The NT mentions not
everything related to Jesus is documented
Scholars mention how
historically “inspired” Books and writings within the Bible were lost.
Hence Qur’ān mentioning
something about Jesus not found in the present Bible, doesn't necessitate it's
false As the Philosophers say, “Absence of evidence is not evidence of Absence”
Scholars Admit the Qur’ān didn't copy from the Infancy Gospel, but it's the
other way around.
Moreover, The only two
surviving manuscripts date from 1299 AD and the 15th/16th century in Arabic.
The Scholars they say,
there were no Christian groups to have copied the Qur’ān from.
Even the Bible, wasn't
translated at the time of the Prophet ﷺ, as acknowledged by many scholars.
In the Eight and Ninth
century the Bible started translating.
20th century greatest Textual
Scholar, Bruce Metzger, mentions likewise.
If the Qur’ān copied the
Bible, it'd have copied the Mistake as well, The Bible Mentions Pharoah not
with regards to Moses, but at the time of Joseph as well, Qur’ān on the other
hand mentions King in relation to Joseph, and Pharaoh at Moses's time.
Archeologists mention,
“Pharoah” wasn't used before 1,500 BC and is Anochronistic, but rather “King”
was used. The Qur’ān didn't “copied” this mistake, but rather corrected. Alḥamdulillāh
Jeffrey J. Bütz mentions how the Islāmic
understanding of Jesus is in line with Jesusʼ original first-century Jewish
followers.
Ebionites, the earliest
followers of Christ Jesus all rejected his pre-existence and divinity They
rejected Paul as a liar, Apostate, enemy of Christ
The New Jerome Biblical
commentary admits, Jesusʼ message of abiding by the Torah contradicts Paul.
Mattew and James abided by Jewish Christianity which was defeated by
Paulinism... Later re-born as Islam.
Epiphanius reveals that these later
Nazarenes were, in fact, the very same Jewish converts who directly inherited
their church from the Apostles in first-century Jerusalem. The Panarion of
Epiphanius of Salamis: Book I (Sects 146) (Nag Hammadi and Manichaean Studies)
James Tabor a Professor of
Early Christianity says, The “Christian faith” was originated by Paul. Not from
Jesus, Peter, John, James or any other apostles. Infact the version of Jesus
and the apostles was quite opposite to that of Paul. This is the lost forgotton
Christianity.
Bart Ehrman says,
Christian leaders in Paul's time, considered his views to be a corruption of
the true message of Jesus.
Another Scholar says, Paul
is the First ‘Christian’ Heretic and his Teachings are a flagrant deviation
from the ‘original’ or ‘Pure’ form.
William Winwood Reade says, The Christians
of Judea, who had faithfully followed the customs and tenets of the twelve
apostles, were informed that they were heretics... The single Deity of the Jews
had been exchanged for the Trinity.
It is clear that just
prior to the second century, Jewish Christianity had been in “the comfortable
majority, as it was in the first generation of disciples and in the end of the
New Testament period.”
Regarding this common white-washing of history,
the great Anglican bishop R. P. C. Hanson writes:
So in conclusion, The Qur’ān didn't copy
from the Bible or Gnostics The Qur’ān corrected the Bible The Qur’ān knows very
well about the historical Jesus, and his original followers, as admitted by the
Scholars.
Here is a paradox of
world-historical proportions: Jewish Christianity indeed disappeared within the
Christian church, but was preserved in Islam. —Professor Hans-Joachim Schoeps,
religious historian and philosopher.
….
No comments:
Post a Comment