah about unlawful acts were violated. [Muslim Arabic/English book reference : Book 1, Hadith 644]

As you have read from the above Hadith reported in three different Hadith Books , the prophet never hit any woman nor a servant, these statement(s) that the Prophet never hit any woman are from Aisha own mouth. So, the correct translation is that the Prophet pushed Aisha, to drive away evil influence, as Aisha makes it evidently clear that he NEVER hit any woman or servant. That statement from Aisha alone shows that Prophet Muhammed (p) was never abusive in any shape or form, to any of his wives. This proves that the translation for the Hadith that says Muhammed ‘struck’ Aisha is false.

Furthermore John Louis Esposito who is a professor of International Affairs and Islamic Studies at Georgetown University. Professor John L. Esposito is a Catholic Christian also cites the above hadith mentioned and makes it clear that nowhere in the Hadith or Quran is there any record of Muhammed (p) ever mistreating any of his wives, it does not exist. He writes:

“….the hadith (Prophetic traditions) note Muhammad’s respect for and protection of women. Muhammad said, ‘The best of you is he who is best to his wife.’ Muhammad’s wife Aisha narrated that Muhammad never hit any servant or woman and never physically struck anyone with his own hand. Neither the Quran nor the hadith record Muhammad as ever mistreating or losing temper with any of his wives, even when he was unhappy or dissatisfied.[2]

One last thing that needs to be clarified is the Arabic word “jihad”. jihad Means striving in the way of God. To forbid evil and do good. So if someone comes and attacks you, coming on your land and trying to kill you, you can defend yourself. Jihaad means striving to live a moral and virtuous life, spreading and defending Islam as well as fighting injustice and oppression.

Another Hadith which is frequently quoted by Critics that Prophet Muhammed (p) approved of wife abuse is:

Narrated Umar ibn al-Khattab: The Prophet said: A man will not be asked as to why he beat his wife.(Abu Dawud, Book 11, Number 2142)

This Hadith is narrated by Umar bin al khattab and it was mentioned in the following Hadiths books:
Abu Dawood number 2147, Al-Nasai 5/372, Ibn Majah num/1987 And Ahmed Ibn Hanbal in his Musnad (1/275) and all these books that is mentioned have the same chain of narrations. This chain which is narrated from Abu Dawud Bin Abdullah Aloudi from Abdurahman Al-Measly from Al-Ashath Ben qays from Umar Ibn Al-khattab.

This Hadith quoted is considered by majority of Scholars to be a ‘weak Hadith’:

Ibn hajar in his Book Tahtheeb Al Tahtheeb (6/394) narrating from Abi Al-fatah Al Azdi have counted this as one of the very weak Hadith and he says about it that it needs to be overlooked and checked. Most Hadith scholars judged this Hadith to be weak and to be returned and not be taken from it anything. Ibn Qatan in his book Bayan Al-Waham and Ibham (5/524) And also Imam Al Zahabi (Dhahabi) he said in his book that Abdurahman Al Measly is not known, so it is a weak Hadith, in his book Mezan Al Eatidal (2/602) and also Scholar Ahmed Shaker said the same, this chain is weak also Scholar Al Albani said the same thing, that this Hadith is weak in his book Erwaa Al Galiel (7/98) [3]

 

Scholar Hafiz Salahuddun Yusuf states that the is not only deemed “weak”, the text itself is rejected since it goes Islam core teachings in the Quran and Sunnah which emphasize kindness and being lenient:

“Commentary: This Hadith is also reported by Ibn Majah and Ahmad. Sheikh Al-Albani has classified THIS HADITH AS ‘WEAK‘ since its narration is not authenticated, therefore its CONTENTS ARE ALSO NOT VALID. Islam has NOT given the husbands absolute right over their wives and that they will not be questioned in the Hereafter or that they should not be questioned for their action and misbehaviour with the wives. On the contrary, ISLAM HAS STRESSED UPON THEM TO BE LENIENT AND TENDER IN RELATION WITH WIVES; AND THIS MEANS THAT THEY WILL BE TAKEN TO TASK FOR ANY WRONG AND INJUSTICE DONE BY THEM TO THEIR WIVES.” (Riyad-Us-Saliheen – Compiled by Al-Imam Abu Zakariya Yahya Bin Sharaf An-Nawawi Ad-Dimashqi [Darussalam – Commentary by Hafiz Salahuddun Yusuf], volume 2, page 28, online source http://kalamullah.com/Books/Riyad-us-Saliheen.pdf )

Islamic scholar, Shaykh Muhammed Nasir-ud-Din Al-Albani (1914 – 1999) comments on this weak report, he also rejects this story:

