Wednesday, 1 February 2017

Is Jesus of the bible the Son of Yahweh or Satan ? (This ones really going to hurt)


Christians love drumming into your ear that Jesus is the son of God. Christians have this pre programmed mentality that whatever you do don't forget to preach that Jesus is the son of God. Now this has always been the case when Muslims and Christians debate. A debate will not be complete until the son of God is not mentioned.

But the question is, was Jesus of the bible really the son of God? To answer this we have to go back to the beginning of the bible, the very first book Genesis and take it from there.

Nearly All Christians with an exception of a few (i.e handful) have an incorrect understanding of the story where Eve was tempted by the serpent. Unlike Jews Christians tend to use their own interpretation of the bible and that's how they get it wrong. The biblical account of the story where eve gets tempted by the serpent has a twist which Christians are unaware of. We all know that Adam and Eve were tempted into eating the fruit which took them out of the garden of Eden. What happened before them eating the fruit will shock you.

Now the serpent was cunning, more than all the beasts of the field that the Lord God had made, and it said to the woman, "Did God indeed say, 'You shall not eat of any of the trees of the garden?'" (Genesis 3:1)

Commentary

Now the serpent was cunning: What is the connection of this matter here? Scripture should have juxtaposed (below verse 21): “And He made for Adam and for his wife shirts of skin, and He dressed them.” But it teaches you as a result of what plan the serpent thrust himself upon them. He saw them naked and engaging in intercourse before everyone’s eyes, and he desired her. — [from Gen. Rabbah 18:6]
And the LORD God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat. (Genesis 3:13)
Focus on verse 13. The key word here is "beguiled" and for this we look into the Hebrew meaning. :

beguiled = Hebrew word # 5377 nasha' (naw-shaw');a primitive root; to lead astray, i.e. (mentally) to delude, or (morally) to seduce: to beguile, to deceive utterly (infinitive).

We find that this same idea is used in the New Testament Greek.

But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. (2 Corinthians 11:3)

serpent = Greek word # 3789 ophis (of'-is); probably from 3700 (through the idea of sharpness of vision); a snake, figuratively (as a type of sly cunning) an artful malicious person
beguiled = Greek word #1818 "exapatao" (ex-ap-at-ah'-o); To seduce wholly.
Bingo. Further confirmation that this was indeed a sexual act. There is only one single meaning of the Greek "exapatao" and it's quite clear.

not as Cain, who was of the evil one and slew his brother And for what reason did he slay him? Because his deeds were evil, and his brother's were righteous. (1 John 3:12)

The Greek expression translated "of the evil one" is ek poneros. The preposition ek denotes origin. It governs the genitive. The word poneros is clearly not referring to Adam or Adam's Creator. So, does this verse represent the kind of conclusive evidence we're seeking? If it does, it's not readily apparent. Due to the context of the verse, verse 8 even by itself seems to discount verse 12, declaring that "the one who practices sin is of the devil." (ek diabolos)

And I will put enmity Between you and the woman, And between your seed and her seed; He shall bruise you on the head, And you shall bruise him on the heel." (Genesis 3:15)

In reply Genesis 3:15 Yahweh says to Satan, "I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed". The same word zehra was used for both the seed of Satan and the seed of Eve. Zehra literally means seed; there is no other meaning. It also could be used as grains of wheat but it is used throughout the Bible as meaning the descendants of a person. Satan was to have just as literal children in this world as Eve was to have. The same word zehra is used for Satan's seed and Eve's seed.

Just in case Christians bring up this verse from the bible to support that Cain was Adams son :

And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD. 2 And she again bare his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground. (Genesis 4:1-2)
Honestly, we can only say that one or more of them was Adam's, based strictly on this passage. there's a clue we should note before we move on. Upon delivering Cain, Eve declared that she had gotten a man with (Hebrew - 'eth) the Lord (Hebrew - Yehovah). If you research the name reference that is the Hebrew word Yehovah in all the surrounding context you find an interesting feature. Prior to Eve's declaration in Genesis 4:1 the word Yehovah is always followed by the word 'elohiym, forming "Lord God" - without exception. Eve's declaration marks a change. Why? Did she profane the name with reference to a lesser god? Well, that's something to think about.
Looking for way out of this wouldn't help Christians as the evidence provided above are sufficient to prove our point. Now that we've given hard evidence that Satan sexually deceived eve of the bible, let's introduce something else to this paper that will really tick Christians off.

