Jesus condoned child killing?

Jesus condoning the killing of children's through the Torah!

Below we read a couple of commandments made by God in the Torah on what punishment should be given to a child who curses his parents..,

--------------

Anyone who curses their father or mother is to be put to death.

(Exodus 21:17)

Anyone who curses their father or mother is to be put to death. Because they have cursed their father or mother, their blood will be on their own head. (Leviticus 20:9)

_______________________________________________________

Interesting We read Jesus accepting the law of killing children's who curse their parents!?? Bear in mind he never condemned it rather reminded the Jews how they are not obeying the law.... Only Because the Jews challenged his disciples why they don't wash their hands? I urged you all to read mark 15:3-6... I'll only post verses 3-4 

3 But he (Jesus) answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?

4 For God commanded, saying, Honour thy father and mother: and, He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death.

The above verses carry on saying how the Jews don't obey the killing law given in the torah, and they changed it for another... This only tells us Jesus would allow the killing of children's who disobey there parents....

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

It's is clear from the above this man Christians call the prince of peace was obeying of the OT law and we know that from his own lips (Matthew 5:17) Imagine how many more sick laws are there in the OT that Jesus neither commended nor abrogated... Other then divorce or hate 

No wonder we read passages like 

"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send 

peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his 

father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter-in-law 

against her mother-in-law" (Matthew 10, 34, 35).

------------

Either Jesus or the author got it wrong. The question is, which one?

1 Then Pharisees and scribes came to Jesus from Jerusalem and said, 2 “Why do your disciples break the tradition of the elders? For they do not wash their hands when they eat.”  3 He answered them, “And why do you break the commandment of God for the sake of your tradition? 4 For God commanded, ‘Honor your father and your mother,’ and, ‘Whoever reviles father or mother must surely die.’ 5 But you say, ‘If anyone tells his father or his mother, “What you would have gained from me is given to God,”6 he need not honor his father.’ So for the sake of your tradition you have made void the word of God.(Matthew 15:1-6)

Either Jesus of the author got it wrong. Tradition of the elders does not say to wash hands, rather washing hands as purity is found in the Torah.

The washing of hands is required before eating a meal at which bread is served. One reason for hand washing is purely mundane: to clean them before eating. The origin of this law, however, is biblical (Exodus 30:17-21). Moses was commanded to make a copper laver and to place it at the entrance to the altar area so that Aaron and his sons could wash their hands before approaching the altar to offer sacrifices. Verse 20 concludes, “. . .and it shall be for them a statute forever.” The washing of hands makes them ritually pure. This symbolic expression of washing away impurity from one’s hands dates back to Temple times, when the priests (Kohanim), as described above with Aaron, devoted their lives to the Temple and its sacrificial system. Before performing any ritual, a Kohein was required to wash his hands, making himself pure and ready to offer a sacrifice.

Saying this was tradition makes Jesus or the author ignorant of the "Torah" this raises the question, did they even know about Exodus 30? Was not Jesus a learned rabbi? Calling the commands of Yahweh as traditions of the elders dismissed the validity of that book. Note, the author is writing what the Pharisees said which cannot be verified, since he was a Christian he won't favour the Jews in the first place. Also Jews don't claim washing hands is a tradition

Is wife beating prohibited in the bible ?

Nowhere in the entire bible is wife beating prohibited rather disciplining your wife and family is urged??

Whoever heeds discipline shows the way to life, but whoever ignores correction leads others astray. (Proverbs 10:17)

Below I will show wife beating is allowed since it's not prohibited! 

-------------------

To keep thee from the evil woman, from the flattery of the tongue of a strange woman. (Proverbs 6:24)

What happens if you have an evil wife? Bible gives you the answer 

Beatings and wounds cleanse away evil, and floggings cleanse the innermost being. 

(Proverbs 20:30)

So from the above texts the only way to get rid of evils is to Beat it out now one may ask what about my wife she's not perfect well bible allows you can beat to fix her..

Hard evidence Jesus of the bible openly lied

( a challenge to Christians to prove us wrong)

Then some of the scribes and Pharisees said to him: "Teacher, we wish to see a sign from you." But he answered them: "An evil and adulterous generation seeks for a sign; but no sign shall be given to it except the sign of the prophet Jonah. For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the whale, so will the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth."