“… I said: THIS IS A WEAK CHAIN OF NARRATORS because among the narrators is Al-Musliyy (i.e. Abdurrahmaan Al-Musliyy who narrated this Hadeeth from Al-Asha’th ibn Qays on the authority of ‘Umar ibn Al-Khattaab from the Prophet (p).” Ath-Thahabi said: “He is not known except by this Hadeeth, and the only one who narrated from him was Daawood ibn ‘Abdullah Al-Awdi. The Haafidh [i.e. Ibn Hajar] said: “He is acceptable.” Note: Ath-Thahabi did not comment on this Hadeeth in his Mukhtasar, so Shaykh Ahmad Shaakir commented on this in his Commentary, and he said after attributing it to Musnad Ahmad, “ITS CHAIN OF NARRATORS IS WEAK, as the narration by Daawood ibn ‘Abdullah Al-Awdi is WEAK, so the fact that Al-Munthiri kept quiet about it (without criticizing it) is negligence on his part.” (Irwaa’ al-Ghaleel fi Takhreej Ahadeeth Manaar as-Sabeel, by Shaykh Muhammed Nasir-ud-Din Al-Albani, volume 7, page 99)

A Hadith being ‘weak’ means that the Prophet could not have made the statement, in other words, the Hadith may have been fabricated at a latter date. Them words are not from the Prophet Muhammed (p). It is typical of Christian missionaries to paste Hadiths in their websites, even when a Hadith is said to be weak and not from the Prophet, they still paste it to lie and deceive masses that ‘this is what Islam teaches’, when that is not true in reality. As shown the supposed Hadith is graded as ‘weak’ by majority of scholars, furthermore you can go to this website below as well, page 98 and 99 where the Scholars speak about this Hadith in great detail showing it’s a weak hadith:

https://ia801600.us.archive.org/19/items/erwaa.www.booksjadid.blogspot.com/erwaa7.pdf


Third Hadith which is quoted by Critics

Narrated Aisha: Abu Bakr came to towards me and struck me violently with his fist and said, “You have detained the people because of your necklace.” But I remained motionless as if I was dead lest I should awake Allah’s Apostle although that hit was very painful. Volume 8, Book 82, Number 828: Sahih Bukhari 1:7:330, and Sahih Bukhari 6:60:132

Whoever translated the Hadiths above has translated it wrong. The word above is entailing that the Abu Bakr STRUCK Aisha. The word in Arabic that is used is “Lakazani”. I will now show what the correct translation is:

lakazani[4]

So as you see Abu bakr poked Aisha hard. She was never hit with his fist, let me explain:
If Abu Bakr, the father of Aisha really hit her, wouldn’t she at least fall on the floor from such a blow or even stumble? It doesn’t make any sense. A woman getting struck by a fully grown man (his father) and yet she still stands there? The fact that Aisha still stood there, not falling down from the assumed blow, proves that Aisha was not hit by her father’s fist, but poked hard by her father.Correct translation would be that Abu Bakr poked her hard.

Quranic verses and Hadith, the sayings of the Prophet Muhammed (p) on women

1. Narrated Abu Hurairah (r.a): Allah’s Messenger (pbuh) said: “The believers who show the most perfect Faith are those who have the best behaviour, and the best of you are those who are the best to their wives in behaviour” (Tirmidhi, The Book of Suckling, Chapter: The right of a woman over her husband)

2. “…Do not retain them (i.e., your wives) to harm them…(Quran, 2:231)”

3. “If a wife fears cruelty or desertion on her husband’s part, there is no blame on them if they arrange an amicable settlement between themselves; and such settlement is best; even though men’s souls are swayed by greed. But if ye do good and practise self-restraint, God is well-acquainted with all that ye do.(Quran, 4:128)

4. Narrated Mu’awiyah al-Qushayri: “I went to the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) and asked him: What do you say (command) about our wives? He replied: Give them food what you have for yourself, and clothe them by which you clothe yourself, and do not beat them, and do not revile them. (Abu-Dawud, Book 11, Marriage (Kitab Al-Nikah), Number 2139 recorded in Ibn Majah as well, and others. Verified to be Authentic by Al- Albani, As sahihah Number. 687).