According to the bible, the genealogy of Jesus has the bloodline of Cain who is the son of Satan. this would mean Jesus of the bible is from the line of Satan. Let's provide evidence from the very bible Christians claim is the absolute word of God.

the son of Jacob, the son of Isaac, the son of Abraham, the son of Terah, the son of N of Nahor, the son of Serug, the son of Reu, the son of Peleg, the son of Eber, the son of Shelah, the son of Cainan, the son of Arphaxad, the son of Shem, the son of Noah, the son of Lamech (Luke 3:34-36)
Did you catch the joke? Read the genealogy of Jesus carefully, amongst all the listed names we have one particular person named Cainan, the son of Arphaxad.

Cainan!!!! how did Cainan creep into the genealogy of Jesus?. If Cain was the father of Cainan then this would suggest that the bloodline of Satan came all the way down to Jesus which opens up a new can of worms.

More evidence from the bible suggest this to be true. Jesus of the bible could not have been the son of God as found in the book of Hebrews :

In the same way, Christ did not take on himself the glory of becoming a high priest. But God said to him, "You are my Son; today I have become your Father." (Hebrews 5:5)

Notice how Yahweh is saying today I have become your Father. why today if he always was his father? The same was said after Jesus was baptised in a variant reading codex bezae codex D. Why would Yahweh say to his son who was always with him today I have become your Father? This means he wasn't his son from the beginning, rather after he was baptized and cleansed he became his son is a metaphorical way not literal. Jesus was the son of satan and after being cleansed he became the son of Yahweh
This is another blow on Christians that their so called saviƓur is actually from the bloodline of Satan





Monday, 30 January 2017

Who saw the body get laid in the tomb?



Who followed Joseph of arimathea when he took the body of Jesus to the tomb (Mark 15 46)?. What makes you think the body could not have been switched with a stuffed linen clothing? Who even went inside the tomb and double checked the actual body none of the soldiers went inside and took a good look at the face and confirmed it was the actual person.

There is not evidence from the New Testament that the soldiers or scribes or Pharisees followed Joseph of arimathea all the way to the tomb?. There is no solid evidence the man on the cross known as Jesus actually gave up his ghost rather could have been put to sleep after drinking mixed fluid, or even unconscious (Mark 15:36).

Why did Nicodemus & Joseph of arimathea bring a large a amount of Aloes with them as Aloes is used to resuscitate and invigorate a person (John 19:39)

It's undeniable that the body of Jesus could have easily been switched by Joseph of arimathea on his way to this tomb since none of the enemies of Jesus followed him. This further explains why Jesus never showed himself to the Jews he challenged with the sign, he hid himself from them. Remember Jesus supposed to have said to the Jewish rabbis, scribe and Pharisee that no sign shall be given other then the sign of Jonah three days and three night? (Matthew 12:39-40). So why did he not show himself to the Jews, scribes and Pharisees and prove to them he resurrected.

Note in Matthew 26:65-66 the only version which says that the Jewish rabbis  were worried The body would be taken by his disciples, so they request Pilate to secure the tomb and so the Pilate sent guards to the tomb, but nowhere does Matthew say the guards actually went  inside the tomb and took a good look at the face and then sealed the tomb.

A new dilemma for Christians can you prove to us the body of Jesus was not switched by Joseph of arimathea on his way to the tomb! If there was no witness who saw the body of Jesus get laid in the tomb then the entire empty tomb can be easily explained..

There was no body in the tomb in the first place!!

Sunday, 29 January 2017

Are you Jesus's brother or mother ?



He replied (Jesus), "My mother and brothers are those who hear God's word and put it into practice." (Luke 8:21)



But he answered and said unto him that told him, Who is my mother? and who are my brethren?And he stretched forth his hand toward his disciples, and said, Behold my mother and my brethren!For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother. (Matthew 12:48-50)


---------------


Shall we conclude from the above saying if u hear gods words and put it into practice your either Jesus brother or mother?..... Is that literal brother and mother or metaphorical? Why not apply the similar saying to Mary Pbuh when she was called the sister of Aaron?  Isn't that double standards from from Christians!! We also read from genesis Abraham calling his nephew lot BROTHER!!


