Thus Jesus could not have Sacrificed himself when he was brought back to life.. In reality Nothing was lost? So where's the sacrifice
The
tradition of sacrifice is not that after a animal is slaughtered it is raised
back to life again, then the whole purpose of sacrifice is meaningless.
How can Jesus be a sacrifice when he was brought back to life again?
Since when did the Jews sacrifice animals in the temple they took, saw
them come back to life again? The entire sacrifice will have no
meaning. A sacrifice is made to receive something in return so, your
sacrifice is gone or given away not to return.
If Jesus came back
to life after sacrificing himself that is according to Christians, than
wheres the sacrifice if nothing is lost? So, in reality nothing was
given up nor any sacrifice made.
That's whole point of giving a
life i.e. animal for sacrifice. Christians claim God gave his son to
redeem the sins of mankind as the perfect sacrifice, yet this son was brought life back so, how is it a sacrifice when the whole point is to give
up this life?
Makes no sense Christians claiming a sacrifice was made.
---------------------
Leviticus 17:11 use
on alter
Leviticus 1:2
Leviticus 5:11
Jonah 3:7-10 sins
forgiven for Ninevites
Numbers 16:47 no blood needed
Numbers 31:50 no blood needed
Isaiah 6:6-7 sins
purged. Fire stops bleeding
Leviticus 4: 1-2
blood sacrifice done through unintentional sin no intentional.
Pre meditated sin
wont for sins. Blood sacrifice is for accidental sin.
Numbers 15:30-31 sin
on him
Numbers 5:6-7 sin on him and no blood sacrifice. Confess the sin you have done.
Jeremiah 7:22-23
Yahweh said he never commanded blood sacrifice
Where does Yahweh
say to do a blood sacrifice
Leviticus 1:1-2 the
word used is "IF" not that yahweh commanded them to
Leviticus 4:32 sin
offering lamb must be a female. Jesus was a male. Jesus of the bible was
scorged and beaten so he wasn't blemish. Crown of thorns bleeds. Lamb doesn't
know how to sin. Without blemish does not mean without sin. Without blemish means no problem with
your skin.
1 he was human
2 he was male not
female
3 he was not blemish
Deuteronomy
12:30-31 following. Jews wanna follow
the pagans after being saved. Human sacrifice is an abomination something he
hates.
Jeremiah 19:4-6
human sacrifice was not commanded
------------
No
sacrifice / statue
Put
your burnt offerings unto your sacrifices, and eat flesh. For I spake not unto
your fathers, nor commanded them in the day that I brought them out of the land
of Egypt, concerning burnt offerings or sacrifices. Jeremiah 7:21-22
The
showed gratitude by giving an offering not tat God asked them too. The command
always starts with “If” you are to bring a offering, not that you must bring an
offering.
No, God does not desire animal sacrifices.
The
book of Psalms is the first book of the Bible to claim that God does not desire
animal sacrifices.
Sacrifice
and offering thou didst not desire. Psalm 40:6
Will I
eat of the flesh of bulls, or drink the blood of goats? Psalm 50:13
For thou
desirest not sacrifice ... thou delightest not in burnt offerings. Psalm 51:16
Some
prophets make the same claim.
I delight
not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of he goats. Isaiah 1:11
He that
killeth an ox is as if he slew a man. Isaiah 66:3
Your
burnt offerings are not acceptable, nor your sacrifices sweet unto me. Jeremiah 6:20
Put your
burnt offerings unto your sacrifices, and eat flesh. For I spake not unto your
fathers, nor commanded them in the day that I brought them out of the land of
Egypt, concerning burnt offerings or sacrifices. Jeremiah 7:21-22
For I
desired mercy, and not sacrifice; and the knowledge of God more than burnt
offerings. Hosea 6:6
Shall I
come before him with burnt offerings, with calves of a year old? Will the LORD
be pleased with thousands of rams? Micah 6:6-7
And then Jesus says the same thing a
couple of times (quoting Hosea).
I will
have mercy, and not sacrifice. Matthew 9:13, 12:7
Child sacrifice was commanded of the Israelites by Yahweh,
the biblical God.
You shall not delay to offer from the fulness of your harvest
and from the outflow of your presses. The first-born of your sons you shall
give to me. You shall do likewise with your oxen and with your sheep: seven
days it shall be with its dam; on the eighth day you shall give it to me.
(Exodus 22:29-30)
The context of this passage concerns offerings and
sacrifices, and it says God requires firstborn sons to be literally sacrificed
to him. Later on we find Yahweh admitting he commanded this to Ezekiel
Moreover I gave them statutes that were not good and
ordinances by which they could not have life; and I defiled them through their
very gifts in making them offer by fire all their first-born, that I might
horrify them; I did it that they might know that I am the LORD (Yahweh).
(Ezekiel 20:25-26)
Disturbing how Yahweh intentionally played with the Israelites
to teach them a lesson, later admitting why did he did it.This again goes back
to Ezekiel where Yahweh testifies he is a deceiver.
"If any prophets are DECEIVED into giving a false
answer, it is because I, the LORD, have DECEIVED them... (Ezekiel 14:9)
In other words Yahweh deceived Moses the Prophet of the Jews
and later tried to justify his deeds to what he did to his people. Interesting
how Yahweh told Ezekiel of his evil scheme. could it be the later Jews were
questioning child sacrifice to Yahweh?
also read Numbers 14:20 from context