(Matthew 12:38--40)

------------

My challenge is show us one evidence from any of the Gospels where the Jews witnessed Jesus resurrect as the sign he offered them. We are told his disciples witnessed him, but the challenge was given to the Pharisees Jews rabbis not the disciples. Bring your evidence if you are truthful. Also what makes one laugh is, Christians pretend they get signs from Jesus saying, Jesus came to them or spoke to them or touched them, yet when the main head Jews of that time asked for a sign from Jesus and they got nothing.

In short:

WHAT JEWISH RABBI OR PHARISEE SAW JESUS AFTER 3 DAYS & 3 NIGHTS. SHOW US THAT YOUR JESUS DID NOT LIE TO THE JEWS!

Pull out the verses to prove he didn't, If you can't show us from the bible show us from the Jewish writers of Sanhedrin? You are allowed to use the Talmud

Unfulfilled Prophecy

Unfulfilled Prophecy

Below we read how Abraham was tricked by Yahweh how god will give him the whole land of Canaan, did he get the land as promised? 

--------------

In the same day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates (Genesis 15:18)

And I will give the entire land of Canaan, where you now live as a foreigner, to you and your descendants. It will be their possession forever, and I will be their God."

(Genesis 17:8, Genesis 13:15)

          

                                          Bible god did not fulfil his promise to Abraham  

God gave him no property here, not even a foot of land, yet he promised to give it to him and to his descendants after him as a permanent possession, even though he had no child. (Acts 7:5)

Bible god tricked Abraham into thinking he will own all land? And Christians trick the world thinking they will be saved lol

--------

In those days Hezekiah became ill and was at the point of death. The prophet Isaiah son of Amoz went to him and said, "This is what the LORD says: Put your house in order, because you are going to die; you will not recover." (2 kings 20:1)

Did Yahweh lie or simply change his mind?

"Return and say to Hezekiah the leader of My people, 'Thus says the LORD, the God of your father David, "I have heard your prayer, I have seen your tears; behold, I will heal you. On the third day you shall go up to the house of the LORD. 6"I will add fifteenyears to your life, and I will deliver you and this cityfrom the hand of the king of Assyria; and I will defendthis city for My own sake and for My servant David'ssake."'" (2kings 20:5-6)

There you have it, one moment Yahweh revealed to Isaiah that King Hezekiah's will not make it. Next moment he changes his mind and added more years to King Hezekiah's life.

Did Yahweh not say he doesn’t change his mind or was a it a lie you decide. Also notice how Isaiah was misled by a false prophecy. Isaiah even went and announced it to King Hezekiah, how embarrassing.

 

 

Yahweh changes his mind

 

Perhaps they will listen and each one will turn back from his evil way, and I will change my mind concerning* the calamity that I intend to bring on them because of their evil deeds.+ (jeremiah 26:3)

 

Missing books of the bible !

The Lost Books of the Bible

Books mentioned, but not found, in ihe bible

Question is, why are many books mentioned in the bible, but not included?

Book of Jasher  Here

Joshua 10:13  And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, until the people had avenged themselves upon their enemies. Is not this written in the book of Jasher? So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day.

2 Samuel 1:18 (Also he bade them teach the children of Judah the use of the bow: behold, it is written in the book of Jasher.) 

Book of Enoch   Here

 Jude 1:14  And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints,

The Manner of the Kingdom / Book of Statutes  (Missing)

1 Samuel 10:25  Then Samuel told the people the manner of the kingdom, and wrote it in a book, and laid it up before the Lord. And Samuel sent all the people away, every man to his house. 

Book of Samuel the Seer  (Missing) 

1 Chronicles 29:29  Now the acts of David the king, first and last, behold, they are written in the book of Samuel the seer, and in the book of Nathan the prophet, and in the book of Gad the seer,

Nathan the Prophet  (Missing) 

1 Chronicles 29:29  Now the acts of David the king, first and last, behold, they are written in the book of Samuel the seer, and in the book of Nathan the prophet, and 

in the book of Gad the seer,

2 Chronicles 9:29  Now the rest of the acts of Solomon, first and last, are they not written in the book of Nathan the prophet, and in the prophecy of Ahijah the Shilonite, and in the visions of Iddo the seer against Jeroboam the son of Nebat?

The Book of the Acts of Solomon  (Missing) 

1 Kings 11:41  And the rest of the acts of Solomon, and all that he did, and his wisdom, are they not written in the book of the acts of Solomon? 