5. Narrated Mu’awiyah ibn Haydah: “I said: Apostle of Allah, how should we approach our wives and how should we leave them? He replied: Approach your tilth when or how you will, give her (your wife) food when you take food, clothe when you clothe yourself, do not revile her face, and do not beat her. (Sunan Abu-Dawud, Book 11, Marriage (Kitab Al-Nikah), Number 2138)”

6. Abu Huraira (Allah be pleased with him) reported Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) as saying: “He who believes in Allah and the Hereafter, if he witnesses any matter he should talk in good terms about it or keep quiet. Act kindly towards woman, for woman is created from a rib, and the most crooked part of the rib is its top. If you attempt to straighten it, you will break it, and if you leave it, its crookedness will remain there. So act kindly towards women. (Muslim, The Book of Marriage (Kitab Al-Nikah), Book 8, Number 3468)”

7. Quran 4:19 “O ye who believe! Ye are forbidden to inherit women against their will. Nor should ye treat them with harshness, that ye may take away part of the dower [money given by the husband to the wife for the marriage contract] ye have given them, except where they have been guilty of open lewdness; on the contrary live with them on a footing of kindness and equity. If ye take a dislike to them it may be that ye dislike a thing, and God brings about through it a great deal of good.”

8. Quran 30:21 “And among God’s signs is this: He created for you mates from amongst yourselves (males as mates for females and vice versa) that you might find tranquillity and peace in them. And he has put love and kindness among you. Herein surely are signs for those who reflect.”

Commentary for the above passage by Tanwîr al-Miqbâs min Tafsîr Ibn ‘Abbâs:

(And of His signs) of the signs of His divine Oneness and power (is this: He created for you spouses) human beings like yourselves (from yourselves that ye might find rest in them) so that the husband may find rest in his wife, (and He ordained between you) husband and wife (love) love of the wife for her husband (and mercy) of the husband towards his wife; it is also said that this means: love of the young ones of the old ones and mercy from the older ones towards the young ones. (Lo, herein) in that which I have mentioned (indeed are portents) signs and lessons (for folk who reflect) upon what Allah created.[5]

9. Quran 24:26 “Women impure for men impure. And women of purity for men of purity. These are not affected by what people say. For them is forgiveness and an honorable provision.”

10. Narrated Abu Huraira: “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘The strong is not the one who overcomes the people by his strength, but the strong is the one who controls himself while in anger.” (Bukhari, Good Manners, Volume 8, Book 73, Number 135)

11. Narrated Abu Huraira: “A man said to the Prophet , ‘Advise me! ‘The Prophet said, ‘Do not become angry and furious.’ The man asked (the same) again and again, and the Prophet said in each case, ‘Do not become angry and furious.” (Bukhari, Good Manners, Volume 8, Book 73, Number 137)

12. Abu Huraira reported: “I heard Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: One is not strong because of one’s wrestling skillfully. They said: Allah’s Messenger, then who is strong? He said: He who controls his anger when he is in a fit of rage.” (Muslim, The Book of Virtue, Good Manners and Joining of the Ties of Relationship (Kitab Al-Birr was-Salat-I-wa’l-Adab Book 32, Number 6314)

13. The Prophet Muhammed (Pbuh) said during the farewell sermon: “O people, your wives have a certain right over you and you have certain rights over them. Treat them well and be kind to them for they are your partners and committed helpers”. (Tirmidhi)

14. Tafsir Ibn Kathir, chapter 68:
Imam Ahmad recorded that `A’ishah said, “The Messenger of Allah never struck a servant of his with his hand, nor did he ever hit a woman. He never hit anything with his hand, except for when he was fighting Jihad in the cause of Allah. And he was never given the option between two things except that the most beloved of the two to him was the easiest of them, as long as it did not involve sin. If it did involve sin, then he stayed farther away from sin than any of the people. He would not avenge himself concerning anything that was done to him, except if the limits of Allah were transgressed. Then, in that case he would avenge for the sake of Allah.”

15. Ghazzali’s Ihya Ulum-Id-Din:
“The most perfect of believers in faith are those who are the finest in manners and most gentle toward their wives.”[6]

16. May Allah grant wisdom, patience and temperament to all husbands and wives to honour this beautiful relationship. (Hadith Number 2140, Book of Marriage, Abu Dawud, Volume 2).

Conclusion:

I believe I have shown ample of evidences that the Prophet Muhammad (p) never hit any of his wives. The Hadith that somehow assumed that the Prophet (p) hit Aisha, was debunked by Aisha’s own statement(s) that, Muhammed (p) ‘never hit any woman nor servant’. [7] [8]

References:

[1] Edward William Lane’s Arabic-English Lexicon, Volume 7 page 204
[2] What Everyone Needs to Know about Islam: Second Edition [Copyright 2011] By John L. Esposito page 114 – 116
[3] http://www.islamqa.com/ar/ref/146600
[4] William Lane’s Arabic-English Lexicon Volume 7. Page 199
[5] http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1282&Itemid=124
[6] Ghazzali’s Ihya Ulum-Id-Din, Marriage section http://www.ghazali.org/works/marriage.htm
[7] Scholar Shaykh Muhammad Saalih al-Munajjid:
“The words of ‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her), “he gave me a painful shove in the chest” indicate that what the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) did WAS MERELY A SHOVE, i.e., he PUSHED HER OR POKED HER IN THE CHEST; THIS DOES NOT REACH THE LEVEL OF REAL HITTING THAT IS INTENDED TO CAUSE PAIN and to humiliate. In fact it is stated in LISAAN AL-‘ARAB (3/393) THAT ONE OF THE MEANINGS OF THE WORD LAHD (TRANSLATED HERE AS SHOVE) IS POKE. In TAAJ AL-‘AROOS (9/145) IT SAYS THAT ONE OF THE MEANINGS OF THE WORD LAHD IS TO APPLY PRESSURE. All of these meanings INDICATE THAT THE PROPHET (BLESSINGS AND PEACE OF ALLAH BE UPON HIM) DID NOT HIT HER in the sense meant by those who want to cast aspersions upon him; rather HE POKED HER OR PUSHED HER IN THE CHEST IN SUCH A WAY THAT SHE FELT PAIN, BUT IT WAS MILD AND UNINTENDED PAIN; rather the purpose behind it was to point out something and teach.” (Did the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) ever hit his wife ‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her)? by Shaykh Muhammad Saalih al-Munajjid, online source https://islamqa.info/en/164216)
This Hadith where the Prophet (p) poked Aisha is deemed by classical scholar An-Nawawi (1233 – 1277) as being “weak”:
“…considered to have a weak chain of transmission, was nonetheless recorded by Muslim.” (This narration was considered weak al-Nawawi, al-Nawawi, Sharh Sahih Muslim [Damascus – Dar al-Khayr, 1998] volume 7, page 36-37) (“I Wanted One Thing And God Wanted Another…”: The Dilemma of the Prophetic Example and the Qur’anic Injunction on Wife-Beating [The Journal of Religious Ethics – Blackwell Publishing Ltd on behalf of Journal of Religious Ethics, Inc – No. 3 (September 2011)] by Ayesha S. Chaudhry, volume 39, page 421)

Thursday 22 August 2024

Wife Beating?

 

Assalamu Alaikum

 

Does the Qur’an give a freedom pass for men to beat their wives? Apparently so, according to Christian. They make the claim Surah 4:34 makes it permissible  for men to beat their wives.


The question is, what does the Qur’an say? Note: this would be a short response nothing academic. Let us take a closer look and see if the claim made by Christians is true.


Men are in charge of women by [right of] what Allah has given one over the other and what they spend [for maintenance] from their wealth. So righteous women are devoutly obedient, guarding in [the husband's] absence what Allah would have them guard. But those [wives] from whom you fear arrogance – [first] advise them; [then if they persist], forsake them in bed; and [finally], strike them. But if they obey you [once more], seek no means against them. Indeed, Allah is ever Exalted and Grand.

(Surah 4:34)

 

Notice the verse starts by stating how men are the protectors and maintainers of women through their wealth and Allah Swt has given them the advantage of the other. Men must provide for them wives there is no compromises for that. In fact, we have an authentic hadith where if a man does not provide for his wife and children then his wife can take from his wealth without asking him.

 

Narrated `Aisha:

 

Hind bint `Utba said, "O Allah's Messenger ()! Abu Sufyan is a miser and he does not give me what is sufficient for me and my children. Can I take of his property without his knowledge?" The Prophet () said, "Take what is sufficient for you and your children, and the amount should be just and reasonable.

 

(Sahih al-Bukhari 5364)                              

Moving back to the verse in question. Righteous women are devoutly obedient, they guard their chastity in the absence from their husband i.e., they would not do something which is deemed impermissible. Note for the former part this segment is referring to the righteous women. Now we move to the women who is not being righteous.

 

If the man [husband] fears “ill conduct” from his wife then let him first advice/admonish her, forsake them in bed i.e., do not be intimate as one would sharing the same bed, and if the matter is not solved then let him strike them [wife] but if they obey you seek no means against them Indeed, Allah is ever Exalted and Grand.

 

The verse is clear on how a husband should act towards an ill conduct wife. Firstly, as a Sunni Muslim I follow both Qur’an and Sunnah. If I bring any explanation, it will be from the Qur’an and the teachings and saying of Prophet Muhammed Pbuh alongside what the Salaf have said as mentioned in the Qur’an.

