Paul was not inspired !!

Paul was not inspired !!

Even one of their own Prophets has said, "Cretans are always liars, evil brutes, lazy gluttons." This testimony is true. Therefore, rebuke them sharply, so that they will be sound in the faith and will pay no attention to Jewish myths or to the commands of those who reject the truth. (Titus 1:12-14)
-----------------

Who is this prophet Paul talking about? Let's find out via commentary and other sources 

Pulpit Commentary

Verse 12. - A prophet for even a prophet, A.V.; Cretan, s for the Cretinous, A.V.; idle gluttons for slow bellies, A.V. A prophet of their own; viz. Epimenides, a native either of Phaestus or of Cnossus in Crete, the original author of this line, which is also quoted by Callimachus. Epimenides is here called a prophet, not simply as a poet, but from his peculiar character as priest, bard, and seer.......

Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible

One of themselves, even a prophet of their own,.... This was Epimenides, in whose poems stand the words here cited; the apostle rightly calls him "one of themselves", since he was a Cretian by birth, of the city of Gnossus; 

Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary

12. One—Epimenides of Phæstus, or Gnossus, in Crete, about 600. He was sent for to purify Athens from its pollution occasioned by Cylon. He was regarded as a diviner and prophet. The words here are taken probably from his treatise "concerning oracles."........

Epimenides was a Cretan who said: "All Cretans are liars". In the books which deal with logic this statement is called Epimenides' Paradox. And quite surprisingly, you find in the book of Titus 
------------------------------

NOW THAT WE KNOW WHO THIS PROPHET IS LETS HIT PAUL WITH A SUCKER-PUNCH !!!!

One of the interesting things is that Paul quote the Epimenides' Paradox, specifying that the speaker himself was a Cretan. "Cretans are always liars..." he then says that the man himself spoke the truth. But when the statement is spoken by a Cretan it is definitely not true. If it was true then at least once, a Cretan was not a liar, in which case the statement is false. The conclusion is the denial of the assumption, so the statement is not true. The writer Paul at least on this occasion, was without Divine Guidance

IN SHORT PAUL QUOTED A CRETAN WHO HIMSELF SAID ALL CRETANS ARE LIARS, DOESNT THAT ALSO MAKE HIM A LIAR? YET PAUL SAID HE SPEAKS THE TRUTH HOW ABSURD!!! PAUL WAS NOT INSPIRED IN ANY WAY...

SHAME SHAME!!!!

Do Jewish Orthodox Rabbis lie? Bible says yes

The Guards’ Report another  made up lie!

While the women were on their way, some of the guards went into the city and reported to the chief priests everything that had happened. When the chief priests had met with the elders and devised a plan, they gave the soldiers a large sum of money, telling them, “You are to say, ‘His disciples came during the night and stole him away while we were asleep.’ If this report gets to the governor, we will satisfy him and keep you out of trouble.” So the soldiers took the money and did as they were instructed. And this story has been widely circulated among the Jews to this very day 

(Matthew 28:11-15)

-----------------------------

An interesting passage that needs serious attention. We read that after the women's had seen the alleged resurrection the guards found out of the empty tomb, they went to the chief priests to told them what had happened, and the the CHIEFE PRIEST DEVISED A PLAN AND PAID THE SOLDIERS MONEY?  AND HIS WAS WIDELY CIRCULATED AMONGST THE JEWS TOLL THIS DAY?

Let's analyse this Matthew is telling us that the chief priest turned to deception by making a plan and resulting to making the soldiers lie by bribing them, this is highly unlikely when there very one Torah said :

“You shall not steal; you shall not deal falsely; you shall not lie to one another.
(Levitcus 19:11)

A gift given in secret soothes anger, and a bribe concealed in the cloak pacifies great wrath.(Proverbs 21:14)

The above verses cannot be more emphasised to tell is that lying, dealing falsely and taking or giving bribe is a great Sin, then how could such Chiefs of priests commit such and act? Seems like the Christian writer had a motive to expose Jewish rabbis!

---------------------------

Second point Notice the last part of Matthew statement says in verse 15 So the soldiers took the money and did as they were instructed. And this story has been widely circulated among the Jews to this very day ?

Where in the entire Jewish books is such an incident found where the Jews were talking about such a happening? Please give us references to Jewish document historical writing, Talmudic writing rabbis writing anyone?? Where can we verify  the soldiers took the money from the chief priests and who were those priests ?. 

A dilemma indeed this shows how made up writings like Matthews could easily get caught out red handed what a Shame !!

When was Genesis written ?!!

When was Genesis written ?!!

"They called the name of the city Dan, after the name of Dan their father who was born in Israel; however, the name of the city formerly was Laish." (Judges 18:29)

So according to the above passage this City was named after Dan the fifth son of Jacob the son of Issac the son of Abraham by some people of the tribe of Dan in the time of prophet Micah [Judges 18:26] who lived between 737-690 BC 

Now this is where it gets real interesting!!!!!

-----------------------------------------------------

"When Abram heard that his relative had been taken captive, he led out his trained men, born in his house, three hundred and eighteen, and went in pursuit as far as Dan." (Gen 14:14)

The Bible mentions that Abraham himself passed by this city which named Dan!!!!

According the Judeo-Christian sources the books of (Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy) were written by Moses at the end of his life in the wilderness just prior to the Israelites' entry into Canaan. [blue letter bible] between 1391–1271 BCE.

So Moses (And Abraham for sure) predated the time when the city was called Dan yet he mentioned it. in the light of this informations there is no way that Moses himself is the one who wrote the Book of Genesis rather it was written after him by along time, even after the time of Micah.

HOW COULD THIS BE!!!!  WHAT A MAJOR HISTORICAL ERROR SHAME!!