Shemaiah the Prophet  (Missing)

2 Chronicles 12:15  Now the acts of Rehoboam, first and last, are they not written in the book of Shemaiah the prophet, and of Iddo the seer concerning genealogies? And there were wars between Rehoboam and Jeroboam continually.

Prophecy of Abijah  (Missing)

2 Chronicles 9:29  Now the rest of the acts of Solomon, first and last, are they not written in the book of Nathan the prophet, and in the prophecy of Ahijah the Shilonite, and in the visions of Iddo the seer against Jeroboam the son of Nebat?

Story of Prophet Iddo  (Missing)

2 Chronicles 13:22  And the rest of the acts of Abijah, and his ways, and his sayings, are written in  the story of the prophet Iddo.

Visions of Iddo the Seer  (Missing)

2 Chronicles 9:29  Now the rest of the acts of Solomon, first and last, are they not written in the book of Nathan the prophet, and in the prophecy of Ahijah the Shilonite, and in the visions of Iddo the seer against Jeroboam the son of Nebat?

Iddo Genealogies  (Missing)

2 Chronicles 12:15 Now the acts of Rehoboam, first and last, are they not written in the book of Shemaiah the prophet, and of Iddo the seer concerning genealogies? And there were wars between Rehoboam and Jeroboam continually.

Book of Jehu  (Missing) 

2 Chronicles 20:34  Now the rest of the acts of Jehoshaphat, first and last, behold, they are written in the book of Jehu the son of Hanani, who is mentioned in the book of the kings of Israel.

Sayings of the Seers  Here

2 Chronicles 33:19   His prayer also, and how God was intreated of him, and all his sin, and his trespass, and the places wherein he built high places, and set up groves and graven images, before he was humbled: behold, they are written among the sayings of the seers. 

Book of the Covenant  (Missing) 

Exodus 24:7   And he took the book of the covenant, and read in the audience of the people: and they said, All that the Lord hath said will we do, and be obedient.

There are those that believe the Book of the Covenant is found in Exodus chapters 20 through 23. There are no authoritative sources for this text.

Book of the Wars of the Lord  (Missing)

Numbers 21:14  Wherefore it is said in the book of the wars of the Lord, What he did in the Red sea, and in the brooks of Arnon,

Certain sources believe that this is to be found by drawing text from several Old Testament books.  There are no authoritative sources for this text.

Book of Gad the Seer  (Missing) 

1 Chronicles 29:29  Now the acts of David the king, first and last, behold, they are written in the book of Samuel the seer, and in the book of Nathan the prophet, and in the book of Gad the seer, 

Epistle to Corinth  Here

1 Corinthians 5:9  I wrote unto you in an epistle not to company with fornicators: 

Epistle to the Ephesians  (Missing) 

Ephesians  3:3  How that by revelation he made known unto me the mystery; (as I wrote afore in few words,  4 Whereby, when ye read, ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ)   

Epistle from Laodicea to the Colossians  (Missing)

 Colossians 4:16  And when this epistle is read among you, cause that it be read also in the church of the Laodiceans; and that ye likewise read the epistle from Laodicea. 

Nazarene Prophecy Source  (Missing)

Matthew 2:23  And he came and dwelt in a city called Nazareth: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets, He shall be called a Nazarene. 

Acts of Uziah  (Missing)

2 Chronicles 26:22  Now the rest of the acts of Uzziah, first and last, did Isaiah the prophet, the son of Amoz, write.

The Annals of King David  (Missing) 

1 Chronicles 27:24  Joab son of Zeruiah began to count the men but did not finish. Wrath came on Israel on account of this numbering, and the number was not entered in the book of the annals of King David.

Jude, the Missing Epistle  (Missing)

Jude 1:3   Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.

Chronicles of King Ahasuerus  (Missing) 

 Esther 2:23  And when inquisition was made of the matter, it was found out; therefore they were both hanged on a tree: and it was written in the book of the chronicles before the king.

Esther 6:1  On that night could not the king sleep, and he commanded to bring the book of records of the chronicles; and they were read before the king.

Chronicles of the Kings of Media and Persia  (Missing)

Esther 10:2 And all the acts of his power and of his might, and the declaration of the greatness of Mordecai, whereunto the king advanced him, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Media and Persia?

