When one studies the Hebrew and Greek scriptures, it becomes clear that omnipotent and omniscient God did make mistakes and repented. This means that the God did not know his own actions and the outcomes of the actions. Now for some fine examples. Let us first start with Old Testament. In the story of Noah(P), it is mention that:
And the LORD smelled a sweet savour; and the LORD said in his heart, I will not again curse the ground anymore for man's sake; for the imagination of man's heart is evil from his youth; neither will I again smite any more everything living, as I have done. [Genesis 8:21]
And in the story of Moses(P), we read
And the LORD repented of the evil which he thought to do unto his people. [Exodus 32:14]
Oh no! that is Old Testament, cries the Christian. The New Testament has replaced all that. Yes, in the New Testament, the monotheistic and henotheistic God of Israel, Yahweh, suddenly starts to be interpreted as Trinity. So, the concept of monotheistic and henotheistic God itself got abrogated in the New Testament as the Christians allege! So we have to assume that the monotheistic and henotheistic God of Israel did not know that he was Trinity and made a serious mistake or he simply changed his mind or in the worst case scenario, he cheated the People of Israel.
The problem just does not end here. Let us also see what are the problems of the Christian cry; The New Testament has replaced all that. The following essay is intended to show evidence of the concept of abrogation in the Bible both between the Hebrew Scriptures (Old Testament) and Greek Scriptures (New Testament) as well as internally in the Greek Scriptures themselves.
To begin - what is meant by the term "abrogation"? The Concise Oxford Dictionary defines the word Abrogate as:
ab-ro-gate: v.tr. repeal, annul, abolish (a law or custom).
In the context of the will and law of God (Holy is He above all that is attributed to Him) as expressed in Scripture, it refers to the nullification of an older Law or concept in favour of a newer and more appropriate one.
We might ask whether an omniscient God, if He is the one who sent Torah and Injeel, might employ such a concept as abrogation? Surely an all-knowing God would be able to impart His will in entirety without recourse to change? Doesn't the idea of abrogating, or nullifying, a previous law in light of a better one suggest that the Author is not all-knowing?
What these questions don't take into account, is that whilst God is all-knowing, unchanging (e.g., Malachi 3:6, with lots of problems with the concept of Trinity), His audience, humanity, is not. The very concept that Christianity holds so dear, of the difference between the old covenantal relationship of law, as opposed to the new covenantal relationship of grace relies on the understanding that human beings as individuals and in human societies are in fact subjected to change in condition.
According to Matthew, Jesus(P) said:
"Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. Anyone who breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. (Matthew 5:17-19)
And surprising, Jesus(P), the omniscient Yahweh incarnate (allegedly!) suddenly had to change the Laws of Divorce, Justice and Oaths apart from changing his own mind!
Abrogation Of Divorce
The best examples of Jesus(P) abrogating parts of Old Testament law concern a number of statements recorded in the gospel according to Matthew. The most prominent of them would be the Law concerning Divorce.
In the Old Testament we find the following law concerning divorce:
If a man marries a woman who becomes displeasing to him because he finds something indecent about her, and he writes her a certificate of divorce, gives it to her and sends her from his house, and if after she leaves his house she becomes the wife of another man, (Deutronomy 24:1-2)
Now without going into the minute of this particular law of divorce, one thing becomes immediately clear. Not only is divorce permitted by God, it is legal for her to remarry.
However in the time of Jesus(P), the rules of divorce seem to have taken a U-turn.
"It has been said, 'Anyone who divorces his wife must give her a certificate of divorce.' But I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for marital unfaithfulness, causes her to become an adulteress, and anyone who marries the divorced woman commits adultery. (Matthew 5:31-32)
Here Jesus(P) abrogated the former permission to divorce according to the husband's displeasure and strictly allowed it under one condition - adultery. He even went so far as to legislate that divorcees were not permitted to remarry, clearly abrogating the former permission. But what is the reason given for this abrogation? Had God changed His mind? Is this evidence of God not being omniscient? Or more importantly, is this evidence that in fact God was never the author of these laws? Well Jesus(P) himself explains:
"Why then," they asked, "did Moses command that a man give his wife a certificate of divorce and send her away?" Jesus replied, "Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. But it was not this way from the beginning. I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for marital unfaithfulness, and marries another woman commits adultery." (Matthew 19:7-9)
Jesus(P) points to the fact that God designs laws that are suitable to the needs and exigencies of the time and audience.
