Friday, 23 September 2016

It only takes one verse to prove it is not the word of God

It only takes one verse to prove you wrong!


I find it fascinating when Christians force people to believe in the bible.  I mean they love Scrutinising all other scriptures except theirs. Think of it like this, your out in the street minding your own business out pops a roadside evangelist who starts attacking your faith (belief) in the most vulgar way. They only calm down when they preaches the bible enforcing it on us. HOW SICK!

Time we bust their bogus fallacious claim that the gospels are God inspired and the absolute truth. Let's examine if the gospels which Christians preach passes the test whether its from God or not.

In order to find out if a scripture is the actual word of God one has to read through the entire text and with an open mind and reason to understand if such text is sent by God. Everything will align with truth whether its historical or  scientific. if it is from God the very words i.e. written texts will be FREE FROM CORRUPTION, ERRORS, DISCREPANCIES etc.

-----------------------

In the case of the gospels one doesn't have to read the entire book to find such problems. We will focus on the first 4 books the supposed original gospels Mark, Matthew, Luke and John. The verse from each chapter of each book.



Imagine the very first verse of the first chapter proves its not the word of God
The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God; (Mark 1:1)
The first verse from the first book of the gospel has a added part to it. The Son of God is later added it's not originally found in the earliest manuscripts ( see footnotes for the NIV) it's clear this is a lie.

------------
This is the genealogy of Jesus the Messiah the son of David, the son of Abraham: (Matthew 1:1)
The first verse from the second book of the gospel has an absurd statement. Jesus the Messiah the son of David? How could this be possible when Jesus never had a father. Jesus's genealogy could no way connect with the line of David according to Jewish customs or even genetically. It's clear this is a lie.
--------------
Inasmuch as many have undertaken to compile a narrative of the things that have been accomplished among us, (Luke 1:1)
The first verse from the third book of the gospel, acknowledges that many more narratives have been written about Jesus. if we carry on reading and finish the statement of Luke ending at verse 4, we read Luke himself is saying his narrative of Jesus is far better then any other gospels written. this makes Mark, Luke and John's gospels unreliable, It's clear Luke was not inspired at all, he only did what others did write his own version.
---------------
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. (John 1:1)
The first verse from the forth gospel, a saying every bible basher preaches is probably the biggest deception John. This "formula" was first written by a Jewish philosopher by the name of Philo decades before John wrote his piece. John ripped off Philo otherwise known as plagiarism and made it into his own. This is a clear cut deception by John

Philo
"the Logos of the living God is the bond of everything, holding all things together and binding all the parts, and prevents them from being dissolved and separated."
Philo, De Profugis, cited in Gerald Friedlander, Hellenism and Christianity, P. Vallentine, 1912, pp. 114–115.


you can discredit the gospels Christians preach and bluntly tell them this is not from God

Jesus and Paul both spoke of jihad

Jesus uses the word Jihad in the Arabic bible !!
____________________________________





“Strive to enter through the narrow door. For many, I tell you, will seek to enter and will not be able. (Luke 13:24)


Notice from the above passage Jesus is saying (STRIVE TO ENTER) what's interesting about that word used by Jesus is in the Arabic text we read is as JIHAD?



24 «ابْذِلُوا الْجَهْدَ لِلدُّخُولِ مِنَ الْبَابِ الضَّيِّقِ، فَإِنِّي أَقُولُ لَكُمْ إِنَّ كَثِيرِينَ سَيَسْعَوْنَ إِلَى الدُّخُولِ، فَلاَ يَتَمَكَّنُونَ.

Arabic is read from right to left and pay attention on the second word starting from the right.. It says jahad ( الْجَهْدَ ) A word Jesus had no fear using.. Bear in mind the word pronounced in Arabic is jihad whether u say jahad, jahada or jihad..
It's meaning it's striving or struggling comes from the root word jahada 



----------------------------------------------------------------


How about this Matthew 10 verse 39
Whoever finds their life will lose it, and whoever loses their life for my sake will find it.

Jesus is sending his followers to jihad here, whosever loses their life for my sake??
How would some do that unless there in a battle or they get killed??