The Chronicles of King David  (Missing)

I Chronicles 27:24 Joab the son of Zeruiah began to number, but he finished not, because there fell wrath for it against Israel; neither was the number put in the account of the chronicles of king David.

The  Chronicles of the Kings of Israel  (Missing)

I. Kings 14:19 And the rest of the acts of Jeroboam, how he warred, and how he reigned, behold, they are written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel.

15:31 Now the rest of the acts of Nadab, and all that he did, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel? 

16:5 Now the rest of the acts of Baasha, and what he did, and his might, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel? 

16:14 Now the rest of the acts of Elah, and all that he did, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel? 

16:20 Now the rest of the acts of Zimri, and his treason that he wrought, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel? 

16:27 Now the rest of the acts of Omri which he did, and his might that he shewed, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel? 

22:39 Now the rest of the acts of Ahab, and all that he did, and the ivory house which he made, and all the cities that he built, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel? 

II Kings 1:18 Now the rest of the acts of Ahaziah which he did, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel? 

10:34 Now the rest of the acts of Jehu, and all that he did, and all his might, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel? 

13:8 Now the rest of the acts of Jehoahaz, and all that he did, and his might, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel? 

13:12 And the rest of the acts of Joash, and all that he did, and his might wherewith he fought against Amaziah king of Judah, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel? 

14:15 Now the rest of the acts of Jehoash which he did, and his might, and how he fought with Amaziah king of Judah, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel? 

14:28 Now the rest of the acts of Jeroboam, and all that he did, and his might, how he warred, and how he recovered Damascus, and Hamath, which belonged to Judah, for Israel, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel? 

15:10 And Shallum the son of Jabesh conspired against him, and smote him before the people, and slew him, and reigned in his stead. 

15:15 And the rest of the acts of Shallum, and his conspiracy which he made, behold, they are written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel. 

15:21 And the rest of the acts of Menahem, and all that he did, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel? 

15:26 And the rest of the acts of Pekahiah, and all that he did, behold, they are written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel. 

15:31 And the rest of the acts of Pekah, and all that he did, behold, they are written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel.

The Chronicles of the Kings of Judah  (Missing)

I Kings 14:29 Now the rest of the acts of Rehoboam, and all that he did, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah? 

15:7 Now the rest of the acts of Abijam, and all that he did, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah? And there was war between Abijam and Jeroboam. 

15:23 The rest of all the acts of Asa, and all his might, and all that he did, and the cities which he built, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah? Nevertheless in the time of his old age he was diseased in his feet. 

22:45 Now the rest of the acts of Jehoshaphat, and his might that he shewed, and how he warred, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah? 

II. Kings 8:23 And the rest of the acts of Joram, and all that he did, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah?

12:19 And the rest of the acts of Joash, and all that he did, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah? 

14:18 And the rest of the acts of Amaziah, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah? 

15:6 And the rest of the acts of Azariah, and all that he did, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah? 

15:36 Now the rest of the acts of Jotham, and all that he did, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah? 

16:19 Now the rest of the acts of Ahaz which he did, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah? 

20:20 And the rest of the acts of Hezekiah, and all his might, and how he made a pool, and a conduit, and brought water into the city, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah? 

21:17 Now the rest of the acts of Manasseh, and all that he did, and his sin that he sinned, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah? 

21:25 Now the rest of the acts of Amon which he did, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah? 

23:28 Now the rest of the acts of Josiah, and all that he did, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah? 

24:5 Now the rest of the acts of Jehoiakim, and all that he did, are they not written in the book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah

Where does the sun set again?

Where does the sun set again?

In the Bible we have something interesting on these lines. Talking about the two mountains, Gerizim and Ebal, the Book of Deuteronomy tells us;

“Are they not on the other side Jordan, by the way where the sun goeth down, in the land of the Canaanites, which dwell in the campaign over against Gilgal, beside the plains of Moreh?” (KJV, Deuteronomy 11:30)

(Also in the book of judges we are told the sun set upon them?)

And they passed on and went their way; and the sun went down upon them when they were by Gibeah, which belongeth to Benjamin.

(Judges 19:14)

-----------------

Just a reminder from your own book

“Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.” (KJV, Matthew 7: 1-2)

Disciples doubted?

If the Disciples of Jesus doubted why should you agree?.

It's funny when Christians claim the crucifixion was a fulfilment and the disciples were aware of it?? 