And when Abram heard that his brother lot was taken captive, he armed his trained servants, born in his own house, three hundred and eighteen, and pursued them unto Dan. (Genesis 14:14)


And he brought back all the goods, and also brought again his brother Lot, and his goods, and the women also, and the people. (Genesis 14:12)


So Abram said to Lot, "Please let there be no strife between you and me, nor between my herdsmen and your herdsmen, for we are brothers. (Genesis 13:8)

-----------------

Once again are the above passages metaphorical or literal you choose, let's be consistence and rational, we know they mean brothers and sisters mothers and fathers in faith and to finish off this absurd desperate attempt to attack Islam by Christians I would like to close this with a verse from the book of Luke 


In the time of Herod king of Judea, there was a priest named Zechariah, who belonged to the priestly division of Abijah, and whose wife Elizabeth was a daughter of Aaron.
(Luke 1:5)

Was she really the daughter of Aaron ? Or descendent now imagine if we start playing those pathetic games how will u react!!   


"I have become a brother to jackals And a companion of ostriches.
(Job 30:29)

Are the words Tawheed and Trinity found in scriptures (Argument busted)



Whenever Muslims have a dialogue with Christians regarding theology, and the topic of trinity comes up Christians normally find it very uneasy to discuss this very issues of trinity. Just for the records most Christians have no understanding of the trinity and generally dismiss it as a mystery!. 

Now coming back to the topic of Trinity. When Muslims ask Christians where in the bible is the word trinity mentioned?. Rather then responding to the question they normally divert and counter by asking where in the Quran dose it say Tawheed. Interestingly Christians have acknowledged the word trinity which is supposed to be a core  fundamental doctrine attributing to their God is not found any where in the bible? How absurd. In fact the closed to trinity which is doing in 1 John 5:7 is actually a later addition and wasn't originally mentioned. This further supports the claim that there is not absolute mention of trinity nor the concept of trinity is found anywhere in the bible so the question is why use the word TRINITY where is was unknown to Jesus and his disciples!. Now what does trinity mean where did it derive form? The etymology behind it would mean three which again fails to support what Jesus and his disciples believed in and that is ECHAD One True God.

The earliest record of trinity is mentioned by 2nd century theologian Tertullian,  R.E. Roberts writes :

"Tertullian was the first Christian writer to face a serious attack concerning the nature of God. In response, he outlined a formula summarising the Biblical teaching on this, and was the first to use the word trinitas in a technical way to describe the relation of God the Father, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit. The work is question is Adv. Praxean, but he also uses the term in De Pudicitia 2, and 21, and 25. He also was the first to use the word persona for the persons of the Trinity. However Tertullian's pioneering work in this area does not always avoid tending to make the Son subordinate to the Father, no doubt because the issue was not in his mind at the time. In Adv. Hermogenes 4 he makes a statement that there was a time when the Son did not exist, but the context again suggests that the statement is an inadvertence drawn forth by his argument about the appropriate titulature of the persons of the Trinity, rather than a doctrinal statement."
So from the above quotation we read that concept of trinity derived during the 2nd century by Tertullian, thus we can agree Jesus nor his disciples were aware of this triune god theory. An innovation introduced centuries later which is still being understood by Christian. 

-----------------------
Now let's bust this weak argument made by Christians regarding the word Tawheed. As mentioned above Christians who can't answer regarding the trinity and why it's not mentioned in the bible, tend to divert the question and ask Muslims here is Tawheed found in the Quran. Just for the records since we've proven that not only is the word trinity not in the entire bible even the concept of trinity is not found nor was this trinity even known or used by Jesus or his disciples. This goes to show that no such doctrine was even known or used till the 2nd century.

Coming to the word Tawheed one has to first establish where the word Tawheed derived from : 

Tawheed in Arabic means attributing Oneness to Allaah and describing Him as being One and Unique, with no partner or peer in His Essence and Attributes.  
The Arabs say waahid, ahad and waheed, all meaning one. Allaah is Waahid, meaning that He has no rivals or peers in any way. So Tawheed means knowing Allaah is One, with none like unto Him. Whoever does not acknowledge Allaah in these terms and does not describe Him as being One with no partner or associate does not believe in Tawheed. 
Tawheed means Monotheism that is believing in One True God who has no associates or partners. It's root word is Waahid, Ahad and Waheed 

This word (Tawheed) and its derivatives are used with this meaning in the Qur’aan and Sunnah. For example: 