 

O you who have believed, obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you. And if you disagree over anything, refer it to Allah and the Messenger, if you should believe in Allah and the Last Day. That is the best [way] and best in result. (Surah 4:59)

 

In order to understand this verse, we must acknowledge the Qur’an was revealed in Arabic language [Surah 12:2] not English hence, we must go back to the original language to get a better, concise, elaborate understanding.

 

The question remains, does the Qur’an sanction wife beating? How was this explained by our Beloved Prophet Muhammed Pbuh. What did he say regarding this verse? After all the Prophet Muhammed Pbuh is instructed to explain the Qur’an to us.

 

With clear signs and Books (We sent the Messengers). And We have also sent down unto you (O Muhammad SAW) the reminder and the advice (the Quran), that you may explain clearly to men what is sent down to them, and that they may give thought.[Quran 16:44]

 

And We have not sent down the Book (the Quran) to you (O Muhammad SAW), except that you may explain clearly unto them those things in which they differ, and (as) a guidance and a mercy for a folk who believe. [Quran 16:64]

 

Let us take a look at an authentic hadith where our Beloved Prophet Muhammed Pbuh Cleary explained his verse.

 

 

It was narrated that:

Sulaiman bin Amr bin Ahwas said: “My father told me that he was present at the Farewell Pilgrimage with the Messenger of Allah. He praised and glorified Allah, and reminded and exhorted (the people). Then he said: 'I enjoin good treatment of women, for they are prisoners with you, and you have no right to treat them otherwise, unless they commit clear indecency. If they do that, then forsake them in their beds and hit them, but without causing injury or leaving a mark. If they obey you, then do not seek means of annoyance against them. You have rights over your women and your women have rights over you. Your rights over your women are that they are not to allow anyone whom you dislike to tread on your bedding (furniture), nor allow anyone whom you dislike to enter your houses. And their right over you are that you should treat them kindly with regard to their clothing and food.' ”

 

حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ أَبِي شَيْبَةَ، حَدَّثَنَا الْحُسَيْنُ بْنُ عَلِيٍّ، عَنْ زَائِدَةَ، عَنْ شَبِيبِ بْنِ غَرْقَدَةَ الْبَارِقِيِّ، عَنْ سُلَيْمَانَ بْنِ عَمْرِو بْنِ الأَحْوَصِ، حَدَّثَنِي أَبِي أَنَّهُ، شَهِدَ حِجَّةَ الْوَدَاعِ مَعَ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ ـ صلى الله عليه وسلم ـ فَحَمِدَ اللَّهَ وَأَثْنَى عَلَيْهِ وَذَكَّرَ وَوَعَظَ ثُمَّ قَالَ ‏ "‏ اسْتَوْصُوا بِالنِّسَاءِ خَيْرًا فَإِنَّمَا هُنَّ عِنْدَكُمْ عَوَانٍ ‏.‏ لَيْسَ تَمْلِكُونَ مِنْهُنَّ شَيْئًا غَيْرَ ذَلِكَ إِلاَّ أَنْ يَأْتِينَ بِفَاحِشَةٍ مُبَيِّنَةٍ فَإِنْ فَعَلْنَ فَاهْجُرُوهُنَّ فِي الْمَضَاجِعِ وَاضْرِبُوهُنَّ ضَرْبًا غَيْرَ مُبَرِّحٍ فَإِنْ أَطَعْنَكُمْ فَلاَ تَبْغُوا عَلَيْهِنَّ سَبِيلاً إِنَّ لَكُمْ مِنْ نِسَائِكُمْ حَقًّا وَلِنِسَائِكُمْ عَلَيْكُمْ حَقًّا فَأَمَّا حَقُّكُمْ عَلَى نِسَائِكُمْ فَلاَ يُوطِئْنَ فُرُشَكُمْ مَنْ تَكْرَهُونَ وَلاَ يَأْذَنَّ فِي بُيُوتِكُمُ لِمَنْ تَكْرَهُونَ أَلاَ وَحَقُّهُنَّ عَلَيْكُمْ أَنْ تُحْسِنُوا إِلَيْهِنَّ فِي كِسْوَتِهِنَّ وَطَعَامِهِنَّ ‏"‏ ‏.‏

 

 

(Sunan Ibn Majah 1851)

 

You can clearly read from the hadith at what point is a man allowed to strike his wife and for what reason.

 

 Let us break this down   

 

* - 'I enjoin good treatment of women, for they are prisoners with you, and you have no right to treat them otherwise, unless they commit clear indecency.

 

* - You have rights over your women and your women have rights over you.

 

* -  Your rights over your women are that they are not to allow anyone whom you dislike to tread on your bedding (furniture)

 

* - nor allow anyone whom you dislike to enter your houses.