If that's the case why did they doubt? Surely they should of been waiting for such a fulfilment right! Why did Peter rebuke Jesus when Jesus apparently mentioned he has to suffer! Surely Peter should of accepted it right?? Unless he knew the messiah has to live and not get crucified!!!!  

Peter took him aside and began to rebuke him. "Never, Lord!" he said. "This shall never happen to you!" (Matthew 16:22)

Below is a few passages showing how the disciples doubted Jesus was crucified 

--------------------------------------------------------

When they heard that Jesus was alive and that she had seen him, they did not believe it. (Mark 16:11)

These returned and reported it to the rest; but they did not believe them either.

(Mark 16:13)

Later Jesus appeared to the Eleven as they were eating; he rebuked them for their lack of faith and their stubborn refusal to believe those who had seen him after he had risen. (Mark 16:14)

When they saw him, they worshiped him; but some doubted.

(Matthew 28:17)

But they did not believe the women, because their words seemed to them like nonsense. (Luke 24:11)

And while they yet believed not for joy, and wondered, he said unto them, Have ye here any meat? (Luke 24:41)

Who's greater Solomon or Jesus ?

Solomon or Jesus ?

Bible tells us solomon was greater then Jesus, not only was he greater he sat on the throne of The Lord and was obeyed by all Israel . On the other hand we read Jesus sat at the right hand of God?

Bear in mind the throne of The Lord mentioned in 1 chronicles 29:23

In Hebrew states ( Yahweh  יְהוָ֧ה ) incase you think Lord means something else.

__________________________________________________________________

So Solomon sat on the throne of the LORD  ( Yahweh  יְהוָ֧ה ) as king in place of his father David. He prospered and all Israel obeyed him.

1 chronicles 29:23

                             -solomon greater then Jesus-

After the Lord Jesus had spoken to them, he was taken up into heaven and he sat at the right hand of God.

Mark 16:19

__________________________________________________________________

Seems like God not only gave solomon his throne to sit on he also made the whole of Israel to obey him, and left out Jesus with all glory, first he forsakes him then he makes him sit on he's right hand side!

SHAME!!!

Who do you think John the Baptist is referring to?

If its not Jesus, Nor John the Baptist Who is it referring to??

Can u guess

--------------

Lets read the statements below made by two prophets 

"Verily I (Jesus) say unto you, Among them that are born of women there hath not risen a greater than John the Baptist." Not even Jesus? Jesus (pbuh) was born of a woman. (Matthew 11:11)

And this was his message: "After me comes the one more powerful than I, the straps of whose sandals I am not worthy to stoop down and untie.

(Mark 1:17)

Jesus pbuh is openly publicly testifying that John the Baptist is greater then him,

and John the Baptist who didn't say the name of Jesus said one greater then him will arrive? it must refer to someone else 

Who could it be??

One man has 2000 demons Inside him?

One man has 2000 demons Inside him?

The New Testament reports an incident were Jesus "Restores a Demon-Possessed Man"

 For Jesus had said to him, “Come out of this man, you impure spirit!” Then Jesus asked him, “What is your name?” “My name is Legion,” he replied, “for we are many.” And he begged Jesus again and again not to send them out of the area. A large herd of pigs was feeding on the nearby hillside. The demons begged Jesus, “Send us among the pigs; allow us to go into them.”  He gave them permission, and the impure spirits came out and went into the pigs. The herd, about two thousand in number, rushed down the steep bank into the lake and were drowned. (Mark 5:8-13)

When they came to Jesus, they saw the man who had been possessed by the legion of demons, sitting there, dressed and in his right mind; and they were afraid.

(Mark 5:15)

From the above passages, we read Jesus freed a  man who was possessed by the legion of demons. The demons begged Jesus to send then to the herds of pigs, "2000 in numbers"  the demons went into the pigs, and rushed down a steep bank into the lake and drowned.

Here's where it gets real interesting.