----------------------------------------------------------------


Paul says to go jannah fight for the truth 



Fight the good fight of the faith. Take hold of the eternal life to which you were called when you made your good confession in the presence of many witnesses.
(1 Timothy 6:12)



12 أَحْسِنِ الْجِهَادَ فِي مَعْرَكَةِ الإِيمَانِ الْجَمِيلَةِ. تَمَسَّكْ بِالْحَيَاةِ الأَبَدِيَّةِ، الَّتِي إِلَيْهَا قَدْ دُعِيتَ، وَقَدِ اعْتَرَفْتَ الاعْتِرَافَ الْحَسَنَ (بِالإِيمَانِ) أَمَامَ شُهُودٍ كَثِيرِينَ.


Above passage in Arabic we read Paul using the word Jihad ( الْجِهَادَ) 
We can see from the Arabic point of linguistic view striving-struggling / fighting is jihad, which Jesus and his apostle such as Paul used to express how important this is...

Now if Christians have a problem with this word Jihad please explain why the  Arabic bible used such a word especially from the lips of Jesus and Paul??

-------------

Sharia of Moses and Yahweh must be practiced without fail

 

Love the LORD your God and keep his requirements, his decrees, his laws (Sharia لشريعة ) and his commands always. (Deuteronomy 11:1)

 

(Deuteronomy 4:44 Arabic Bibleوهذه هي الشريعة التي وضعها موسى أمام بني اسرائيل.

 

This is the law (Shariah لشريعة ) Moses set before the Israelites. (Deuteronomy 4:44)

 

One of the Sharia لشريعة is to kill a disobedient child who curses his father or mother

 

Anyone who curses their father or mother is to be put to death. Because they have cursed their father or mother, their blood will be on their own head. (Leviticus 20:9)

 

This is sharia applicable now? And the answer is YES! Deuteronomy 11:1 is clear the Laws (Sharia لشريعة ) of Yahweh should be kept always "All your words are true; all your righteous laws are eternal." (Psalm 119:160)

 

"Your righteousness is everlasting and your law is true." (Psalm 119:142)



Jesus is not God ( 4 points to Destroy this claim)

God is not human, that he should lie, not a human being, that he should change his mind. Does he speak and then not act? Does he promise and not fulfil? (Numbers 23:19)

God is not a human, you can't get any more blatant than that. I want to focus on 4 points taken from the above verse and see if Jesus whom Christian’s worship fall in the category opdf a God.

 

(Point 1)  God is not human, that he should lie


(Point 2)  not a human being, that he should change his mind

 

(Points 3)  Does he speak and then not act

 

 (Point 4)  Does he promise and not fulfil

 

-----------------

 

Let's examine the gospels and use the above points to conclude if Jesus was a god.

 

(Point 1) Did Jesus lie?

 

Jesus lied to the High Priest after his arrest. John's Jesus told the High Priest that he taught openly and said nothing in secret, but this was a lie marks Jesus frequently told his followers not to tell anyone about his mission

 

Jesus answered him, I spake openly to the world; I ever taught in the synagogue, and in the temple, whither the Jews always resort; and in secret have I said nothing.

(John18:20)

 

Mark & Matthews Jesus 

 

And the disciples came, and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables? He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given. - Matthew 13:10-11 (see also Mark 4:11-12)

 

How about the statement below 

 

If you believe, you will receive whatever you ask for in prayer."

Matthew 21:21

 

 

“If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it.”

 (John 14:14)

 

 Probably the most untrue false prophecy in the bible. Till now not a single Christian has been able to support this passage!

 

-------------------------

 

 

(Point 2) did Jesus change his mind? 

 

Yes, Jesus did change his mind on many occasions according to the bible, below are a few examples striking off point 2

 

 These twelve Jesus sent out, instructing them, "Go nowhere among the Gentiles and enter no town of the Samaritans, but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel."(Matthew 10:5-6)

 

End of the gospel we read Jesus sending his disciples to the whole world a change of mind?

 

And Jesus came and said to them, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age."(Matthew 28:18-20)

 

How about this statement where Jesus at the crucial moment changes his mind

 

He said to them, "But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one. 

(Luke 22:36)

 

Compare to 

 

Then said Jesus unto him, Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword. (Matthew 26:52)

 

-------------------------

 

 

(Point 3) did Jesus speak and not act it?

 

Jesus spoke but never acted upon it [practiced what he preached]

 

But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. (Matthew 6:6) 

 

The above verse reads, Jesus telling his followers  pray alone in secret 

However, we find Jesus did not practice what he preached.