 

* - And their right over you are that you should treat them kindly with regard to their clothing and food.'

 

The explanation is given in the hadith on how to treat your wives. Point one good treatment are enjoyed of woman unless they commit clear indecency. The Arabic word here for indecency is فَاحِشَةٍ [Fahisha]. Indecency may not be the correct English rendition of the word فَاحِشَةٍ  

 

So, what does فَاحِشَةٍ [Fahisha] mean? Below is a screenshot from Hans Wehr 4th ed pp. 818

 



 

Fahsa = monstrosity, abomination, atrocity, vile deed, crime, adultery, fornication, whoredom.

 

Reading the hadith its clear that this would be speaking about a woman who is either committing adultery, fornication or whoredom, as the hadith continues by saying “they are not to allow anyone whom you dislike to tread on your bedding” nor allow anyone whom you dislike to enter your houses.

 

Now ask yourself would a righteous, devout woman bring a man to your bed when you’re not present? Rather a vile, disobedient woman would do such a hideous act. The hadith is specific on what type of woman this is implying to.  

 

Let us now go back to the Qur’an and use the same method to what the Arabic reads. The Arabic word used for “ill conduct” is  نُشُوزَ [Nushuz]

So, what does نُشُوزَ [Nushuz] mean? Below is a screenshot from Hans Wehr 4th ed pp. 1133

 



 

Nushuz = animosity, hostility, antipathy, dissonance, discord, violation of martial duties on part of either husband or wife.

 

Using both Qur’an and Hadith we get the full picture. This verse is speaking specifically of a disobedient, malevolence, spiteful, ill conduct, vile, promiscuous fornicator who brings men to the house without the knowledge of her husband playing whoredom.  

 

Now coming to the word “strike them” Arabic word used is وَاضْرِبُوهُنَّ [Wadribuhunna]. Does it mean beat them harshly? Well, a similar word is found in Surah 38 where Ayub As is instructed how to fulfil his oath by striking his wife using a hand full of grass.

 

[We said], "And take in your hand a bunch [of grass] and strike with it and do not break your oath." Indeed, We found him patient, an excellent servant. Indeed, he was one repeatedly turning back [to Allah]. (Surah 38:44)

 

Ask yourself how much damage can you cause using a hand full of grass to discipline your wife?

 

Note Surah 4:34 is referring to isolated situation  which if it ever did occur then steps have been given on how to deal with it. Even after such discovery is made the husband must still maintain a cordial manner when disciplining his wife. He can not hit her on the face nor bruise her

 

"Fear Allah concerning women! Verily you have taken them on the security of Allah, and intercourse with them has been made lawful unto you by words of Allah. You too have right over them, and that they should not allow anyone to sit on your bed whom you do not like. But if they do that, (in that case) chastise them in a way that leaves no mark (i.e. not severe). Their rights upon you are that you should provide them with food and clothing in a fitting manner."

(Sahih Muslim, Hadith 2137)

 

It was narrated from Hakim bin Muawiyah, from his father, that:

a man asked the Prophet(): “What are the right of the woman over her husband?” He said: “That he should feed her as he feeds himself and clothe her as he clothes himself; he should not strike her on the face nor disfigure her, and he should not abandon her except in the house (as a form of discipline).” (Hassan)

 (Sunan Ibn Majah 1850)

 

In fact, the are many ahadith which encourage the husband not to beat his wives.

 

Bahz bin Hakim reported on the authority of his father from his grandfather (Mu'awiyah ibn Haydah) as saying:

 

I said: Messenger of Allah, how should we approach our wives and how should we leave them? He replied: Approach your tilth when or how you will, give her (your wife) food when you take food, clothe when you clothe yourself, do not revile her face, and do not beat her. Abu Dawud said: The version of Shu'bah has: That you give her food when you have food yourself, and that you clothe her when you clothe yourself.

 

(Sunan Abi Dawud 2143)


 

Narrated Abu Huraira:

 

Allah 's Apostle said, "Treat women nicely, for a women is created from a rib, and the most curved portion of the rib is its upper portion, so, if you should try to straighten it, it will break, but if you leave it as it is, it will remain crooked. So treat women nicely."

 

(Sahih al-Bukhari 3331)

 

It was narrated from Ibn 'Abbas that:

 

the Prophet said: "The best of you is the one who is best to his wife, and I am the best of you to my wives."

 

 (Sunan Ibn Majah Vol. 3, Book 9, Hadith 1977)

 

Conclusion:

Surah 4:34 is not sanctioning the beating of wives rather during an isolated situation where the wife indulges in a vile, hideous act where she turns to whoredom action is taken.