--------------------------------------------------------

First Let's find out what legion means ?

legion

ˈliːdʒ(ə)n/

noun

a division of 3,000–6,000 men, including a complement of cavalry, in the ancient Roman army.

synonyms: brigade, regiment, battalion, company, troop, division, squadron, squad, platoon, contingent, unit, force, corps, garrison, section, group, detachment, commando, battery, band, outfit, cohort

"a Roman legion"the Foreign Legion.

a vast number of people or things.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Gills Exposition of the entire bible commentary

and he answered, saying, my name is Legion: the Syriac version renders it, "our name is Legion"; the reason of which name is given,

for we are many: as a Roman legion did consist of many, though its number was not always alike: in the time of Romulus, a legion consisted of three thousand foot, and three hundred horse; afterwards, when the city was, increased, of six thousand foot, and six hundred horse; sometimes it was six thousand and two hundred foot, and three hundred horse; sometimes four thousand foot, and three hundred horse; sometimes five thousand foot, and three hundred horse (x). Some make a legion to consist of six thousand six hundred sixty six; and others make it much larger, even twelve thousand five hundred: however, the number in a legion was many; hence the word is retained among the Jews, and is used for a large number, either of persons or things; as, , "a legion of olives" (y): that is, a large number of them; though sometimes it is used of a single person, who has others under him, as the general of an army: thus it is said (z) that one man should say to another,

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary

A legion of soldiers consisted of six thousand men, or more. What multitudes of fallen spirits there must be, and all enemies to God and man, when here was a legion in one poor wretched creature! Many there are that rise up against us.

Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary

And he answered, saying, My name is Legion: for we are many—or, as in Luke (Lu 8:30) "because many devils [demons] were entered into him." A legion, in the Roman army, amounted, at its full complement, to six thousand; but here the word is used, as such words with us, and even this one, for an indefinitely large number—large enough however to rush, as soon as permission was given, into two thousand swine and destroy them.

----------------------------------

From the above commentaries and definitions, we come to know the term legion and how many can consist to make up a legion. Also we are told 2000 pigs were possessed by the devils indicating the man had 2000 demons inside him or more?

My question is Christians make mockery of 2Satan in the upper part of the nose", yet can accept 2000 demons residing inside one man?

What's more hard to believe "1 Satan" in the nose or "2000 demons" in the body? Note we are being generous by saying 2000 demons, since a legion would consist over 3000 plus. can you imagine 2000 demons inside one man? where did they all find places to reside? did one stay in this brain, another in his nose, another in his stomach. i mean how did they all fit ?

my Christian friends please enlighten us

YOU DECIDE.....

An Absolute Unreliable Historical Event

An unreliable so called historical event (stripped apart) 

Below we will show a serious error concerning the so called resurrection Christians boast took place... This paper will evidently prove the whole resurrection was a hoax and Christians need to get over this false teaching Paul invented..

We shall examine two different accounts portrayed in the so called gospels, one by Matthew the other by John, and see how both contradict each other stupendously.

Infact john is the cause of the problem as we will see!! But before that I wanna share a quote from Paul in which he says:

And if Christ has not been raised, our preaching is useless and so is your faith.

(1 Corinthians 15:14)

Let's put Paul and his Christian followers to shame....

----------------------------------

MATTHEW'S ACCOUNT

According to Matthew, Mary Magdalene (and also "the other Mary") went to the tomb at dawn on the first day of the week. As they did so, the stone blocking it was moved aside by an angel.

Now after the Sabbath, toward the dawn of the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary went to see the tomb. And behold, there was a great earthquake, for an angel of the Lord descended from heaven and came and rolled back the stone and sat on it. (Matthew 28:1-2)

It is not clear whether they actually saw the angel do this. In any case, after the angel speaks to them (verses 5-7), they leave - filled with joy - to inform the disciples. On the way, they actually encounter Jesus himself.

So they departed quickly from the tomb with fear and great joy, and ran to tell his disciples. And behold, Jesus met them and said, "Greetings!" And they came up and took hold of his feet and worshiped him.

(Matthew 28:8-9)

---------------------------------------

JOHN'S ACCOUNT

John also describes an early morning visit by Mary Magdalene to the tomb. She finds the tomb deserted and tells Simon Peter and John that the body had been stolen.

Now on the first day of the week Mary Magdalene came to the tomb early, while it was still dark, and saw that the stone had been taken away from the tomb. So she ran and went to Simon Peter and the other disciple, the one whom Jesus loved, and said to them, "They have taken the Lord out of the tomb, and we do not know where they have laid him." 

(John 20:1-2)

The problem is obvious: if Mary met an angel at the tomb, and then Jesus himself (as Matthew says) then why does she merely report that the body had been stolen?