Law Of Absolute Justice
In the Hebrew Scriptures it is written:
Show no pity: life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot. (Deutronomy 19:21)
Quite a harsh law of absolute justice that was necessary due to the conditions of Moses'(P) age. But Jesus(P) was inspired by God to reveal a softer code for the believers to practice in individual relationships. By abrogating the harshness of absolute justice, Jesus(P) was inspired to encourage the believers to employ forgiveness and mercy. It is recorded he said:
"You have heard that it was said, 'Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.' But I tell you, Do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well. If someone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles. Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you. (Matthew 5:38-42)
It is a different story that many Christians do not practice what Jesus(P) has told them to do.
Law Of Oaths
We read:
If you make a vow to the LORD your God, do not be slow to pay it, for the LORD your God will certainly demand it of you and you will be guilty of sin. But if you refrain from making a vow, you will not be guilty. Whatever your lips utter you must be sure to do, because you made your vow freely to the LORD your God with your own mouth. (Deutronomy 23:21-23)
That is, it is permissible to make an oath for various reasons, however, the swearer must fulfil the oath he makes. In Jesus' time it became necessary for him to abrogate this permission so that the swearing of oaths became forbidden. In Matthew it is recorded:
"Again, you have heard that it was said to the people long ago, `Do not break your oath, but keep the oaths you have made to the Lord.' But I tell you, Do not swear at all: either by heaven, for it is God's throne; or by the earth, for it is his footstool; or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the Great King. And do not swear by your head, for you cannot make even one hair white or black. Simply let your `Yes' be `Yes,' and your `No,' `No'; anything beyond this comes from the evil one. (Matthew 5:33-37)
Jesus(P) Abrogating His Own Commandments
Perhaps the clearest example of God inspiring Jesus(P) to practice abrogation can be seen in the commissioning of his disciples. It is written in the New Testament that initially Jesus(P) forbade his disciples from preaching to non-Jews. He restricted their activities and commanded them to avoid Gentiles. However, due to the change in circumstances and the completion of his earthly mission, Jesus(P) abrogated this earlier law and made it not only permissible but obligatory for his disciples to reach out to a broader base.
A nice example of Jesus(P) asking his disciples to preach the lost sheep of Israel is:
These twelve Jesus sent out with the following instructions: "Do not go among the Gentiles or enter any town of the Samaritans. Go rather to the lost sheep of Israel. (Matthew 10:5-6)
This prohibition is reinforced by Jesus'(P) own practice:
A Canaanite woman from that vicinity came to him, crying out, "Lord, Son of David, have mercy on me! My daughter is suffering terribly from demon-possession." Jesus did not answer a word. So his disciples came to him and urged him, "Send her away, for she keeps crying out after us." He answered, "I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel." (Matthew 15:22-24)
Even though because of his mercy Jesus(P) healed the sick daughter, he made it clear that his mission was to the Jews, not to the Gentiles. Later on this was abrogated and Jesus(P) commanded his disciples to reach out to all peoples. It is recorded he said:
Then Jesus came to them and said, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age." (Matthew 28:18-20
The “Laws of Old”
that Jesus abrogated are:
- The Law of Killing
- The Law of Adultery
- The Law of Oaths and Swearing
- The Law of Revenge
- The Law of Hate
- The Law of Divorce
- The Law of Showing no Mercy
Here are some
examples of abrogated laws from the chapter that is supposed to substantiate
that the Mosaic Law was not done away with:
The
Law of Divorce:
The Mosaic Law:
“It hath been said,
whosoever shall put away his wife, let him give her a writing of divorcement”
Deuteronomy 24:1
“When a man hath
taken a wife, and married her, and it come to pass that she find no favour in
his eyes, because he hath found some uncleanness in her: then let him write her
a bill of divorcement, and give it in her hand, and send her out of his house.”
The Abrogated Law:
“But I (Jesus
Christ) say unto you, that whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the
cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry
her that is divorced committeth adultery.” Matthew 5:31-32.
The
Law of Swearing and making Oaths:
The Mosaic Law:
“And Moses spake
unto the heads of the tribes concerning the children of Israel, saying, This is
the thing which the LORD hath commanded.
If a man vows a vow
unto the LORD or swear an oath to bind his soul with a bond; he shall not break
his word, he shall do according to all that proceedeth out of his mouth.”
Numbers 30:1-2.
The Abrogated Law:
“Again, ye have
heard that it hath been said by them of old time, Thou shalt not forswear
thyself, but shalt perform unto the Lord thine oaths:
But I say unto you,
Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is God’s throne:
Nor by the earth;
for it is his footstool: neither by Jerusalem; for it is the city of the great
King.
Neither shalt thou
swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black.
But let your
communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh
of evil.” Matthew Ch 5: 33-37.
The
Laws of Revenge:
The Mosaic
Law:
“Eye for eye, tooth
for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,
Burning for burning,
wound for wound, stripe for stripe.
