Christians and their Epic failure!

Once again Christians have failed in both ways Biblically and Islamically you may wonder how? Well, after reading this paper you'll be convinced Christians have failed ridiculously.

There are certain tests given to prove the authenticity of scriptures and believers, we find them in both Quran and Bible. Below we will prove how Christians throughout time have failed this test.

----------------------------

And these signs will accompany those who believe: In my name they will drive out demons; they will speak in new TONGUES ;they will pick up snakes with their hands; and when they drink deadly POISON, it will not hurt them at all; they will place their hands on sick people, and they will get well." (Mark 16:17-18)

From the above passage we get a strong description on how a believer would be recognised by his or her faith in Christ.  We read, that they will speak in different Tongues, and drink  deadly poison which will not harm them. Let's take the "POSION" statement for now and get back to the different TONGUES for our next test. Hoe many Christians have drank deadly poison and lived?  The answer is NONE! Not a single Christian has passed this test.  Go ahead give them a bottle of poison and see if they would drink it.

Now the next Test

----------------------

Say: "If the mankind and the jinns were together to produce the like of this Qur'an, they could not produce the like thereof, even if they helped one another."  [Qur'an 17:88]

And if you (Arab pagans, Jews, and Christians) are in doubt concerning that which We have sent down (i.e. the Qur'an) to Our slave (Muhammad Peace be upon him ), then produce a surah (chapter) of the like thereof and call your witnesses (supporters and helpers) besides Allah, if you are truthful.  [Qur'an 2:23]

And this Qur'an is not such as could ever be produced by other than Allah (Lord of the heavens and the earth), but it is a confirmation of (the revelation) which was before it [i.e. the Taurat (Torah), and the Injeel (Gospel), etc.], and a full explanation of the Book (i.e. laws and orders, etc, decreed for mankind) - wherein there is no doubt from the the Lord of the 'Alamin (mankind, jinns,and all that exists).

Or do they say: "He (Muhammad(P)) has forged it?" Say: "Bring then a surah (chapter) like unto it, and call upon whomsoever you can, besides Allah, if you are truthful!" [Qur'an 10:37-38]

Or they say, "He (Prophet Muhammad(P)) forged it (the Qur'an)." Say: "Bring you then ten forged surah (chapters) like unto it, and call whomsoever you can, other than Allah (to your help), if you speak the truth!" [Qur'an 11:13]

Or do they say: "He (Muhammad(P)) has forged it (this Qur'an)?" Nay! They believe not! Let them then produce a recital like unto it (the Qur'an) if they are truthful. [Qur'an 52:33-34]

---------------

Abdur Rahim Green mentions that:

These are the sixteen al-Bihar (literally "The Seas", so called because of the way the poem moves, according to its rhythmic patterns): at-Tawil, al-Bassit, al-Wafir, al-Kamil, ar-Rajs, al-Khafif, al-Hazaj, al-Muttakarib, al-Munsarih, al-Muktatab, al-Muktadarak, al-Madid, al-Mujtath, al-Ramel, al-Khabab and as-Saria'. So the challenge is to produce in Arabic, three lines, that do not fall into one of these sixteen Bihar, that is not rhyming prose, nor like the speech of soothsayers, and not normal speech, that it should contain at least a comprehensible meaning and rhetoric, i.e. not gobbledygook. Now I think at least the Christian's "Holy spirit" that makes you talk in tongues, part of your "Tri-Unity" of God should be able to inspire one of you with that!

To begin with; the Arabic language and Arab speech are divided into two branches. One of them is rhymed poetry. It is a speech with metre and rhyme, which means every line of it ends upon a definite letter, which is called the 'rhyme'. This rhymed poetry is again divided into metres or what is called as al-Bihar, literally meaning 'The Seas'. This is so called because of the way the poetry moves according to the rhythmic patterns. There are sixteen al-Bihar viz; at-Tawil, al-Bassit, al-Wafir, al-Kamil, ar-Rajs, al-Khafif, al-Hazaj, al-Muttakarib, al-Munsarih, al-Muktatab, al-Muktadarak, al-Madid, al-Mujtath, al-Ramel, al-Khabab and as-Saria'. Each one rhymes differently. For metres of Arabic poetry please see please see Lyall's book Translations Of Ancient Arabian Poetry, Chiefly Pre-Islamic.[1] He discusses al-Kamil, al-Wafir, al-Hajaz, at-Tawil, al-Bassit, al-Khafif and al-Madid briefly.[2]

The other branch of Arabic speech is prose, that is non-metrical speech. The prose may be a rhymed prose. Rhymed prose consists of cola ending on the same rhyme throughout, or of sentences rhymed in pairs. This is called "rhymed prose" or sajc. Prose may also be straight prose (mursal). In straight prose, the speech goes on and is not divided in cola, but is continued straight through without any divisions, either of rhyme or of anything else. Prose is employed in sermons and prayers and in speeches intended to encourage or frighten the masses.[3] One of the most famous speeches involving sajc is that of Hajjaj bin Yusuf in his first deputation in Iraq in post-Islamic and Quss bin Sa'idah in pre-Islamic times.

So, the challenge, as cAbdur Rahim Green mentions, is to produce in Arabic , three lines, that do not fall into one of these sixteen al-Bihar, that is not rhyming prose, nor like the speech of soothsayers, and not normal speech, that it should contain at least a comprehensible meaning and rhetoric, i.e. not gobbledygook. Indeed

The Qur'an is not verse, but it is rhythmic. The rhythm of some verses resemble the regularity of sajc, and both are rhymed, while some verses have a similarity to Rajaz in its vigour and rapidity. But it was recognized by Quraysh critics to belong to neither one nor the other category.[4]

Above information taken from https://www.islamic-awareness.org/quran/miracle/ijaz.html

--------------------

That's enough proof to bust any Christians claiming to have the HOLY SPIRIT. not a single Christian or Human being on earth has been able to Produce a Quran like it. Nor have they been able to drink POSION? What's going on, why doesn't your DIFFERENT TONGUES HELP YOU WITH ARABIC? Unless Christians say Mark 16:9-20 is a Later Addition as David Wood stated, which means u have a Book which contains fabricated lies and is not the word of God.

You can't have the cake and eat it


---------------------

And these signs will accompany those who believe: In my name they will drive out demons; they will speak in new tongues; they will pick up snakes with their hands; and when they drink deadly poison, it will not hurt them at all; they will place their hands on sick people, and they will get well." (Mark 16:17-18)

The debate between Sheikh Asrar Rashid and his two interlocutors, Caleb and Hatun proved Christians are not believers. Sheikh Asrar gave both Christians three challenges and none were taken up by them. Though i'm not in the favour with what Sheikh Asrar did by drinking poison, it only showed he qualified to be true believer biblically.

Christians try to snake their way out by saying, the verse dose not say Christian should drink poison, rather if they had been poisoned by someone else then it won't affect them. Yet the text reads

"and when they drink deadly poison, it will not hurt them at all"

WHEN THEY DRINK, NOT IF SOMEONE ELSE POISONS YOU. WHATS WORSE, THE STARTING OF THE VERSE STATES IN MY NAME. IN OTHER WORDS, YOU WOULD KNOWINGLY DRINK POISON BY SAYING THE NAME OF JESUS, NOT THAT YOU WILL BE UNAWARE WHO GAVE YOU POISON.

The best way to get out of this is to admit it's a later addition and never was there in the first place. this would only make it worse talk about catch 22.

If Christians are unable to drink poison and heal the sick like Sheikh challenged Caleb to heal a blind brother on stage, why are they even Christians?

Don't be a Christian and embarrass yourself any longer