 

Then Jesus went with his disciples to a place called Gethsemane, and he said to them, “Sit here while I go over there and pray (Matthew 26:36)

 

Then he returned to his disciples and found them sleeping. "Couldn't you men keep watch with me for one hour?" he asked Peter. (Matthew 26:40)

 

 

Jesus warned his followers not to fear being killed 

(Luke 12:4)

 

John tells us Jesus feared for his life.

 

Jesus himself avoided the Jews for fear of being killed 

(John 7:1)

 

Point 3 busted.

 

-----------------------------------

 

(Point 4)  Did the words of Jesus fulfil?

 

The biggest biblical blunder

 

At his trial, he told the High Priest Caiaphas would see that he would 

see his coming in power:

 

"...Moreover, I tell you that from this time onward you will see the 

Son of Man seated at the right hand of Power and coming on the clouds 

of heaven."  (Matt. 26:64)

 

Caiaphas died, and Jesus' still has not arrived in power thousands of 

years later.  The penalty for false prophets is death.

 

 But this was not the only occasion that Jesus was a false prophet.  

In Matthew 24: 34 Jesus said "I tell you solemnly, before this 

generation has passed away all these things will have taken place" in 

reponse to his disciples question: "Tell us, when is this going to 

happen, and what will be the sign of your coming and of the end of the 

world?"

 

Mark 13:1-31 unfulfilled mark 14:62, Luke 21:17

 

 

Jesus did not return in his generation nor the dozens of generations 

that followed. Christians are well aware of that!

 

Conclusion 

 

The above 4 points have destroyed what Christians claim, it IS crystal-clear Jesus was a man not god

 

Ye men of Israel, hear these words; Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know (Acts 2:22)

 

--------------------------------

Bonus point

 

Mary the mother of Jesus confirmed Jesus was not God in any shape or form.

When his family heard what was happening, they tried to take him away. "He's out of his mind," they said. (Mark 3:21)

 

Notice how they said, “HE’S OUT OF HIS MIND” had Jesus been God, she would not have dared to utter such Blasphemy.  We know from Talmud Sanhedrin 55b, one uttering the name of God in vain is charged with blasphemy, if Mary had the slighted knowledge that Jesus was God, she would never dare to utter “he is out of his mind” being a devout Jewess.

 

Imagine Jesus of the Bible “out of his mind” can God be out of his mind, and the answer is no thus, Jesus is not God

-

 ----------------------------


Nowhere was Jesus ever called God, nor did he claim to be one , yet the very same bible is filled with other Prophets and men who were called God.

 

Moses was called a God.

 

Then the LORD said to Moses, "See, I make you as God to Pharaoh, and your brother Aaron shall be your prophet. (Exodus 7:1)

 

Aaron will be your spokesman to the people. He will be your mouthpiece, and you will stand in the place of God for him, telling him what to say. (Exodus 4:16)

 

Isaiah was called Lord.

 

Again the LORD (Isaiah) spoke to Ahaz (Isaiah 7:10)

 

People thought Herod was a God.

 

They shouted, "This is the voice of a god, not of a man." (Acts 12:22)

 

The Jews were called God's

 

"I said, 'You are "gods"; you are all sons of the Most High.' (Psalms 82:6)

 

Even Paul and Barnabas were called god's

 

When the crowds saw what Paul had done, they raised their voice, saying in the language of Lycaonia, “The gods have come down to us in the likeness of men!” They called Barnabas Zeus, and Paul they called Hermes, because he was the chief speaker. The priest of Zeus, whose temple was in front of the city, brought oxen and garlands to the gates, and would have made a sacrifice, joined by the multitudes." (Acts 14:11-13).

 

-------

 

Rabbi Akiva spoken by God to Moses

 

Rav Yehuda says that Rav says: When Moses ascended on High, he found the Holy One, Blessed be He, sitting and attaching crowns to the letters of the Torah. Moses said before G‑d: Master of the Universe, who is preventing You [from giving the Torah without these additions?] G‑d said to him: There is a man who is destined to be born after several generations, and Akiva ben Yosef is his name; from each and every point of these crowns, he is destined to derive heaps upon heaps of halachot. [It is for his sake that the crowns must be added to the letters of the Torah.]