And if a man smite
the eye of his servant, or the eye of his maid, that it perish; he shall let
him go free for his eye’s sake.
And if he smite out
his manservant’s tooth, or his maidservant’s tooth; he shall let him go free
for his tooth’s sake.
If an ox gore a man
or a woman, that they die: then the ox shall be surely stoned, and his flesh
shall not be eaten; but the owner of the ox shall be quit.” Exodus 21:24-28
The Abrogated Law:
“But I say unto you,
That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek,
turn to him the other also.
And if any man will
sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloke also.
And whosoever shall
compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain.
Give to him that
asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away.”Matthew
Ch. 5:39-42.
I have heard people
say that the eye for an eye law does not mean an actual eye for an eye but
rather monetary compensation, I think Jesus knew that also, because He
mentioned those who would sue you and how you should respond to them.
The
Laws of Love and Hate:
The Mosaic
Law:
Law of Killing and
destroying your enemies:
“Thou hast also
given me the necks of mine enemies; that I might destroy them that hate me.”
Psalm 18:40
If you think you can
hate your enemies and encourage or support others to hate and kill people, you
are so wrong.
We cannot or should
not endorse the killing of anyone, even our enemies. “Thou shalt NOT kill,
period! There is no such thing as pre-meditated murder or accidental murder or
revenge killing or self-defence killing in God’s eyes or a differentiation
between killing those of your own community or outsiders.
The Old Testament is
riddled with scriptures about hating your enemies to the point of destroying
them. In the Old Testament, even God ‘hates’, for example, God hates Esau,
Really? See my article on, Jacob have I loved, and Esau have I hated. Another
example is destroying the seven perceived enemies of ancient Israel, “Kill the
woman and children, ham-string the horses and kill everything that has breath.”
And Christians have the audacity to cry foul over the Quran! To my surprise I
have met Christians, even Pastors who use such references to justify the
killing of Palestinians, even if those Palestinians are Christians. I have to
ask myself…” Do these so-called Christians read the New Testament?”
Killing
is killing. We cannot take a life; we are not permitted to do so.
The Abrogated
Law:
Matthew 5:21-26
“Ye have heard that
it was said by them of old time, thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill
shall be in danger of the judgment:
But I say unto you,
That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of
the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger
of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell
fire.
Therefore, if thou
bring thy gift to the altar, and there rememberest that thy brother hath ought
against thee;
Leave there thy gift
before the altar and go thy way; first be reconciled to thy brother, and then
come and offer thy gift.
Agree with thine
adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the
adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer,
and thou be cast into prison.
Verily I say unto
thee, thou shalt by no means come out thence, till thou hast paid the uttermost
farthing.”
Then
there is Mercy…
SHOW NO MERCY or
LOVE MERCY, which one is it?
- “Conquer them; utterly
destroy them; make no covenant with them SHOW NO MERCY. Deuteronomy 7:2
- “And what does the LORD
require of you? But to do justly, TO LOVE MERCY, And to walk humbly with
your God.” Micah 6:8
We must go to none
other than the New Testament to determine which one is correct. If we stay in
the Old Testament, we will never know whether we are supposed to Show Mercy or
not Show Mercy.
If you read widely
in Ancient Near East literature, it’s hard to miss certain similarities in
Laws. Many where simply International Laws and were the same across all ancient
civilizations. They were also in existence prior to Moses, which does not
necessarily mean they were not God’s Laws, it just means Moses incorporated
them into Biblical Laws.
“The ten
commandments were followed by a series of other laws, many of which were
probably re-enactments of laws or regulations already in force. The law of
retaliation, for instance (Exod. xxi. 23-25), is as old as human society; so
also is the law that murder should be punished by death (xxi. 12). The law
which punished the master for the murder of a slave if he died on the spot, but
allowed him to go scot-free if the slave lingered for a day or two (xxi. 20,
21), had its parallel in ancient Babylonia, and the death-penalty exacted from
the ox which had gored a man (xxi. 28-32) is a survival from the days when dumb
animals and even inanimate objects were regarded as responsible for the
injuries they had caused. The regulations in regard to ‘ a field or vineyard,’
or ‘ the standing corn ‘ of a field (xxii. 5, 6), belonged to the land of
Goshen or to Canaan, not to the life in the wilderness, and the dedication of
the firstborn to God (xxii. 29, 30) was one of the most ancient articles of
Semitic faith. (Page 140-141).
Sayce, A. (2004).
The Early History of the Hebrews. 1st ed. [Whitefish, Mont.]: Kessinger Publishing.
