Yahweh a Magnificent liar!

Yahweh the Magnificent Liar!!!!

__________________________

"Speak to the Israelites and say to them: 'When anyone among you brings an offering to the LORD, bring as your offering an animal from either the herd or the flock.

"'If the offering is a burnt offering from the herd, you are to offer a male without defect. You must present it at the entrance to the tent of meeting so that it will be acceptable to the LORD. (Leviticus 1:2-3)

-------------------

Interestingly this god whom Christians and Jews believe in also known as Yahweh is one SUPER LIAR, with all due respect... HOW CAN YOU TRUST A LYING god! Let's read the book of Jeremiah yes the same man who called YAHWEH A DECEIVER! And why shouldn't be he had good reason to call him that... Read below how this lying god Yahweh told Jeremiah that he never told the children of Israel to offer and burn offering or sacrifices:

For in the day that I brought them out of the land of Egypt, I did not speak to your fathers or command them concerning burnt offerings and sacrifices.

(Jeremiah 7:22)

-----------------------

Point 1

In Leviticus, chapters 1-7 After delivering the Jews from Egypt, God went into minute detail regarding sacrifices and burnt offerings. However in Jeremiah 7:22 God denied that he ever said anything about sacrifices or burnt offerings.

Point 2

If Jeremiah actually was aware of the Torah then he would have known that yahweh was lying to him? Did Jeremiah not know of the book of Leviticus maybe not since this very same book Jeremiah tells us the Torah was distorted.. So this could mean either Yahweh did mention what Leviticus states or did not mention of a sacrifice and burnt offering which was added later... Then of course we have the FAMOUS PASSAGE

“How do you say: “We are wise, and the Torah of the Lord is with us? when, in fact, the false pen of the scribes has made it into a lie?” (Jeremiah 8:8 )

What a shame Yahweh lied to his Prophet, deceiving the man once again we find the same Jeremiah.. Confessing Yahweh tricked him

O Lord, thou hast deceived me, and I was deceived.

(Jeremiah 20:7

Jesus is not God

One wonders how do Christians miss such blatant verses?

Private blessing?

If his loins have not blessed me, and if he were not warmed with the fleece of my sheep; 
(job 31:20)

------------------------

Loins have not blessed him? I.e the private parts of a man this is no doubt since we have several other references where loin is the private part of a man for example :

All the souls that came with Jacob into Egypt, which came out of his loins, besides Jacob's sons' wives, all the souls were threescore and six; (Genesis 46:26)

We can read from the above text all those souls who came with Jacob came out of his LOINS!

Commentary  

Barnes' Notes on the Bible

If his loins have not blessed me - This is a personification by which the part of the body that had been clothed by the benevolence of Job, is supposed to speak and render him thanks.

Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible

If his loins have not blessed me,.... Which were girded and covered with garments he gave him; which, as often as he put on and girded his loins with, put him in mind of his generous benefactor, and this put him upon sending up an ejaculatory wish to heaven, that all happiness and blessedness might attend him, who had so comfortably clothed him; 

-----------------

Let's get a little deeper with the word loins the Arabic word for loins found in the bible is Sulb صُلْبِهِ which no doubt means the male private... So the question is is Yahweh expecting the Penis Male private part Loins for praise him?

Did the The ark of the covenant hold the tables only ???

There was nothing in the ark except the two stone tablets that Moses had placed in it at Horeb, where the LORD made a covenant with the Israelites after they came out of Egypt. (1 kings 8:9)

----------------------

having a golden altar of incense and the ark of the covenant covered on all sides with gold, in which was a golden jar holding the manna, and Aaron's rod which budded, and the tables of the covenant; (Hebrews 9:4)

Old Testament tells us the Ark of the Covenent held the tablets only, whereas the New Testament tells us it also had jar full of manna and Aaron's rod?? The question is why would the book of kings miss out the rest of the contents and hebrews not?? 

Did it take 1500 years untill the Jews knew what other contents were inside the Ark? It had to be an unknown Author to tell us.

A serious error made by Luke !!!!

