Christians brag that Jesus was the prefect lamb and fit for sacrifice, but was he really?

but with the precious blood of Christ, a lamb without blemish or defect.(1 Peter 1:19)

---------------

How could Jesus of the bible be the perfect lamb without blemish or defect when he was CIRCUMCISED? This would make him invalid for a perfect sacrifice, because he had a DEFECT. He is no longer pure, his Foreskin is missing and under the law this Sacrifice will not be accepted, (Note human sacrifice is not allowed according to the OT)

And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name was called JESUS, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb. (Luke 2:21)

------------------

What fascinating, according to the Talmud Moses was born circumcised.

The verse states with regard to the birth of Moses: “And the woman conceived, and bore a son; and when she saw him that he was a goodly [tov] child, she hid him three months” (Exodus 2:2). It is taught in a baraita that Rabbi Meir says: “Tov” is his, Moses’, real name, as it was given to him by his parents when he was born. Rabbi Yehuda says: His name was Toviya. Rabbi Neḥemya says: They said he was good because they saw that he was fit for prophecy. Others say: They said he was good because he was born when he was already circumcised. And the Rabbis say: At the time when Moses was born, the entire house was filled with light, as it is written here: “And when she saw him that he was a goodly [tov] child,” and it is written there: “And God saw the light, that it was good [tov]” (Genesis 1:4). (Talmud Sotah 12a:17)

imagine that Moses superseded Jesus, which means Jesus is no longer like Moses (Deuteronomy 18:18). if Christians want to challenge this show us from the Torah where Moses was circumcised?