Thursday 15 August 2024

Who are the People of the Gospel?

 

 Assalamu Alaikum

 

A typical gloss reading of a specific verse from the Qur’an by Christians is becoming a social media trend. Christians depict the character Jekyll and Hyde from a famous novel. Jekyll suffered from a multiple personality disorder just like Christians do.

 

What do I mean by this? One instance Christians claim the Qur’an is not the word of God and another instance they say the Qur’an is confirming the bible? What kind of nonsense is this?

 

So which verse are they playing Jekyll and Hyde with, let us take a read.

 

And let the People of the Gospel judge by what Allah has revealed therein. And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed – then it is those who are the defiantly disobedient. [Surah 5:47]

 

Christians boldly claim Surah 5:47 is speaking about them hence, somehow their understanding is, according to this verse they must follow the Gospel which they apparently have i.e., the New Testament.

WONDERFUL EXPLANATION NOT!

 

Another speciality Christians have is, CHERRY PICK! And what is cherry pick? Selecting the best text which suits their needs without any context. Unlike Christians, Muslims read the entire context and refer to the scholars of the Qur’an to get the best understanding.

 

Let us read the verse in question from context and understand what verse 47 of chapter 5 means.

 

Indeed, We sent down the Torah, in which was guidance and light. The prophets who submitted [to Allah] judged by it for the Jews, as did the rabbis and scholars by that with which they were entrusted of the Scripture of Allah, and they were witnesses thereto. So do not fear the people but fear Me, and do not exchange My verses for a small price [i.e., worldly gain]. And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed – then it is those who are the disbelievers. [V 44]

 

And We ordained for them therein a life for a life, an eye for an eye, a nose for a nose, an ear for an ear, a tooth for a tooth, and for wounds is legal retribution. But whoever gives [up his right as] charity, it is an expiation for him. And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed – then it is those who are the wrongdoers [i.e., the unjust]. [V 45]

 

Verses 44-45 is speaking about the Torah which was given to Moses and those who followed him and who succeeded after i.e., the Jews, Rabbis, scholars were commanded to judge by what Allah Swt revealed therein. This would include the legal ruling and injunctions and those who do not judge by what Allah Swt has revealed are the wrong doers.

 

So far by context verses 44-45 is regarding the revelation given to Moses Pbuh and his followers. Key word here is followers keep a note of that. Let us continue reading the following verses.

 

And We sent, following in their footsteps, Jesus, the son of Mary, confirming that which came before him in the Torah; and We gave him the Gospel, in which was guidance and light and confirming that which preceded it of the Torah as guidance and instruction for the righteous. [Surah 5:46]

 

Notice the subject has changed from Moses Pbuh to Isa As Here, Isa As came after a succession of Prophets Pbut confirming what was revealed to Moses Pbuh alongside another revelation known as the Injeel [Gospel].

 

 

Now before we move to the verse in question there is another verse which complements Surah 5:46. Let us take a read.

 

And [make him] a messenger to the Children of Israel, [who will say], 'Indeed I have come to you with a sign from your Lord in that I design for you from clay [that which is] like the form of a bird, then I breathe into it and it becomes a bird by permission of Allah. And I cure the blind [from birth] and the leper, and I give life to the dead – by permission of Allah. And I inform you of what you eat and what you store in your houses. Indeed in that is a sign for you, if you are believers.

 

And [I have come] confirming what was before me of the Torah and to make lawful for you some of what was forbidden to you. And I have come to you with a sign from your Lord, so fear Allah and obey me. [Surah 3:49-50]

 

As you can see not only was Isa As sent to the Children of Israel, he performed many miracles by the permission of Allah Swt as proof and sign to those people who were around him. Interestingly the chapter also informs us what we read in Surah 5:46 i.e., he came with the Torah and Injeel, alongside additional information. He came to inform them regarding lawful and unlawful matter i.e., legal injunctions and they should fear Allah Swt and obey him.

 

Keep that in mind and let us now move to the verse in question.

 

And let the People of the Gospel judge by what Allah has revealed therein. And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed – then it is those who are the defiantly disobedient. [Surah 5:47]

 

This is where the Christians start flapping their broken wings assuming the verse is speaking about them. Remember context matters. We have already established the verses 44-45 is speaking of Moses Pbuh and his followers then the subject changes to Isa As in verse 46 continuing to verse 47 which is now referring to the followers of the Injeel [Gospel] for the time of Isa As, just like the Torah was for the followers of Moses Pbuh. The question is, how do we know is this the case?  Arabic grammar.

