__________________
it took over 3000 years for john to tells us that the serpant in the garden of eden was actually satan?
whats funny about this is Christians attack Muslims by saying, your Book came 600 years later. lets use the same criteria for their Book. nowhere in the entire Old Testament is Satan blamed for insinuating eve to eat the fruit, why did it take 3000 years for a greek unknown man to tell us satan was behind it.
why did the Old Testament miss out such crucial detail of all time. why couldnt the Torah simply just say Satan was the cause of mans fall, rather then using the serpant as its opponent?.
just for the record, if a Christian says "in Islam Satan was the cause of mans fall, so why cant john say it". the problem with this is the Old and New Testament both are in disagreement with each other on this matter. one says it was rhe serpant who made man eat the fruit, the other says it was satan? think of it like this if Satan was the cause according to the Torah, then why did Yahweh curse the Snake saying it would crawl on its belly eating dust (Genesis 3:15)? does Satan crawl on its belly?. the Torah is makes a clear it was a serpant and not satan. whereas the New Testament makes is clear Satan was the Cause not the serpant.
in Islam the story fits perfectly without any sort of twisted mix messages or ambiguity. Satan was the Cause of mans fall not a serpant.
though the Quran came around 3500 years after the Old Testament and 600 years after the New Testament, the Message is perfectly clear and free from distortion on who was the cause of mans fall. unlike the Old and New Testament.
so was is the Serpant or Satan? who insinuated to eat the Fruit?
here's the dilemma if you say the serpant was the cause, then the New Testament is wrong. and if you say Satan was the cause, then the Old Testament is wrong.
If Satan was the cause then this means he "Crawls on his Belly", which creates a bigger probelm.
take your pick