 

Moses said before God: Master of the Universe, show him to me. God said to him: Return behind you. Moses went and sat at the end of the eighth row in Rabbi Akiva’s study hall and did not understand what they were saying. Moses’ strength waned, as he thought his Torah knowledge was deficient. When Rabbi Akiva arrived at the discussion of one matter, his students said to him: My teacher, from where do you derive this? Rabbi Akiva said to them: It is a halakha transmitted to Moses from Sinai. When Moses heard this, his mind was put at ease, as this too was part of the Torah that he was to receive. 

 

Moses returned and came before the Holy One, Blessed be He, and said before Him: Master of the Universe, You have a man as great as this and yet You still choose to give the Torah through me. Why? God said to him: Be silent; this intention arose before Me. Moses said before God: Master of the Universe, You have shown me Rabbi Akiva’s Torah, now show me his reward. God said to him: Return to where you were. Moses went back and saw that they were weighing Rabbi Akiva’s flesh in a butcher shop [bemakkulin], as Rabbi Akiva was tortured to death by the Romans. Moses said before Him: Master of the Universe, this is Torah and this is its reward? God said to him: Be silent; this intention arose before Me. (Talmud Menachod 29b)

 

Jesus said to keep the commandments Matthew 19:17. One of the Commandment is, “You shall not make yourself a graven image” (Exodus 20:4) According to the Talmudic commentary for Exodus 20:4 is, you shall not take any man as god. That’s exactly what Christians are doing.

 The Gemara explains: In a case where those to whom the inciter spoke subsequently worshiped him, everyone agrees that the inciter is liable, as it is written: “You shall not make yourself a graven image” (Exodus 20:4), which is interpreted to include a case where one establishes himself as a god. (Talmud Sanhedrin 61a)

 thus, one of the 10 commandment is, you shall not worship a man.



The Old Testament contains hundreds of names of unknown people. Take for example the book of Chronicles, the first 9 chapters alone contain names of people who bare no importance at all. Here’s the irony, Christians claim the name of Jesus is found in the Old Testament. Yet when we ask them where, they show us verses which are not explicit or clear unlike the Book of Chronicles, which is a laughable matter. How hard could it be?

 

It’s funny how Isaiah’s father Amoz is mentioned by name in the Old Testament, and this very same Isaiah didn’t mention Jesus’s name. Are you saying this man who you worship as God, forgot to add his name in his own Book?  Christians are the first to quote Isaiah 9-7-53 etc. but when we examine those unclear verses, we find nothing explicit.

Mans words mixed within scriptures ?


Mans words mixed with God?



Formerly, in Israel, when a man went to inquire of God, he would say thus, "Come and let us go to the seer," for he who is called a prophet today, was formerly called a seer. (1 Samuel 9:9)

----------------------------------------------

Scholars of the bible agree the author inserted his own words, and wrote it as its part of inspired text!



( Bible Rashis commentary )

Formerly in Israel: The author wrote this. This is not part of the statement of Saul’s servant.

----------------------------------------------

Pulpit commentary 

Verse 9. - Beforetime, etc. This verse is evidently a gloss, written originally by some later hand in the margin, in order to explain the word used for seer in vers. 11, 18, 19. 


How can you call this the word of god when the authors written info has become part of the bible.??  Even if it's one word that's sufficient to reject the entire book as mans handy work has started to play with it... Above pulpits commentary is telling us how a later hand got involved?

Thank to commentaries and extensive studies by scholars we can differentiate them.... Christians however never look into commentaries or scholary work they only interpret the bible thinking they know....  

This brings into mind Jeremiah 8:8

"'How can you say, "We are wise, for we have the law of the LORD," when actually the lying pen of the scribes has handled it falsely?

Was Jesus of the bible a sinner?

According to john Jesus sinned against God.



Let's study the verse with cross reference, and read how Jesus testified he sinned


------------------------------------------------------------------------

"I am not referring to all of you; I know those I have chosen. But this is to fulfill this passage of Scripture: 'He who shared my bread has turned against me.'
(John 13:18)


The passage above tells us a prophecy was made which was fulfilled how Jesus was going to be betrayed, but the question is where in the OT is that prophecy mentioned?...... It's in the book of psalm


Even my close friend, someone I trusted, one who shared my bread, has turned against me. (Psalm 41:9)


Ok We have to admit john has truly stated about the prophecy which really happened, Jesus was betrayed right. Well if that's really the case then let's read psalm 41:4?