----------------------------------

John later describes a second visit by Mary to the tomb. Perhaps one can say that the visit described in Matthew 28 is this second visit, which is at John 20:11-12 and onwards:

But Mary stood weeping outside the tomb, and as she wept she stooped to look into the tomb. And she saw two angels in white, sitting where the body of Jesus had lain, one at the head and one at the feet.  (John 20:11-12)

But this doesn't work. In John, the stone was removed before Mary Magdalene's first visit. And yet, Matthew 28:2 says that the stone was removed as Mary Magdalene and the other Mary were arriving; so he must be talking about that first visit, not the second visit.

Furthermore, Matthew is clearly describing the same visit to the tomb as Mark 16:1-8. In Mark, we are told that Mary and friends were bringing spices to the tomb to anoint Jesus' body with, whilst worrying about how they were going to move the stone. This makes no sense if Mary already knew the body was missing.

So, it seems we're forced into saying that Matthew and Mark are talking about the first visit John describes, in which case it's bizarre that Mary tells the disciples the body has been stolen, and then weeps at the empty tomb.

--------------------------------------

AN IMPOSSIBLE SOLUTION

Apparently, the standard solution to this problem from apologist is to say: yes, Matthew is describing Mary's first visit, but she panicked and ran away (as per John 20:1-2) as soon as she saw the stone was missing. And so, she never actually met Jesus (or the angel) at that point. But this explanation is impossible. Matthew's account only mentions two women, and then says that "they" met Jesus on their way to tell the disciples about the angel.

It's certainly true that Mark's account mentions a third woman, Salome. But Matthew does not, so he can't expect his readers to understand "they" as referring to anyone but Mary Magdalene and the other Mary, who are the only women he mentions. Likewise, Matthew refers to "the women" at verse 28:5, and this faces exactly the same problem - which women? He can only mean Mary and Mary.

Anyway, this analysis is overly technical. Just reading Matthew 28:1-9 should convince any normal reader. Matthew's meaning is crystal clear.

SHAME SHAME !!!!

Will people eat, drink and have pleasure in heaven?

Will people eat, drink and have pleasure in heaven?

It's a question that's been discussed for a long time, both Muslims and Christians differ  or do they really? Could it be that the Christians who read the bible have misunderstood the texts and interpret it the way it suits them?  It will only take a few verses from the bible to prove that in paradise men's and Womans will eat and even have sexual activity...below We shall share a few passages and examine them :

At the resurrection people will neither marry nor be given in marriage; they will be like the angels in heaven. (Matthew 22:30)

I tell you I will not drink again of this fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father’s kingdom.” (Matthew 26:29)

                                  <After his alleged resurrection>

They gave Him a piece of a broiled fish,and He took it and ate it before them.

(Luke 24:42-43)

While he was blessing them, he left them and was taken up into heaven.

(Luke 24:51)

---------------------------------

Now from the above passages it seems very contradictory when Jesus says there will be marriage not will they be given in marriage? And they will be like angels? The problem we have it if everyone turns out like angels then this wouldn't make any changes within there desires or sexual activity we read in genesis Angels came down to have see with womans of the earth

The Nephilim were on the earth at that time (and also immediately afterward), when those divine beings were having sexual relations with those human women, who gave birth to children for them. These children became the heroes and legendary figures of ancient times.  (Genesis 6:4)

And everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father or mother or wife or children or fields for my sake will receive a hundred times as much and will inherit eternal life. (Matthew 19:29)

How about having 100 wives in heaven? What does a man do with hundred wives just sit with them and play the harp lol

---------------------------------

Spirits don't eat why would they they are not physical like humans they are unseen they can go through solid matters so why eat what good would that do? How would food or drink Benefit sow thing which is not physical or matter? But we read angels eating food again found in genesis..  

He then brought some curds and milk and the calf that had been prepared, and set these before them. While they ate, he stood near them under a tree.

(Genesis 18:8)

Again it seems like eating and drinking or having sex wouldn't make any difference in heaven even if you become like an Angel since Angels have desires and do the same as humans 

Just to top it up we read from the Gospels that Jesus ascended to heaven in his physical body?? Now even if we took it as a miracle event this still doesn't answer how a physical body can live without food or drink or desire...  Bible is very explicit with a physical body in heaven, we also find other Prophets such a Enoch and Elijah who, have ascended to heaven in there physical body:

And after my skin has been destroyed, yet in my flesh I will see God

(Job 19:26)

so that you may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom and sit on thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. (Luke 22:30)

When one of those at the table with him heard this, he said to Jesus, "Blessed is the one who will eat at the feast in the kingdom of God."

