Interesting, unlike a normal child, Jesus of the bible never called Mary mother, rather referred to her with the title "woman". Such disrespect towards ones own mother is despicable and uncalled for. The Old Testament is clear for such
abomination towards parents
"Honor
your father and your mother, so that you may live long in the land the LORD
your God is giving you. (Exodus 20:12)
Cursed is he
who dishonors his father or mother.' And let all the people say, 'Amen!' (Deuteronomy 27:16)
"'Each
of you must respect your mother and father, and you must observe my Sabbaths. I
am the LORD your God. (Leviticus 19:3)
Interestingly,
Jesus of the bible neither respected his mother or observed the sabbath
laws. Here’s the interesting part. Jesus
called his mother "woman" now the greek word used is γυνή
(goo-nay').
The word goo-nay normally refers to "wife or bride"
Strong's Exhaustive Concordance
wife, woman.
Probably from the base of ginomai; a
woman; specially, a wife -- wife, woman.
"It has
been said, 'Anyone who divorces his wife must give her a certificate of
divorce.' (Matthew 5:31)
The word
used for "wife" is γυνή (goo-nay').
When Joseph
woke up, he did what the angel of the Lord had commanded him and took Mary home
as his wife. (Matthew 1:24)
Joseph took
Mary as his "wife" γυνή (goo-nay').
Let's now go
to the accounts of Matthew and Luke narratives prior to the nativity by
just focusing on the specific verses which speak how Mary was CONCEIVED
The angel
answered, "The Holy Spirit will come on you, and the power of the Most
High will overshadow you. So the holy one to be born will be called the Son of
God. (Luke 1:35)
So what does
that means, let's ask Matthew:
This is how
the birth of Jesus the Messiah came about: His mother Mary was pledged to be
married to Joseph, but before they came together, she was found to be pregnant
through the Holy Spirit. (Matthew 1:18)
From the
above passages we can clearly read, that the Most High Overshadowed her (Mary),
and she became pregnant through the Holy Spirit.
HERE'S THE
PROBLEM
Christians
say Yahweh is God, Jesus is God, and the Holy Spirit is God. when we question
them on this absurdity, the explanation they give u is, there is three person
in one God, i.e. God has three parts. so Jesus is God in flesh, and the Holy
Spirit is part of God, there are not three God's but one.
For
arguments sake if one even agrees that, Jesus is God and the Holy Spirit is
also God, then this would indicate that Jesus being God, impregnated Mary. if
we take both Luke and Matthews account, and smash them together then it becomes
clearer that Jesus who after all is God and part of the Holy Spirit made Mary
pregnant.
as bad as it
may sound, either Christians have would have to accept this problematic narrative
or reject the trinity as a whole separating each being. Take notice Luke and
Matthew tells us god over shadowed Mary and she was found conceived by the Holy
Spirit.
Sound
like HOLY INCEST BEHAVIOUR! See how sick these people have
become. Let's see how they answer this dilemma, without turning to insults.
In short if
Jesus is God and Mary was overshadowed and conceived by God, then doesn't this
mean Jesus of the bible committed incest. He made his mother get pregnant
by him for him to be born. how absurd!
It would be
perfectly normal to call Mary "women" γυνή
(goo-nay'), wife, bride as he impregnated her, what a man would do to
his wife
Rather than going through such
absurdities by Christians, wouldn't it be more feasible that Jesus was
referring to Mary Magdalene and not Mary his mother. Think about it, Mary Magdalene
would follow him as a disciple. Mary Magdalene loved him to the point he went
to the "tomb" during darkness alone to take him, as found in the
gospel of John.
Calling Mary Magdalene woman γυνή (goo-nay') makes more sense than anyone else. Note, the New
Testament nowhere makes mention that Jesus was not married, nor betrothed at
any time. Bear in mind 30 years except for 2 day from the time of his birth and
couple of days in the temple at the age of 12 are missing. Christians have no
information on where and what Jesus was doing for those missing 30 years of his
life. Christians speculate, Jesus was the son of a carpenter so that’s what he
was doing, but this does not answer for 30 years of missing time. Jesus could
have been married and divorced there is no way to prove he wasn't.
We also know from the apocrypha
gospels such as the gospel of Thomas and
“The companion of the Savior is Mary Magdalene. But Christ loved her more
than all the disciples and used to kiss her often on her mouth" (gospel of
Philip)
Notice this writing; written
roughly 150AD stating Mary was loved and kissed by Jesus. Now Christians
dismiss such writing from the ancient text purely because they don't correlate
with the four canonised gospels which they have however, this does not disprove
the historical writings found elsewhere. Luke himself wrote, "Many
people have set out to write accounts about the events that have been fulfilled
among us" Luke 1:1.If have written their accounts of Jesus's life why is Luke
claiming to be correct? How can you prove those other writers were incorrect correct?
How can you prove those other writers were incorrect correct? This would also
question the other three gospels. If Luke as correct then by standards Mark,
Matthew and John where incorrect.
Moving to the New Testament.
Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not (SEXUALLY); for I am not
yet ascended to my Father:..... (John 20:17)
the Greek word used is " ἅπτου,haptou", meaning
:(of carnal intercourse with a women or cohabitation).
As we can read from the above verse Mary Magdalene wanted to
Touch him, let's focus on the word Touch in Greek which is (HAPTOMAI). Now this
may not seem troubling to an average Christian who read the bible in English or
in Greek. However, the problem starts when you unlock the Greek word (HAPTOMAI).
Let's break this down so we get a clear view of all this. It
seems like after seeing Jesus Mary Magdalene was so excited he went to touch
him (HAPTOMAI) and Jesus told her not to touch him (HAPTOMAI)
The word (HAPTOMAI) doesn't just mean touch The fact is, the
Greek word haptomai has a broad range of meanings and could imply such
connotation -- it means "to touch," "to lay hold on,"
"to embrace"; "to cling to," "to hurt," etc.,
(Greek-English Lexicon to the New Testament, by Dawson and Taylor), but not
necessarilry so. The word "haptomai" only takes on a
"sexual"implication when used in a sexual context, like is the case
in 1 Cor 7:1.
Thus, Mary Magdalene was the woman Jesus was married to and
he referred to her as γυνή (goo-nay'). So
Here’s
another controversy Christians must juggle with. Those Christians who bring up
"cross narrative" saying Jesus spoke to his mother and called her
woman and called John his disciple "son" to look after her.
Notice
the wordings, we'll established γυνή (goo-nay')
means wife and his would and could only refer to Mary Magdalene and how the
authors confused themselves with the many Mary's, such gross mistakes of
identities also falls at this very narrative. Jesus was speaking to Mary Magdalene
calling her woman γυνή (goo-nay')
and the "disciple" whom he loved would be his son. Note this loved
disciple has no name?
Christians
can play hermeneutics or in our case gymnastics with their bible text, but one
thing for sure they can't prove from their very "inspired" bible if
Jesus of the New Testament was married.
Let
the bible speak.