I said, "Have mercy on me, LORD; heal me, for I have sinned against you."
(Psalm 41:4)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------


WHAT!!! If john truly stated verse 9 talks about the prophecy Jesus will be betrayed, here in verse 4 Jesus says he sinned against God?,
And I tell you if you read from chapter 41 verse 1 onwards it's about the same person!! Unless John lied, which makes the gospels false.
You can't have the cake and eat it lol.

Isn't this enough to say Jesus was a sinner according to john!







Sorry wrong number there is no 666 !!


Sorry Wrong Number not 666 but 616 


This calls for wisdom. Let the person who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. That number is 666. (Revelations 13:18)
----------------


Christians for centuries have been quoting the number 666 referring to the beast (antichrist) missionaries have gone as far as attributing it to Islam... But little were they aware that the earliest fragment from the book of revelation P115 Manuscripts reads the number 616 and not 666!!!

The number 666 for the Beast has led to many speculations about who this could character be. Scholars now believe that it is related to ancient Greek ideas about numerology. The letters of a name were ascribed numerical value and added up to give a number; in the case of 666, it is the name of Emperor Nero that adds up to that number. Historians believe that Nero's persecution of Christians in Rome made him a bête noire among the early Christians. 
But what about the number 616 for the Beast? Working on the principles of numerology, scholars work out 616 indicates the Emperor Caligula, Nero's predecessor. Caligula had had a statue of himself erected in the Temple, the Holiest of the Holies, in Jerusalem which had greatly offended Jews. If the alleged author of Revelation was indeed "John" and a Jew from Palestine, he would have known this.
It should be added that even the number 665 had been ascribed to the Beast in the Book of Revelation. Also, the significance of the number 616 was known to Irenaeus in the second century.

WHAT A SHAME THEY FOLLOW NOTHING BUT CONJECTURE!! ANOTHER LIE EXPOSED FROM THE EARLIEST MANUSCRIPT!

The original language of the Gospel

We're the gospels before and during the time of Islam in Arabia written in Greek or Hebrew?

It's well known the current New Testament which Christians have now was written in koine Greek, according to Christians that the original language the gospels were written in not the language of Jesus who spoke Aramaic/ Hebrew. Now Christians brag they have the original copies of the gospels, but the question is were people all over the world who had access to the gospels reading from the same Greek? and the answer it now. In Fact in Arabia  before And  after Islam the gospels were in Hebrew not Greek or Arabic, the first Arabic gospels were written in 897 CE

-------------------

Constance E Padwick in his article "al-Ghazali & The Arabic Versions Of The Gospels: An Unsolved Problem" mentions this perplexity even though he shows evidence of the earliest Gospel in Arabic dated around 897 CE, a few years before al-Ghazali
Sidney H Griffith has done extensive research on the appearance of Arabic Gospel. Regarding the manuscript evidence, he says:

The oldest, dated manuscript containing the Gospels in Arabic is Sinai Arabic MS 72. Here the text of the four canonical Gospels is marked off according to the lessons of the temporal cycle of the Greek liturgical calendar of the Jerusalem Church. A colophon informs us that the MS was written by Stephen of Ramleh in the year 284 of the Arabs, i.e., 897 AD.

Note from the above the gospels were written  200 years after Islam came, let's find out what translation of the gospel were the people or pre Islam reading.

According to Mike licona a New Testament scholar said the gospel of mathhew was initially written in Aramaic/Hebrew not in Greek? He also said that it's possible Matthew was the first to write not mark which means the first written gospel would have been in Aramaic/Hebrew not Greek.

We know from Hadith the uncle of Khajida (May Allah Swt Be Please with her ) the wife of Prophet Muhammed Pbuh, used to write the gospel in Hebrew :

.. Khadija then accompanied him to her cousin Waraqa bin Naufal bin Asad bin 'Abdul 'Uzza, who, during the pre-Islamic Period became a Christian and used to write the writing with Hebrew letters. He would write from the Gospel in Hebrew as much as Allah wished him to write...  (Bhukari vol 1 book 1 Hadith 3)


Volume 4, Book 55, Number 605 :
Narrated by 'Aisha
The Prophet returned to Khadija while his heart was beating rapidly. She took him to Waraqa bin Naufal who was a Christian convert and used to read the Gospels in Arabic Waraqa asked (the Prophet), "What do you see?" When he told him, Waraqa said, "That is the same angel whom Allah sent to the Prophet) Moses. Should I live till you receive the Divine Message, I will support you strongly."