A serious error made by Luke 

the son of Joanan, the son of Rhesa, the son of Zerubbabel, the son of Shealtiel, the son of Neri, (Luke 3:27)

----------------------

The above genealogy found in Luke 3:27 has a serious error specifically where it says that Rhesa was the son of Zerubabbel. But Rhesa is an Aramaic word meaning 'Prince' and was Zerubabbel's title, not the name of his son. 

Now that's a Serious problem, this says a lot when Luke boasts that he has the best orderly account then anyone else?

------------------------

We have a similar problem below and yes you got it, this was also written by Luke!

Joseph, a Levite from Cyprus, whom the apostles called Barnabas (which means "son of encouragement"), (Acts 4:36)

In Acts 4:36 , Barnabas does not mean 'Son of Encouragement', but 'Son of Nebo' or 'Son of a prophet'. To quote Hanson in 'Acts' (Oxford University Press 1967, p 81), 'it is unlikely that anybody who knew Aramaic could have made this mistake'. Barnabas appears in a list in Acts 13:1, together with Manaen (Menahem), whose name is much closer to 'Son of Encouragement'. Presumably Luke misread his list. He certainly never asked Barnabas what his name meant.

This only shows that the gospels are very unreliable !!!

Are womens Weak bible says yes!

Weak!! 

Your TROOPS will be as WEAK and HELPLESS as WOMAN. The gates of your land will be opened wide to the enemy and set on fire and burned.

(Nahum 3:13)

-------------

Commentary....

Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible

Behold, thy people in the midst of thee are women,.... Or like women, weak and feeble, fearful and timorous; frightened at the first approach of the enemy; run away, and run up and down in the utmost consternation and distress, having neither skill nor courage to oppose them; 

Also The NIV hides the embarrassing misogyny by changing “women in your midst” to “weaklings”: “Look at your troops—they are all weaklings.”

Isaiah 19:16 — The NRSV correctly reads “On that day the Egyptians will be like women, and tremble with fear before the hand that the Lord of hosts raises against them.” The NIV eliminates the embarrassing misogynism as well as the polytheistic epithet of Yahweh: “ In that day the Egyptians will become weaklings. They will shudder with fear at the uplifted hand that the Lord Almighty raises against them.” (Note: this mistranslation was introduced with the TNIV. See this discussion of the passage at John Hobbins’s blog.)

He or She?

He or she?

A few years ago, several publications reported the discovery of a rare English Bible called The “She” Bible. This version of the Bible is called The “She” Bible because of a supposed error found in the translation of Ruth 3:15. 

------------------

The following is an excerpt of my study of Ruth 3:15 taken from my book:

That night, after Boaz finished eating, he came to the threshing floor and went to sleep. Ruth slept by his side. In the middle of the night, Boaz awoke and realized that Ruth was by his side. He told her to stay there with him until morning. In the morning, Boaz gave Ruth six measures of barley and then someone went back to the city.

(But, who went back to the city? It depends on what translation you read.)

The Revised Standard Version reads:

“And [Boaz] said, `Bring the mantle you are wearing and hold it out.’ So she held it, and he measured out six measures of barley, and laid it upon her; then she went into the city” (Ruth 3:15 RSV, emphasis mine).

The New Revised Standard Version reads:

“Then [Boaz] said, `Bring the cloak you are wearing and hold it out.’ So she held it, and he measured out six measures of barley, and put it on her back; then he went into the city” (Ruth 3:15 NRSV, emphasis mine).

The versions disagree on who went back to the city. The following versions agree with the Revised Standard Version and say that Ruth went back to the city:

They follow Conjecture !!!!

They follow conjecture !!!!

So when the crowd had gathered, Pilate asked them, “Which one do you want me to release to you: Jesus Barabbas, or Jesus who is called the Messiah?” 

(Matthew 27:17)

----------------

What's fascinating the criminal who was apparently released in exchange of Jesus, was called JESUS BARABBAS 

Read the NIV of Matthew 27:17 which the KJV has been hiding for centuries... 

BARABBAS   = SON OF FATHER

Which means the jesus who is called the son of the father was released 

And Jesus was also the son of the father who was punished ??

