No evidence at all

Christians claim Jesus was crucified and raised on the third day. They go as far as saying they have historical evidence for this?  What ironic about their claim is, Christians are basing their evidence of contemporary source's which originally stems from the same book which was written much after the "supposed crucifixion"  what do we mean by that? Well, the first source would be the gospel of Mark and the writings of Paul. Any other writings regarding the crucifixion was taken from those first books.

Mark's writing was borrowed by Luke and Matthew. John on the other used all three books prior to his writing. Mark's source would be Q. so in other words we have no first hand eye witness evidence for the crucifixion or resurrection.

Christians say many people witnessed the crucifixion as mentioned in all for gospels, but this argument is weak since we have no written sources by any of those numerous eye witnesses? Now Christians would defend this idea by saying, the people who were present were uneducated peasants who did not know how to write. They were local village people they had no reason to document this. And for once we can agree that’s true, but what about the Romans and Jewish rabbis, scribes, pharisees, sadducees?  They were learned men of their time. Those Jewish rabbis were well equipped in reading and writing, how comes they never made mention of Jesus being put on trial and crucified and taken down within hours, without having his legs broken? Or the darkening of sky and the temple curtain torn after a massive earthquake?

In the nineteenth century an eminent scholar, Rabbi Wise, searched the records of Pilate’s court, still extant, for evidence of this trial. He found nothing. (Lloyd Graham, Deceptions and Myths of the Bible, p. 343)

Here's where it gets more interesting.  All those so called historians Christians bring as evidence, none have written that Jesus rose after three days and was seen by his disciple?  In fact there is no 1st century historian who witnessed the crucifixion or resurrection.

Below is a list of historians who existed during the first century, where are there writings about Jesus?

Apollonius Persius                                    Appian Petronius

Arrian Phaedrus                                        Aulus Gellius Philo-Judaeus

Columella Phlegon                                    Damis Pliny the Elder

Dio Chrysostom Pliny the Younger             Dion Pruseus Plutarch

Epictetus Pompon Mela                             Favorinus Ptolemy

Florus Lucius Quintilian                             Hermogones Quintius Curtius

Josephus Seneca                                       Justus of Tiberius Silius Italicus

Juvenal Statius                                          Lucanus Suetonius

Lucian Tacitus                                           Lysias Theon of Smyran

Martial Valerius Flaccus                             Paterculus Valerius Maximus

Pausanias

Not a single historian made mention of Jesus being crucified or resurrecting? Though crucifixion was a common method and writing that a criminal was crucified would not shock the ordinary  historian, no historian wrote about a man called Jesus resurrected.

This raises a lot of problem for Christians.  a historian who wrote  of Jesus being crucified, doesn't mention anything of the same Jesus being resurrected? What does that tell you?