We can clearly see that the Arabs would have read the Hebrew gospels translated in Arabic not from the Greek, but there's more 

 -----------------------

We are told in another Hadith that Zaid bin Thabit (RA) learned Hebrew. 

Narrated Zaid bin Thabit (RA) relates: "The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) instructed me to learn the language of the Jews and said :  "by Allah! I cannot trust the Jews with our book.'" Half a month did not pass before I mastered it for him. Having learnt it,  whenever the Prophet wrote a letter to the Jews I would write it  in Hebrew) for him and if they wrote a letter to him I would read it to him. (Jami' al-Trimidhi, Hadith 2715)

From the above Hadith we can read that Zaid bin Thabit (RA) learnt the Hebrew language, did you notice there is no mention of Greek? Did the Arab Christians read the Greek texts or in Hebrew the hadiths are clear they were in Hebrew..

----------------------

How about the verse found in the bible during the time of Prophet Muhammed Pbuh. They are not found in the bible Christians have now. The hadiths below  will prove the Torah has been changed, and they don't have the original scriptures as we find it referenced in accordance to the Sahih Hadiths:

---------------------------------------------------




Narrated by Al Fultaan ibn A'asim:
 
Do you bear witness that I am the Messenger of Allah? He said: No. The Prophet peace be upon him said: Do you read the Torah? He replied back: Yes. Then the Prophet peace be upon him asked: and the Gospel? The man replied: Yes. The Prophet peace be upon him then asked: The Qur'an? The man replied back: No. The Prophet peace be upon him replied back: By He Whose Hand my soul lies, if I willed I would read it. Then the Prophet peace be upon him pulled the man and asked: Don't you find me in the Torah and Gospel? The man replied back and said: We find someone who is similar to you and your Ummah (community) and from the place where you were brought up and we were hoping that you would be from amongst us. When you rose up (as a Prophet) we were afraid that it would be you. However, we looked and saw that it wasn't you. The Prophet peace be upon him replied back asking: Why is that? The man said: From him will be 70,000 of his followers from his community who will have no judgment passed on them nor punishment but you have a simple number of men following you. The Prophet peace be upon him replied back: By He Whose Hand my soul lies it is me and it is referring to my Ummah (community). And they are more than 70 thousand, 70 thousand, 70 thousand. (This hadith has been declared authentic by Sheikh Albani in Saheeh Al Muwaarid, page or hadith no. 1765)  
 
Note how the man informed the Prophet (peace be upon him) that one of the signs of the Prophet to come according to the Torah or Gospel is that the Prophet will have 70,000 followers who will enter paradise with no judgment passed on them. Where do we see this in today's Torah or Gospel? The answer is: Nowhere! Thus, indicating that it has been removed from the text, which in turn implies textual corruption.  

---------------------------------------------------


Abdullah ibn Mas'ud is reported to have said:


 
"While a person is in his grave, The first place to start with punishment is his feet yet his feet prevent this punishment from happening by saying: "You cannot punish me in anyway as this man always recited Sura Al-Mulk". Thus, it (the punishment) approaches him from his chest (stomach) side yet his chest prevents the punishments from happening by saying: "You cannot harm or punish me as this man always recited Sura Al-Mulk." Then the punishment of the grave turns to his head but his head prevents this punishment from happening and says: "You cannot punish me because this man always recited Sura Al-Mulk." This Sura is indeed called the preventer that prevents the occurrence of punishment. It is stated in Torah that whoever recites Surah Al Mulk at night, he would be doing very good acts. (Hadith scholar, Al Munthiri declares this narration to be saheeh (authentic) or hasan (good) in his book Al Targheeb Wal Tarheeb, Volume 2, p. 320. Sheikh Albani also affirms the authenticity of this narration in Saheeh Al Targheeb, hadith no. 1475)
 
Here Abdullah ibn Mas'ud is saying that the Torah says that whoever recites Sura Al Mulk (Surah 67), it will protect him from the punishment of the grave. I and everyone reading this article know very well that nowhere is this found in today's Torah. It means that it was removed, thus indicating textual corruption. 