----------------------------------------------------------------------

There are also several historical sources other than the Bible and the Qur’an which confirm that many of the early Christians did not believe that Jesus died on the cross…The Cerinthians and later the Basilidians, for example, who were among the first of the early Christian communities, denied that Jesus was crucified…The Carpocratians, another early Christian sect, believed that it was not Jesus who was crucified, but another in his place… [2. ‘Ata’ur-Rahim M, Thomson A. Jesus, Prophet of Islam. London. Ta-Ha, 1996 (revised edition). p47.]

So who was released the evidence is clear.......

According to Paul Jesus isn't the only man who went to heaven!

According to Paul Jesus isn't the only man who went to heaven!

Below we find TWO passages from the New Testament where john seems to lie to this readers by claiming Jesus was the only man who has ever gone into heaven and came back from heaven?

-----------------------------------

No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven the Son of Man.
(John 3:13)

This is where Paul completely destroys johns concept of this heavenly figure Jesus 

I know a man in Christ who fourteen years ago was caught up to the third heaven. Whether it was in the body or out of the body I do not know—God knows. And I know that this man—whether in the body or apart from the body I do not know, but God knows— was caught up to paradise and heard inexpressible things, things that no one is permitted to tell. (2 Corinthians 12:2-4)

-------------------------------

Poor john, if only he read the epistles of Paul he wouldn't of embarrassed himself, some unknown guy goes to heaven simple as that lol. this is another reason to believe John was unaware of Paul's writing  though Paul wrote much earlier then john. The two never had any link with each other..

This also bring to mind, the robber who Jesus promised will be in heaven with him?? Isn't he in heaven now... So this statement of no man has EVER GONE TO HEAVEN IS A LIE... 

just for the records Elijah  and Enoch according to the OT went to heaven much before the so called saviour of Christians did!  (2 kings 2:11) (Genesis 5:24)

How can Jesus be from the descendent of David if he had no father?

How can Jesus be from the descendent of David if he had no father?

Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh; (Romans 1:3 )

Here we read Jesus was the direct descendant of David how's that possible if he had no father??

The Greek text literally means sperm seed (oσπέρματος spermatos)

____________________________________________________________

Further we read he was referred as the son of David?

This is the genealogy of Jesus the Messiah the son of David, the son of Abraham:

(Matthew 1:1)

He called out, "Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on me!"

(Luke 18:38)

We know through medical science male and female carry chromosome which contains hundreds to thousands of genes. Females carry X chromosome and males carry Y chromosome.

For example, when Y chromosome is released from the male and meets the X chromosome then the child born will be a male, and if the X chromosome is released from the male the only other chromosome it will meet is X because the female doesn't carry Y thus, the child will be born as a female.

How could Jesus be the descendent of David if there was no DNA passed? The Y chromosome is only passed on through a male hence, it is impossible for Jesus to be connected as a descended of David as there is no links.

-------------------

This only concludes the Jesus you all portray was not born from a Virgin?? And even worse Mary whom they call virgin after having Jesus has more childrens from her spouse josepth, So why call her Virgin??

Isn't this the carpenter? Isn't this Mary's son and the brother of James, Joseph, Judas and Simon? Aren't his sisters here with us?" And they took offense at him.

(Mark 6:3)

The word messiah is not found in the Torah ?

The word Messiah is not found in the Torah ?

Imagine the 5 books known as the pentateuch which according to Jews and Christians Moses (Pbuh) wrote himself? Which contains 613 laws that are unbreakable, which Jews believe as the direct word from God to Prophet Moses (Pbuh) the very core of faith through believing the Torah as the book for Israelites :

This very Important book which is cherished by millions of Jews, this big encyclopaedia for Judaism DOES NOT CONTAIN THE WORD MESSIAH!!

--------------

According to rabbis Asher Meza he said in one of his debates with a Christian zadoc Ben isreal , if Jesus being the Messiah was so important why doesn't the Torah being the core in Jewish belief does not contain the word Messiah ? The Torah doesn't revolve around the Messiah!   

Now the question is when Jesus said Moses spoke everything about him does that also include Jesus being the Messiah?