(Luke 14:15)

There we have it food drink sex all available in paradise, don't let these Christians deceive you!!!

Jesus confirms Old Testament is from Satan

Jesus Confirms the Old Testament is from satan!

We have an interesting passage found in the book of Matthew where Jesus preaches about oaths and what should and shouldn't be done, let's read the passage below to make it clearer 

--------

33 “Again you have heard that it was said to those of old, ‘You shall not swear falsely, but shall perform to the Lord what you have sworn.’ 34 But I say to you, Do not take an oath at all, either by heaven, for it is the throne of God, 35 or by the earth, for it is his footstool, or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King. 36 And do not take an oath by your head, for you cannot make one hair white or black. 37 Let what you say be simply ‘Yes’ or ‘No’; anything more than this comes from the evil one!

(Matthew 5:33-37)

---------

Read carefully what the above passage says , SWEARING by anything even God is considered to be from the Evil one (Satan) !!! 

Now the Ultimate Golden Million Dollar Question is does the Old Testament tell us to SWEAR BY GOD? If so we shall consider it a saying from SATAN THE EVIL ONE... Bear in mind Jesus himself said whoever swears by god etc.. :

-------------

"You shall fear only the LORD your God; and you shall worship Him and swear by His name. (Deuteronomy 6:13)

But the king will rejoice in God; all who swear by God will glory in him, while the mouths of liars will be silenced. (Psalm 63:11)

You shall fear the LORD your God. You shall serve him and hold fast to him, and by his name you shall swear. (Deuteronomy 10:20)

----------

There you have it a confirmation by Jesus that certain passages from the Old Testament are Satan Inspired!! 

Also Notice when Jesus was temped by Satan he quoted from the Old Testament a passages found in Deuteronomy yet dint add the statement swear by his name? Maybe because he knew it was an additional saying by Satan.. The evidence is within the text.

Jesus answered, "It is written: 'Worship the Lord your God and serve him only.'"

(Luke 4:8)

Sorry ladies no women's allowed !!

Sorry ladies, NO Woman's allowed!!! 

Shockingly the bible tells us how woman's will have to become men's if they want to be part of Christ!!

Dear friends, now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when Christ appears, we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is. (1 john 3:2)

who, by the power that enables him to bring everything under his control, will transform our lowly bodies so that they will be like his glorious body.

(Philippians 3:21)

And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly. (1 Corinthians 15:49)

___________________________________________________________

From those three verses, Dr. Ruckman derives his teaching that in heaven all Christians will become exact replicas of Jesus Christ. All of us will become bearded 33 year old Jewish males. He then taught us in Bible class that this ALL-MALE bride of Christ will literally marry Christ in heaven and "physically consummate the marriage." He described life in heaven as "an orgasmic high."

 "In the Millennium, stupid, Christ is right on a throne in Jerusalem where anybody can see Him. If that weren't enough, with Him will be all the saved people between Pentecost and the Rapture; according to 1 John 3:1-2, Philippians 3:21, and 1 Corinthians 15:44-49, each one will be a perfect replica of Jesus Christ. During the Millenium, there will be across this world a minimum, I would say, of 500 million exact reproductions of God's Son, minus the wounds." -Dr. Peter S. Ruckman, Ph.D

(What's fascinating we even have concreted reference from apocrypha book which even though Christians reject, the fact it has it in there says something ,)

114) Simon Peter said to him, "Let Mary leave us, for women are not worthy of life." Jesus said, "I myself shall lead her in order to make her male, so that she too may become a living spirit resembling you males. For every woman who will make herself male will enter the kingdom of heaven." Gospel of Thomas 114

               -----------------------CONCLUSION------------------------

1. Dr.Ruckman deduce from 1 John 3:2, Philippians 3:21 and 1 Corinthians 15:49 that Jesus would have orgasmic gay sex with all the Christian men.)

2. If Jesus is the God of OT and he can give Solomon some 300 women with no complaints at all, what is the problem with you when a Muslim just has 72?

3. Many Christians such as Peter Kereeft logically proves that there would be sex in heaven.

All you  Christian woman's who believe you will go heaven and dwell with Christ,

Sorry you'll have to first transform into a man before you could even get close!!

SHAME!!!!