“Say (O Muhammad): He is Allaah, (the) One [Ahad].Allaah‑us‑Samad [Allaah — the Self‑Sufficient Master, Whom all creatures need, (He neither eats nor drinks)].He begets not, nor was He begotten.And there is none co‑equal or comparable unto Him” (al-Ikhlaas 112:1-3)

“And your Ilaah (God) is One Ilaah [ilaahun waahidun] (God — Allaah), Laa Ilaaha illa Huwa (there is none who has the right to be worshipped but He), the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful” (al-Baqarah 2:163)

“Surely, disbelievers are those who said: ‘Allaah is the third of the three (in a Trinity).’ But there is no Ilaah (god) (none who has the right to be worshipped) but One Ilaah [ilaahun waahidun] (God —Allaah). And if they cease not from what they say, verily, a painful torment will befall on the disbelievers among them” (al-Maa'idah 5:73)

The above verses from the Quran we can read that the concept of Oneness is found in the Quran. And the word Tawheed has derived from It's root word Waahid, Ahad and Waheed. 

Did Prophet Muhammed  Pbuh and His Companions know about the word Tawheed and the Answer is Yes!. We have Sahih Hadiths where the word Taweed is Explicity Mentioned, which tells us  The Prophet Muhammed Pbuh and his Companions were well aware of the Word Taweed and this Word was used during the beginning of Islam. Let's cite a few hadiths to show Tawheed was a well known Word.

It was narrated from ‘Aishah and Abu Hurairah that when the Messenger of Allah (ļ·ŗ) wanted to offer a sacrifice, he brought two large, fat, horned, black-and-white, castrated rams. He slaughtered one on behalf of his nation, for whoever testified to Allah with monotheism (ŲØِالتَّوْŲ­ِيدِ )and that he had conveyed (the Message), and he slaughtered the other on behalf of Muhammad and the family of Muhammad (ļ·ŗ). ( Sunan Ibn Majah Vol 4 Book 26 Hadith 3122)

The Word Tawheed is used in Arabic ŲØِالتَّوْŲ­ِيدِ

“The Messenger of Allah came with two sheep both with big horns, then he reclined to one side and said: Bismillah wa Allahu Akbar, O Allah! Be with Muhammad and his family, then reclined to the other and said: Bismillah wa Allahu Akbar, O Allah! Be with Muhammad and his Ummah who testify/bear witness to you of/with TAWHEED and testify/bear witness to this statement/declaration. (Narrated by Jabir ibn Abdullah, collected by Ibn Hajr al-Asqalani, Matalib al-Aliya volume 3, page 32 (Hassan))

The Word Tawheed is used in Arabic ، ŲØŲ§Ł„ŲŖŁˆŲ­ŁŠŲÆ 

“Amr bin Shu`aib narrated from his father, who narrated from his grandfather that al-Aas bin Wa’il took an oath during the pre-Islamic times (Jahiliyyah) that he would slaughter one hundred goats and that Hisham bin al-`Aas slaughtered his share of 50 goats. Then `Amr bin al-`Aas asked the Prophet (P) about that, and he said, “As for your father, if he affirmed TAWHIDand you fast and give charity on his behalf, it would benefit him.”

أما أبوك ŁŁ„Łˆ ŁƒŲ§Ł† أقر ŲØŲ§Ł„ŲŖŁˆŲ­ŁŠŲÆ، فصمت ŁˆŲŖŲµŲÆŁ‚ŲŖ عنه نفعه Ų°Ł„Łƒ “. (Imam Ahmad narrated this, See silsilah saheeha (484))

(Just for the records Nabeel quraishi a Christian apologist said during his debate with Dr shabir Ally that nowhere in the Hadiths is the word Tawheed found?. Wonder if he would apologise to Dr Shabir Allay and his congregation for lying!
--------------------------

And there's many more Hadiths which Explicitly uses the word Tawheed for this paper these are sufficient. So let's us summarise this whole study: 

The Word Trinity nor the Concept  of Trinity is nowhere to be found in the Entire bible. The root word of Trinity is Three, even that's nowhere to be found in the Entire bible. Had the word Trinity have any sort of link to its root word which was often used then this could of have been used as evidence, but even that is lost. In short forget Trinity its root word Three is not even found which holds the Concept of a Triune God. The Earliest record of the usage of Trinity is by the 2nd century theologian Tertullian. There is no absolute evidence form them New Testament where Jesus or his disciples ever spoke about trinity let alone use the word. The word Trinity was coined up much later. So we can conclude Trinity nor the Concept of Trinity is found anywhere in the entire bible not even during the time of Jesus and his followers. 