 

 Verse 47 reads وَلْيَحْكُمْ أَهْلُ ٱلْإِنجِيلِ And let the People of the Gospel”. The verse starts with the key word “AND”

 

Waw (و) – Also known as the “joining waw,” it is used to connect similar or related ideas. For example, طالبٌ و مُعَلِّم (student and teacher).

 

And is a conjunction to connect words in the same part of the speech. The waw indicates that what comes after it shares with the previous one meaning and indicate more than the partnership in the general meaning and indicate a chronological order between the sympathizers at the time of the occurrence of the meaning or on accompaniment, comment, or time limit, except by presumption.

 

Examples from the Quran :

 

One meaning:

 

and the earth and mountains will be lifted up and crushed with one blow

وَحُمِلَتِ ٱلْأَرْضُ وَٱلْجِبَالُ فَدُكَّتَا دَكَّةًۭ وَٰحِدَةًۭ  [69:14]

 

The conjunctions (Waw) here indicate that both the earth and the mountains share the same meaning, which is that they carry the Day of Resurrection, so they will be one bench.

 

Associated and accompanying.

 

But We delivered him and those in the Ark, making it a sign for all people. فَأَنجَيْنَـٰهُ وَأَصْحَـٰبَ ٱلسَّفِينَةِ وَجَعَلْنَـٰهَآ ءَايَةًۭ لِّلْعَـٰلَمِينَ [29:15]

 

It is known that salvation happened to Noah and those with him at the same time, and this is the meaning of the accompaniment.

 

The order:

 

When the earth is shaken ˹in˺ its ultimate quaking

and when the earth throws out ˹all˺ its contents,

and humanity cries, “What is wrong with it?”

 

إِذَا زُلْزِلَتِ ٱلْأَرْضُ زِلْزَالَهَا

وَأَخْرَجَتِ ٱلْأَرْضُ أَثْقَالَهَا

وَقَالَ ٱلْإِنسَـٰنُ مَا لَهَا [99:1,2,3]

 

Also

 

And indeed, We sent Noah and Abraham. وَلَقَدْ أَرْسَلْنَا نُوحًۭا وَإِبْرَٰهِيمَ وَجَعَلْنَا [57:26]

In this verse, Abraham – who is late in time – to Noah, who is ahead of him. That is, one succeeded the other.

 

There are many more example that can be shown from the Qur’an where the word Waw (و)  “and”, conjunction is connected to the statement which is being addressed more importantly these correlative conjunctions part of grammar therefore, Surah 5:46 and 47 are both connected as one message.

 

Let us break this down.

 

V 44 – Moses Pbuh is given the Torah. His nation [people of his time] was to judge using the Torah

 

V 45 – Rulings and injunctions are mentioned which were part of the revealed Torah. Notice the word Waw (و)  “and” is used meaning this is connected to the previous verse.

V 46 – Isa As is the subject now he came to confirm the previous scripture and was given a new revelation Injeel [Gospel]

V 47 – Once again notice the word Waw (و)  “and” is used meaning this verse is connected to the previous one which means, that the PEOPLE OF THE GOSPEL وَلْيَحْكُمْ أَهْلُ ٱلْإِنجِيلِ will be referring to the time of Isa As not the modern-day Christians who are not the true followers of Isa As.

 

The followers of Isa As for his time were called PEOPLE OF THE GOSPEL. Christians now do not follow the Gospel of Isa As they follow the gospel of Mark, Matthew, Luke, John and Paul.


The irony about this is, Christian don’t believe the Injeel was revealed Isa As by Allah Swt how then do they consider themselves as THE PEOPLE OF THE INJEEL? Ask any Christian does he believe in the One and Only True Creator Allah Swt who revealed the Scriptures to all the People and watch them openly reject it. In fact, they don’t even consider Isa As from the Qur’an as the true Messiah why then would they think the verse is somehow applying to them? Remember Jekyll and Hyde syndrome that’s what they suffer from.

 

One moment they believe in the Qur’an next moment they don’t. Christians have embodied this crafty, deceptive approach towards Muslims which they themselves know is misleading. 

 

Tafsir of Al-Qurtubi also says this verse is speaking of the people of the time of Isa As 




Conclusion :

 

Surah 5:46-47 is speaking of the People of the Gospel who lived during the time of Isa As and after until the arrival of Prophet Muhammed Pbuh.

 

Once again big thanks to my dear brother Adnan my Ustad JazakhAllahu Khair.


Refuting The Allegation That ‘ Prophet Muhammed PBUH hit his wife Aisha RA’ and more!

  by   DISCOVER THE TRUTH  • DECEMBER 23, 2013 Kaleef K. Karim In this article, I am going to answer (refute) some claims that are spread ar...