---------------------------------------------------

Let us read the following narration:

 


The Jews brought [to the Prophet peace be upon him] a man and a woman among them who committed adultery. The Prophet peace be upon him said, "Bring the two most knowledgeable men from amongst you."  The Jews brought the two sons of Suriyya, and the Prophet peace be upon him asked them, "What punishment do you find in the Torah regarding these two?" They said, "In the Torah, we find that if four men testify that they saw his male organ in her womb, similar to when the eyeliner is inserted inside the eyeliner container; in this case they are stoned."  The Prophet peace be upon him said, "What made you stop stoning?" They said, "Our kingship (meaning Jewish) was taken from us and we hated killing." The Messenger of Allah asked for four witnesses and they brought four men who testified that they saw his penis in her womb like the eyeliner is inserted in the eyeliner container. The Messenger of Allah ordered that the two [adulterers] are stoned. (Sunan Abu Dawud, Hadith no. 3862, Source. Sheikh Albani declared this hadith authentic in Sunan Abu Dawud, hadith no.4452)
 
Indeed, we do find in the Old Testament today that adulterers are to be killed (Leviticus 20:10). But nowhere do we find anything about four witnesses (interestingly Islam teaches this) or any eyeliner.

This is indirect proof that this section of the Torah has been distorted with.

 ---------------------------------------------------

The following narration tells us about a conversation that Umar ibn Al Khattab once had with a Jew:

 
Sa'eed ibn Al Museeb narrated that it happened that a Muslim and a Jew had a dispute so they went to Umar bin Al-Khattab to judge between them. Umar bin Al-khattab ruled in favor for the Jew, which upon the Jew said: "I swear by Allah, you have judged with the Truth". Umar bin Al-khattab hit the man with a stick that has a small ball on the top of it when he heard him saying that. Then Umar bin Al-khattab asked the Jew, "How do you know that I judged with the truth?" The Jew replied, "We find in the Torah that whoever judges according to the truth two angels from his right and left sides assist him to find the truth. Yet, if he went astray from the truth, they will leave him. (Al Munzhiri declared this narration to be authentic in Al Targheeb Wal Tarheeb, Volume 3, p. 188)

The Jew spoke about the two angels on the sides of the human being. Where is this to be found in today's Torah? It is not. This means it was removed. Thus indicating textual corruption.  


---------------------------------------------------

The following narration says the story of how Abdullah ibn Salam accepted Islam:
 
Saheeh Bukhari
 
Volume 6, Book 60, Number 7:

'Abdullah bin Salam heard the news of the arrival of Allah's Apostle (at Medina) while he was on a farm collecting its fruits. So he came to the Prophet and said, 'I will ask you about three things which nobody knows unless he be a prophet. Firstly, what is the first portent of the Hour? What is the first meal of the people of Paradise? And what makes a baby look like its father or mother?'. The Prophet said, 'Just now Gabriel has informed me about that.'
 
'Abdullah said, 'Gabriel?' The Prophet said, 'Yes.' 'Abdullah said, 'He, among the angels is the enemy of the Jews.' On that the Prophet recited this Holy Verse:-- 'Whoever is an enemy to Gabriel (let him die in his fury!) for he has brought it (i.e. Qur'an) down to your heart by Allah's permission.' (2.97) Then he added, 'As for the first portent of the Hour, it will be a fire that will collect the people from the East to West. And as for the first meal of the people of Paradise, it will be the caudite (i.e. extra) lobe of the fish liver. And if a man's discharge proceeded that of the woman, then the child resembles the father, and if the woman's discharge proceeded that of the man, then the child resembles the mother.'  
 
Now Abdullah ibn Salam was learned of the Torah and was convinced of the Prophethood of Muhammad peace be upon him after receiving the answers to those questions. Surely, Abdullah ibn Salam would only have known this from the Torah since he did not follow any other divine book. However, we don't find the answers that the Prophet peace be upon him gave to Abdullah ibn Salam in the Bible today. Therefore, it must have been removed, thus indicating textual corruption.


So here we saw several examples of what Muslims back in the Prophet's (peace be upon him) time would refer to as "Torah" and it wasn't the Old Testament.


All the above is sufficient to knock down any Christians who claim they have the original scriptures!!!!!!!!


What a Shame 




 

Prophet Muhammad's Night Journey To Al-Masjid Al-Aqsa - The Farthest Mosque

  Prophet Mu h ammad's Night Journey To Al-Masjid Al-Aq s a - The Farthest Mosque Islamic Awareness © Islamic Awareness, All Rights Rese...