On the other hand the Word Tawheed which is derived from the root  word Waahid, Ahad and Waheed is found in the Quran. The Original Word Ahad meaning One is found in the Quran in many places, which completely destroys the argument made by Christians. Put it this way if you were to ask Christians what does Tawheed mean they'll hesitate to answer as they know Tawheed means Monotheism, Oneness. If the Original Word is found in the Quran why are Christians chasing a word which comes from the Original?. Even if the word Tawheed is not found in the Quran it does not mean that the word Taweed was unknown to Prophet Muhammed Pbuh and His Companions. The Hadiths explicitly use the Arabic word Tawheed. This tells us the word Tawheed was known and used by Prophet Muhammed Pbuh and His Companions. So the original word is found in the Quran and the derived word Tawheed is found in Hadiths.

Once again Trinity  nor its concept is found anywhere in the bible. Whereas Tawheed and its root Original Word is found in the Quran and Hadiths.

So next time Christians use this baseless Argument show us where Tawheed is found in the Quran correct them!






ANSWER: 
Unification, Union, Combination, Fusion; Standadization, Regularization, Consolidation, Almagamation, Merger, Belief in the Unity of God.
Thats the meaning of Tawheed 

[Source: A Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic, by Han Wehr, edited by J.M Cowman, page 1055]

------------

Damaging? I think korede has to try harder than that. Im very sure Korede is aware of what he posted. "[Source: A Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic, by Han Wehr, edited by J.M Cowman, page 1055]"

Unity equalling to indivisible

 

indivisible

/ˌɪndɪˈvɪzɪbl/

adjective

 

1.     unable to be divided or separated.
"privilege was indivisible from responsibility"

  • (of a number) unable to be divided by another number exactly without leaving a remainder.


----------------------------

Notice what korede posted, "Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic" here's what wiki says
Although the monotheistic definition has persisted into modern Arabic, it is now more generally used to connote "unification, union, combination, fusion; standardization, regularization; consolidation, amalgamation, merger"

Note into modern Arabic not classical.

The classical definition of tawhid was limited to declaring or preferring belief in one God and the unity of God

According to Edward Lane's Lexicon on classical Arabic, tawhid is an infinite noun that means "He asserted, or declared, God to be one; he asserted, declared, or preferred belief in the unity of God" and is derived from the Arabic verb wahhada, which means "He made it one; or called it one"

(Lane, Edward (1863). Al-Qamus: An Arabic Lexicon. London: Williams and Norgate. pp. 2926–2928 (Vol.8.).


is the indivisible oneness concept of monotheism in Islam. (Oxfordislamicstudies.com.)

Whats more we have Sahih Hadith which specifically tell us what Tawheed means. There is a very long Hadith which supports the meaning of Tawheed from during the time of Prophet Muhammed Pbuh, which tells us the Tawheed was not an unknown word to them. The Prophet Pbuh and his Companions, knew and understood what Tawheed meant as we shall see from the Hadith. I'll only post a few lines from the Hadith as it’s a very long Hadith. Those who want to read the entire Hadith can check through the reference.


 I saw the same to his right and left, and behind him, and the Messenger of Allah (ļ·ŗ) was among us and Qur’an was being revealed to him, and he understood its meaning. Whatever he did, we did too. Then he began the Talbiyah of monotheism: “Labbaika Allahumma labbaik, labbaika la sharika laka labbaik. Innal-hamda wan-ni’mata laka wal-mulk, la sharika laka (Here I am, O Allah, here I am. Here I am, You have no partner, here I am. Verily all praise and blessings are Yours, and all sovereignty, You have no partner).” And the people repeated his words. And the Messenger of Allah (ļ·ŗ) approved of that. And the Messenger of Allah (ļ·ŗ) continued to recite the Talbiyah.’ Jabir said: ‘We did not intend (to do) anything but Hajj.  ( Sunan Ibn Majah  Chapters on Hajj Rituals Vol. 4, Book 25, Hadith 3074)

The Arabic reading of this Hadith, specially uses the word Tawheed.

and the Messenger of Allah (ļ·ŗ) was among us and Qur’an was being revealed to him, and he understood its meaning. Whatever he did, we did too. Then he began the Talbiyah of monotheism: “Labbaika Allahumma labbaik, labbaika la sharika laka labbaik. Innal-hamda wan-ni’mata laka wal-mulk, la sharika laka (Here I am, O Allah, here I am. Here I am, You have no partner, here I am. Verily all praise and blessings are Yours, and all sovereignty, You have no partner).”

Ų°َŁ„ِكَ وَŲ±َŲ³ُŁˆŁ„ُ اللَّهِ Ł€ صلى الله Ų¹Ł„ŁŠŁ‡ ŁˆŲ³Ł„Ł… Ł€ ŲØَيْنَ Ų£َŲøْهُŲ±ِنَŲ§ وَŲ¹َŁ„َيْهِ يَنْŲ²ِŁ„ُ Ų§Ł„ْŁ‚ُŲ±ْآنُ وَهُوَ يَŲ¹ْŲ±ِفُ ŲŖَŲ£ْوِŁŠŁ„َهُ Ł…َŲ§ Ų¹َŁ…ِŁ„َ Ł…ِنْ Ų“َىْŲ”ٍ Ų¹َŁ…ِŁ„ْنَŲ§ ŲØِهِ فَŲ£َهَŁ„َّ ŲØِالتَّوْŲ­ِيدِ ‏"‏ Ł„َŲØَّيْكَ اللَّهُŁ…َّ Ł„َŲØَّيْكَ Ł„َŲØَّيْكَ لاَ Ų“َŲ±ِيكَ Ł„َكَ Ł„َŲØَّيْكَ Ų„ِنَّ Ų§Ł„ْŲ­َŁ…ْŲÆَ وَالنِّŲ¹ْŁ…َŲ©َ Ł„َكَ وَŲ§Ł„ْŁ…ُŁ„ْكَ لاَ Ų“َŲ±ِيكَ Ł„َكَ ‏"‏ ‏.‏ وَŲ£َهَŁ„َّ النَّŲ§Ų³ُ ŲØِهَŲ°َŲ§ Ų§Ł„َّŲ°ِي يُهِŁ„ُّŁˆŁ†َ ŲØِهِ فَŁ„َŁ…ْ يَŲ±ُŲÆَّ Ų±َŲ³ُŁˆŁ„ُ اللَّهِ Ł€ صلى الله Ų¹Ł„ŁŠŁ‡ ŁˆŲ³Ł„Ł… Ł€ Ų¹َŁ„َيْهِŁ…ْ Ų“َيْŲ¦ًŲ§ Ł…ِنْهُ وَŁ„َŲ²ِŁ…َ Ų±َŲ³ُŁˆŁ„ُ اللَّهِ Ł€ صلى الله Ų¹Ł„ŁŠŁ‡ ŁˆŲ³Ł„Ł… Ł€ ŲŖَŁ„ْŲØِيَŲŖَهُ ‏.‏ Ł‚َŲ§Ł„َ Ų¬َŲ§ŲØِŲ±ٌ Ł„َŲ³ْنَŲ§ نَنْوِي Ų„ِلاَّ Ų§Ł„ْŲ­َŲ¬َّ

Notice the word is Tawheed (ŲØِالتَّوْŲ­ِيدِ) used, which was connected with the Talbiya.  And what is the Talbiya? 

 “Labbaika Allahumma labbaik, labbaika la sharika laka labbaik. Innal-hamda wan-ni’mata laka wal-mulk, la sharika laka (Here I am, O Allah, here I am. Here I am, You have no partner, here I am. Verily all praise and blessings are Yours, and all sovereignty, You have no partner).”

"You have no partner" (Tawheed ŲØِالتَّوْŲ­ِيدِ) confirmed by Hadith.  Korede forgets that there is no Muslim on the planet who denies the concept of Tawheed as meaning Oneness of God, associating no partners to God. What korede did was, use a modern Arabic  meaning of the word Tawheed dismissing what is the true meaning of Tawheed from the time of Prophet Muhammed Pbuh and till end of time and how it was understood by them.

Whats more, the Quran is clear God is One.  One wonders why Korede wants the word Tawheed found in the Quran when Tawheed means attributing Oneness to Allaah and describing Him as being One and Unique, with no partner or peer in His Essence and Attributes.  

Yet the Quran uses words which hold no ambiguous meaning, direct to the point.

“Say (O Muhammad): He is Allaah, (the) One [Ahad].2. AllaahusSamad [Allaah — the SelfSufficient Master, Whom all creatures need, (He neither eats nor drinks)].3. He begets not, nor was He begotten.4. And there is none coequal or comparable unto Him” (al-Ikhlaas 112:1-3) 
“And your Ilaah (God) is One Ilaah [ilaahun waahidun] (God — Allaah), Laa Ilaaha illa Huwa (there is none who has the right to be worshipped but He), the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful” (al-Baqarah 2:163)
“Surely, disbelievers are those who said: ‘Allaah is the third of the three (in a Trinity).’ But there is no Ilaah (god) (none who has the right to be worshipped) but One Ilaah [ilaahun waahidun] (God —Allaah). And if they cease not from what they say, verily, a painful torment will befall on the disbelievers among them” (al-Maa'idah 5:73) 

The oneness of Allah Swt is everywhere in the Quran. (Ahad, Waahidun, Wahid) the Quran is clear Allah Swt is One. Surah Iklas itself counters each and every Christian who say why is Taweed not found in the Quran. When Tawheed means Oneness, Allah Swt in the Quran is telling us he is One period.
The same cannot be said about Trinity, the concept of a triune God in the bible is so unclear and dubious, Christian centuries later had to coin up the word Trinity, whereas the Sahih Hadith are crystal clear Tawheed was used by Prophet Muhammed Pbuh and his Companions

For example, David Thomas states that verse 5:116 need not be seen as describing actually professed beliefs but rather as giving examples of shirk (claiming divinity for beings other than God) and a "warning against excessive devotion to Jesus and extravagant veneration of Mary, a reminder linked to the central theme of the Qur'an that there is only one God and He alone is to be worshipped." (David Thomas, Trinity, Encyclopedia of the Qur'an pp. 369-370)


Professor David Thomas comments on 5:116 as not to be taken as the literal understating Trinity, but rather as giving examples of shirk and a "warning against excessive devotion to Jesus & veneration of Mary, (David Thomas, Trinity, Encyclopedia of the Qur'an pp. 369-370)


Tawheed is from Wahadah, the root word Wahad: and it means uniqueness or oness

1.     Masdar – Ł…ŲµŲÆŲ± (Root).

2.     Mushtaq – Ł…Ų“ŲŖŁ‚ (Derived).

3.     Jaamid – Ų¬Ų§Ł…ŲÆ (Still or Frozen). Non derivative




Surah 9:31

They have taken as lords beside Allah their rabbis and their monks and the Messiah son of Mary, when they were bidden to worship only One God. There is no God save Him. Be He Glorified from all that they ascribe as partner (unto Him)! 

Ittakhathoo ahbarahum waruhbanahum arbaban min dooni Allahi waalmaseeha ibna maryama wama omiroo illa liyaAAbudoo ilahan wahidan la ilaha illa huwa subhanahu AAamma yushrikoona  

Anyone who knows basic Arabic will know that 'Messiah' (maseeh) in the verse above has a fat ha at the end of it, which is indicated by 'ha' being added to the word Maseeh. This indicates that it is the accusative (maf'ool bihi) of the verse. 

The verb in the verse is 'they have taken' (Ittakhathoo). Thus, the Messiah is the accusative of the verb, which means that the verse is saying that the Messiah was taken as a lord by those who also took their Rabbis and Priests as lords.
Surah 9:31



Also Surah Saba ayat 22


Surah 9:31



Trinity of Father, Mother, and Son. Church of Urshalling, Bavaria, Germany. 14th c. Holy Spirit Mother and Intersex Jesus: Turning Point Nicene Creed [Ally Kateusz] pp. 83















Wait! Jesus is the son of God & God. Mary is the daughter of God. The daughter of God gave birth to the son of God, making her the mother of God. Both share the same father making them brother & sister. Mary was conceived by the Holy Ghost who is a part of God?





Prophet Muhammad's Night Journey To Al-Masjid Al-Aqsa - The Farthest Mosque

  Prophet Mu h ammad's Night Journey To Al-Masjid Al-Aq s a - The Farthest Mosque Islamic Awareness © Islamic Awareness, All Rights Rese...